Feasibility and acceptability of a culturally adapted psychological first aid training intervention (Preparing Me) to support the mental health and well-being of front-line healthcare workers in China: a feasibility randomized controlled trial.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Ling Wang, Ian Norman, Tao Xiao, Yamin Li, Xizhao Li, Ting Liu, Jianjian Wang, Lina Zeng, Ziqing Zhong, Chengzhu Jian, Mary Leamy
{"title":"Feasibility and acceptability of a culturally adapted psychological first aid training intervention (Preparing Me) to support the mental health and well-being of front-line healthcare workers in China: a feasibility randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Ling Wang, Ian Norman, Tao Xiao, Yamin Li, Xizhao Li, Ting Liu, Jianjian Wang, Lina Zeng, Ziqing Zhong, Chengzhu Jian, Mary Leamy","doi":"10.1080/20008066.2023.2299195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Psychological first aid (PFA) training helps to prepare healthcare workers (HCWs) to manage trauma and stress during healthcare emergencies, yet evidence regarding its effectiveness and implementation is lacking.<b>Method:</b> A two-arm feasibility randomized controlled trial design was conducted in a Chinese tertiary hospital. Participants were randomly allocated to receive either a culturally adapted PFA training (the intervention arm) or psychoeducation (the control arm). Feasibility indicators and selected outcomes were collected.<b>Results:</b> In total, 215 workers who expressed an interest in participating in the trial were screened for eligibility, resulting in 96 eligible participants being randomly allocated to the intervention arm (<i>n</i> = 48) and control arm (<i>n</i> = 48). There was a higher retention rate for the face-to-face PFA training session than for the four online group PFA sessions. Participants rated the PFA training as very helpful (86%), with a satisfaction rate of 74.25%, and 47% reported being able to apply their PFA skills in responding to public health emergencies or providing front-line clinical care. Positive outcome changes were observed in PFA knowledge, skills, attitudes, resilience, self-efficacy, compassion satisfaction, and post-traumatic growth. Their scores on depression, anxiety, stress, and burnout measures all declined. Most of these changes were sustained over 3 months (<i>p</i> < .05). Repeated measures analysis of variance found statistically significant interaction effects on depression (<i>F</i><sub>2,232</sub> = 2.874, <i>p</i> = .046, <math><mi>η</mi><msup><mi>p</mi><mn>2</mn></msup></math> = .031) and burnout (<i>F</i><sub>2,211</sub> = 3.729, <i>p</i> = .018, <math><mi>η</mi><msup><mi>p</mi><mn>2</mn></msup></math> = .037), indicating a greater reduction in symptoms of depression and burnout with PFA compared to psychoeducation training.<b>Conclusion:</b> This culturally adapted PFA training intervention was highly acceptable among Chinese HCWs and was feasible in a front-line care setting. Preliminary findings indicated positive changes for the PFA training intervention on knowledge, skills, attitudes, resilience, self-efficacy, compassion satisfaction, and post-traumatic growth, especially a reduction of depression and burnout. Further modifications are recommended and a fully powered evaluation of PFA training is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":12055,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","volume":"15 1","pages":"2299195"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10812857/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2023.2299195","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Psychological first aid (PFA) training helps to prepare healthcare workers (HCWs) to manage trauma and stress during healthcare emergencies, yet evidence regarding its effectiveness and implementation is lacking.Method: A two-arm feasibility randomized controlled trial design was conducted in a Chinese tertiary hospital. Participants were randomly allocated to receive either a culturally adapted PFA training (the intervention arm) or psychoeducation (the control arm). Feasibility indicators and selected outcomes were collected.Results: In total, 215 workers who expressed an interest in participating in the trial were screened for eligibility, resulting in 96 eligible participants being randomly allocated to the intervention arm (n = 48) and control arm (n = 48). There was a higher retention rate for the face-to-face PFA training session than for the four online group PFA sessions. Participants rated the PFA training as very helpful (86%), with a satisfaction rate of 74.25%, and 47% reported being able to apply their PFA skills in responding to public health emergencies or providing front-line clinical care. Positive outcome changes were observed in PFA knowledge, skills, attitudes, resilience, self-efficacy, compassion satisfaction, and post-traumatic growth. Their scores on depression, anxiety, stress, and burnout measures all declined. Most of these changes were sustained over 3 months (p < .05). Repeated measures analysis of variance found statistically significant interaction effects on depression (F2,232 = 2.874, p = .046, ηp2 = .031) and burnout (F2,211 = 3.729, p = .018, ηp2 = .037), indicating a greater reduction in symptoms of depression and burnout with PFA compared to psychoeducation training.Conclusion: This culturally adapted PFA training intervention was highly acceptable among Chinese HCWs and was feasible in a front-line care setting. Preliminary findings indicated positive changes for the PFA training intervention on knowledge, skills, attitudes, resilience, self-efficacy, compassion satisfaction, and post-traumatic growth, especially a reduction of depression and burnout. Further modifications are recommended and a fully powered evaluation of PFA training is warranted.

