Nicole Gauthreaux, Rebecca Bucklin, Anna Correa, Eliza Steere, Hanh Pham, Rima A Afifi, Natoshia M Askelson
{"title":"Community and Organizational Readiness to Adopt a Physical Activity Intervention in Micropolitan Settings.","authors":"Nicole Gauthreaux, Rebecca Bucklin, Anna Correa, Eliza Steere, Hanh Pham, Rima A Afifi, Natoshia M Askelson","doi":"10.1177/15248399231221728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundAssessing community and organizational readiness is key to successfully implementing programs. The purpose of this study was to assess the baseline readiness of micropolitan communities to adopt an evidence-based physical activity (PA) intervention by exploring three dimensions: (1) attitudes and current efforts toward prevention, (2) community and organizational climate that facilitates (or impedes) change, and (3) capacity to implement change.MethodData were collected from community leaders in 14 communities through an online survey in June 2021 (n = 149). Data were analyzed in aggregate using descriptive statistics for multiple-choice responses and content analysis for open ended responses. One-way repeated analyses of variance were used to compare mean score differences.ResultsIn reference to their attitudes prior to the pandemic, respondents said that addressing PA was \"somewhat a priority\" in their professional positions (<i>M</i> = 2.01, <i>SD</i> = 0.94), their organizations (<i>M</i> = 2.08, <i>SD</i> = 0.91), and their communities (<i>M</i> = 2.28, <i>SD</i> = 0.88). Current PA efforts included statewide initiatives, community sponsored events/clubs, and youth sports leagues. The community climate included both PA facilitators (mainly outdoor PA resources) and barriers (cost, lack of social services, and an unsupportive PA environment). Individual-level capacity (<i>M</i> = 2.94; <i>SD</i> = 1.21) to adopt a PA program was regarded lower than the community's capacity (<i>M</i> = 3.95; <i>SD</i> = 0.82), and perceptions of capacity at the community level improved even more if technical assistance (<i>M</i> = 3.96; <i>SD</i> = 0.84) or financial support (<i>M</i> = 4.12; <i>SD</i> = 0.80) were provided.ConclusionReadiness varied by dimension, suggesting the need for tailored implementation supports including technical assistance and financial support.</p>","PeriodicalId":47956,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Practice","volume":" ","pages":"486-495"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399231221728","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BackgroundAssessing community and organizational readiness is key to successfully implementing programs. The purpose of this study was to assess the baseline readiness of micropolitan communities to adopt an evidence-based physical activity (PA) intervention by exploring three dimensions: (1) attitudes and current efforts toward prevention, (2) community and organizational climate that facilitates (or impedes) change, and (3) capacity to implement change.MethodData were collected from community leaders in 14 communities through an online survey in June 2021 (n = 149). Data were analyzed in aggregate using descriptive statistics for multiple-choice responses and content analysis for open ended responses. One-way repeated analyses of variance were used to compare mean score differences.ResultsIn reference to their attitudes prior to the pandemic, respondents said that addressing PA was "somewhat a priority" in their professional positions (M = 2.01, SD = 0.94), their organizations (M = 2.08, SD = 0.91), and their communities (M = 2.28, SD = 0.88). Current PA efforts included statewide initiatives, community sponsored events/clubs, and youth sports leagues. The community climate included both PA facilitators (mainly outdoor PA resources) and barriers (cost, lack of social services, and an unsupportive PA environment). Individual-level capacity (M = 2.94; SD = 1.21) to adopt a PA program was regarded lower than the community's capacity (M = 3.95; SD = 0.82), and perceptions of capacity at the community level improved even more if technical assistance (M = 3.96; SD = 0.84) or financial support (M = 4.12; SD = 0.80) were provided.ConclusionReadiness varied by dimension, suggesting the need for tailored implementation supports including technical assistance and financial support.
期刊介绍:
Health Promotion Practice (HPP) publishes authoritative articles devoted to the practical application of health promotion and education. It publishes information of strategic importance to a broad base of professionals engaged in the practice of developing, implementing, and evaluating health promotion and disease prevention programs. The journal"s editorial board is committed to focusing on the applications of health promotion and public health education interventions, programs and best practice strategies in various settings, including but not limited to, community, health care, worksite, educational, and international settings. Additionally, the journal focuses on the development and application of public policy conducive to the promotion of health and prevention of disease.