Changes in endothelial cell density after conventional phacoemulsification and FLACS in eyes with dense cataracts.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Sri Ganesh, Sheetal Brar, Sanjali Wadhokar
{"title":"Changes in endothelial cell density after conventional phacoemulsification and FLACS in eyes with dense cataracts.","authors":"Sri Ganesh, Sheetal Brar, Sanjali Wadhokar","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the safety, effectiveness, and changes in endothelial cell density (ECD) after standard phacoemulsification and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) in dense cataracts (Lens Opacities Classification System III grade 3.0 NO and above).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Nethradhama Superspeciality Eye Hospital, Bangalore, India.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective, randomized, comparative study.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>100 eyes of 100 patients were randomly assigned to either conventional phacoemulsification surgery (CPS) or FLACS (LENSAR Laser System) using predefined patterns of nuclear fragmentations. Measured outcomes included intraoperative phacoemulsification time, irrigation fluid volume, surgical time, and complication rates. ECD was evaluated at baseline, 2 weeks, and 6 months postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CPS group had significantly higher mean total phacoemulsification time (11.17 ± 6.5 seconds vs 8.03 ± 3.77 seconds), effective phacoemulsification time (6.14 ± 3.62 seconds vs 4.42 ± 2.07 seconds), and total surgical time (8.18 ± 2.36 minutes vs 7.11 ± 1.55 minutes) than the FLACS group ( P < .001). Volume of irrigation fluid was comparable between the 2 groups (CPS, 36.7 ± 12.18 mL; FLACS, 38.64 ± 13.73 mL ( P = .45). Mean corneal edema score and central corneal thickness values on postoperative day 1 were significantly higher for the CPS group. At 6 months, % ECD loss was significantly higher in the CPS group (16.08%) vs the FLACS group (12.8%) ( P < .001). 3 eyes in the CPS group had wound burns of varying severity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FLACS with customized nuclear fragmentation patterns resulted in significantly less intraoperative phacoemulsification time, surgical time, and endothelial cell loss compared with conventional phacoemulsification when treating dense cataracts.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>CTRI/2021/12/038887.</p>","PeriodicalId":15214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","volume":" ","pages":"572-577"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11146173/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001408","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the safety, effectiveness, and changes in endothelial cell density (ECD) after standard phacoemulsification and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) in dense cataracts (Lens Opacities Classification System III grade 3.0 NO and above).

Setting: Nethradhama Superspeciality Eye Hospital, Bangalore, India.

Design: Prospective, randomized, comparative study.

Method: 100 eyes of 100 patients were randomly assigned to either conventional phacoemulsification surgery (CPS) or FLACS (LENSAR Laser System) using predefined patterns of nuclear fragmentations. Measured outcomes included intraoperative phacoemulsification time, irrigation fluid volume, surgical time, and complication rates. ECD was evaluated at baseline, 2 weeks, and 6 months postoperatively.

Results: The CPS group had significantly higher mean total phacoemulsification time (11.17 ± 6.5 seconds vs 8.03 ± 3.77 seconds), effective phacoemulsification time (6.14 ± 3.62 seconds vs 4.42 ± 2.07 seconds), and total surgical time (8.18 ± 2.36 minutes vs 7.11 ± 1.55 minutes) than the FLACS group ( P < .001). Volume of irrigation fluid was comparable between the 2 groups (CPS, 36.7 ± 12.18 mL; FLACS, 38.64 ± 13.73 mL ( P = .45). Mean corneal edema score and central corneal thickness values on postoperative day 1 were significantly higher for the CPS group. At 6 months, % ECD loss was significantly higher in the CPS group (16.08%) vs the FLACS group (12.8%) ( P < .001). 3 eyes in the CPS group had wound burns of varying severity.

Conclusions: FLACS with customized nuclear fragmentation patterns resulted in significantly less intraoperative phacoemulsification time, surgical time, and endothelial cell loss compared with conventional phacoemulsification when treating dense cataracts.

Trial registration number: CTRI/2021/12/038887.

致密型白内障患者接受传统超声乳化和飞秒激光辅助白内障手术后内皮细胞密度的变化。
目的:比较标准超声乳化术和飞秒激光辅助白内障手术(FLACS)治疗致密型白内障(LOCS III 3.0 NO级及以上)的安全性、有效性以及内皮细胞密度的变化:地点:印度班加罗尔Nethradhama超级眼科医院:设计:前瞻性、随机、对比研究:方法:将 100 名患者的 100 只眼睛随机分配到传统乳化手术(CPS)或 FLACS(LENSAR 激光系统)中,采用预先定义的核碎裂模式。测量结果包括术中超声乳化时间、冲洗液量、手术时间和并发症发生率。在基线、术后 2 周和 6 个月对内皮细胞密度进行评估:结果:CPS 组的平均总 phaco 时间(TPT,11.17 ± 6.5 秒 vs 8.03 ± 3.77 秒)、有效 phaco 时间(EPT,6.14 ± 3.62 秒 vs 4.42 ± 2.07 秒)和总手术时间(8.18 ± 2.36 分钟 vs 7.11 ± 1.55 分钟)均明显高于 FLACS 组(P结论:在治疗致密型白内障时,与传统超声乳化术相比,采用定制核破碎模式的FLACS可显著减少术中超声乳化时间、手术时间和内皮细胞损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
259
审稿时长
8.5 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (JCRS), a preeminent peer-reviewed monthly ophthalmology publication, is the official journal of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS). JCRS publishes high quality articles on all aspects of anterior segment surgery. In addition to original clinical studies, the journal features a consultation section, practical techniques, important cases, and reviews as well as basic science articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信