Community and Organizational Readiness to Adopt a Physical Activity Intervention in Micropolitan Settings.

IF 1.6 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Health Promotion Practice Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-24 DOI:10.1177/15248399231221728
Nicole Gauthreaux, Rebecca Bucklin, Anna Correa, Eliza Steere, Hanh Pham, Rima A Afifi, Natoshia M Askelson
{"title":"Community and Organizational Readiness to Adopt a Physical Activity Intervention in Micropolitan Settings.","authors":"Nicole Gauthreaux, Rebecca Bucklin, Anna Correa, Eliza Steere, Hanh Pham, Rima A Afifi, Natoshia M Askelson","doi":"10.1177/15248399231221728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundAssessing community and organizational readiness is key to successfully implementing programs. The purpose of this study was to assess the baseline readiness of micropolitan communities to adopt an evidence-based physical activity (PA) intervention by exploring three dimensions: (1) attitudes and current efforts toward prevention, (2) community and organizational climate that facilitates (or impedes) change, and (3) capacity to implement change.MethodData were collected from community leaders in 14 communities through an online survey in June 2021 (n = 149). Data were analyzed in aggregate using descriptive statistics for multiple-choice responses and content analysis for open ended responses. One-way repeated analyses of variance were used to compare mean score differences.ResultsIn reference to their attitudes prior to the pandemic, respondents said that addressing PA was \"somewhat a priority\" in their professional positions (<i>M</i> = 2.01, <i>SD</i> = 0.94), their organizations (<i>M</i> = 2.08, <i>SD</i> = 0.91), and their communities (<i>M</i> = 2.28, <i>SD</i> = 0.88). Current PA efforts included statewide initiatives, community sponsored events/clubs, and youth sports leagues. The community climate included both PA facilitators (mainly outdoor PA resources) and barriers (cost, lack of social services, and an unsupportive PA environment). Individual-level capacity (<i>M</i> = 2.94; <i>SD</i> = 1.21) to adopt a PA program was regarded lower than the community's capacity (<i>M</i> = 3.95; <i>SD</i> = 0.82), and perceptions of capacity at the community level improved even more if technical assistance (<i>M</i> = 3.96; <i>SD</i> = 0.84) or financial support (<i>M</i> = 4.12; <i>SD</i> = 0.80) were provided.ConclusionReadiness varied by dimension, suggesting the need for tailored implementation supports including technical assistance and financial support.</p>","PeriodicalId":47956,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Practice","volume":" ","pages":"486-495"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399231221728","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundAssessing community and organizational readiness is key to successfully implementing programs. The purpose of this study was to assess the baseline readiness of micropolitan communities to adopt an evidence-based physical activity (PA) intervention by exploring three dimensions: (1) attitudes and current efforts toward prevention, (2) community and organizational climate that facilitates (or impedes) change, and (3) capacity to implement change.MethodData were collected from community leaders in 14 communities through an online survey in June 2021 (n = 149). Data were analyzed in aggregate using descriptive statistics for multiple-choice responses and content analysis for open ended responses. One-way repeated analyses of variance were used to compare mean score differences.ResultsIn reference to their attitudes prior to the pandemic, respondents said that addressing PA was "somewhat a priority" in their professional positions (M = 2.01, SD = 0.94), their organizations (M = 2.08, SD = 0.91), and their communities (M = 2.28, SD = 0.88). Current PA efforts included statewide initiatives, community sponsored events/clubs, and youth sports leagues. The community climate included both PA facilitators (mainly outdoor PA resources) and barriers (cost, lack of social services, and an unsupportive PA environment). Individual-level capacity (M = 2.94; SD = 1.21) to adopt a PA program was regarded lower than the community's capacity (M = 3.95; SD = 0.82), and perceptions of capacity at the community level improved even more if technical assistance (M = 3.96; SD = 0.84) or financial support (M = 4.12; SD = 0.80) were provided.ConclusionReadiness varied by dimension, suggesting the need for tailored implementation supports including technical assistance and financial support.

在大都市环境中采用体育活动干预措施的社区和组织准备情况。
背景:评估社区和组织的准备情况是成功实施计划的关键。本研究旨在通过探索以下三个方面,评估微型城市社区采用循证体育活动(PA)干预措施的基线准备情况:(1)对预防的态度和当前努力;(2)促进(或阻碍)变革的社区和组织氛围;以及(3)实施变革的能力:2021 年 6 月,通过在线调查向 14 个社区的社区领袖收集了数据(n = 149)。采用描述性统计对多项选择回答进行汇总分析,采用内容分析对开放式回答进行汇总分析。采用单向重复方差分析比较平均分差异:关于大流行之前的态度,受访者表示,在他们的专业职位(M = 2.01,SD = 0.94)、组织(M = 2.08,SD = 0.91)和社区(M = 2.28,SD = 0.88)中,解决 PA 问题 "有点优先"。当前的 PA 工作包括全州倡议、社区主办的活动/俱乐部和青少年体育联盟。社区环境包括 PA 促进因素(主要是户外 PA 资源)和障碍(费用、缺乏社会服务和不支持 PA 的环境)。个人层面采用 PA 项目的能力(M = 2.94;SD = 1.21)被认为低于社区层面的能力(M = 3.95;SD = 0.82),如果提供技术援助(M = 3.96;SD = 0.84)或财政支持(M = 4.12;SD = 0.80),社区层面的能力感知会有更大改善:结论:不同维度的准备程度各不相同,这表明需要有针对性的实施支持,包括技术援助和财政支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Promotion Practice
Health Promotion Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
126
期刊介绍: Health Promotion Practice (HPP) publishes authoritative articles devoted to the practical application of health promotion and education. It publishes information of strategic importance to a broad base of professionals engaged in the practice of developing, implementing, and evaluating health promotion and disease prevention programs. The journal"s editorial board is committed to focusing on the applications of health promotion and public health education interventions, programs and best practice strategies in various settings, including but not limited to, community, health care, worksite, educational, and international settings. Additionally, the journal focuses on the development and application of public policy conducive to the promotion of health and prevention of disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信