适应中国文化的心理急救培训干预("为我做准备")的可行性和可接受性,以支持中国一线医护人员的心理健康和福祉:一项可行性随机对照试验。
背景:心理急救(PFA)培训有助于医护人员(HCWs)在医疗紧急情况下处理创伤和压力,但目前还缺乏有关其有效性和实施情况的证据:方法:在一家中国三级医院开展了一项双臂可行性随机对照试验。参与者被随机分配到接受适应文化的 PFA 培训(干预组)或心理教育(对照组)。研究收集了可行性指标和选定的结果:总共对 215 名表示有兴趣参加试验的工作者进行了资格筛选,结果有 96 名符合条件的参与者被随机分配到干预组(48 人)和对照组(48 人)。与四次在线 PFA 小组培训相比,面对面的 PFA 培训课程的保留率更高。参与者认为 PFA 培训非常有用(86%),满意率为 74.25%,47% 的参与者表示能够将 PFA 技能应用于应对公共卫生突发事件或提供一线临床护理。在 PFA 知识、技能、态度、复原力、自我效能感、同情满意度和创伤后成长方面都观察到了积极的结果变化。他们在抑郁、焦虑、压力和职业倦怠方面的得分都有所下降。这些变化大多持续了 3 个月(p F2,232 = 2.874, p = .046, ηp2 = .031)和职业倦怠(F2,211 = 3.729, p = .018, ηp2 = .037),表明与心理教育培训相比,PFA 能更大程度地减轻抑郁症状和职业倦怠:结论:这种经过文化调整的 PFA 培训干预在中国医护人员中的接受度很高,在一线护理环境中也是可行的。初步研究结果表明,PFA 培训干预在知识、技能、态度、复原力、自我效能感、同情满意度和创伤后成长方面都有积极的变化,尤其是抑郁和职业倦怠有所减轻。建议进一步修改,并对 PFA 培训进行全面评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
153
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) is a peer-reviewed open access interdisciplinary journal owned by the European Society of Traumatic Stress Studies (ESTSS). The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) aims to engage scholars, clinicians and researchers in the vital issues of how to understand, prevent and treat the consequences of stress and trauma, including but not limited to, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depressive disorders, substance abuse, burnout, and neurobiological or physical consequences, using the latest research or clinical experience in these areas. The journal shares ESTSS’ mission to advance and disseminate scientific knowledge about traumatic stress. Papers may address individual events, repeated or chronic (complex) trauma, large scale disasters, or violence. Being open access, the European Journal of Psychotraumatology is also evidence of ESTSS’ stand on free accessibility of research publications to a wider community via the web. The European Journal of Psychotraumatology seeks to attract contributions from academics and practitioners from diverse professional backgrounds, including, but not restricted to, those in mental health, social sciences, and health and welfare services. Contributions from outside Europe are welcome. The journal welcomes original basic and clinical research articles that consolidate and expand the theoretical and professional basis of the field of traumatic stress; Review articles including meta-analyses; short communications presenting new ideas or early-stage promising research; study protocols that describe proposed or ongoing research; case reports examining a single individual or event in a real‑life context; clinical practice papers sharing experience from the clinic; letters to the Editor debating articles already published in the Journal; inaugural Lectures; conference abstracts and book reviews. Both quantitative and qualitative research is welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信