Prosthetic rehabilitation of intraoral defects in patients with rhino-orbital-cerebral-mucormycosis: A systematic review.

IF 1 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Samiksha Wadhwa, Rohit Sunny Mathew, Angleena Y Daniel, Nirmal Kurian, Kevin George Varghese
{"title":"Prosthetic rehabilitation of intraoral defects in patients with rhino-orbital-cerebral-mucormycosis: A systematic review.","authors":"Samiksha Wadhwa, Rohit Sunny Mathew, Angleena Y Daniel, Nirmal Kurian, Kevin George Varghese","doi":"10.4103/jips.jips_305_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to systematically review the frequency and type of intraoral prosthetic rehabilitation in patients with rhino-orbital-cerebral-mucormycosis (ROCM).</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>Systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An electronic search was conducted in databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Case reports that documented prosthetic rehabilitation following surgery in patients with ROCM were included. This review was registered under the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42021262284. Assessment of the quality of the included studies was done using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Case reports, which comprised of an eight-item checklist. The recorded observations were organized and subjected to analysis.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>Qualitative analysis was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 25 case reports, type IId defect was the most common. Three types of prosthetic treatments were rendered, with the obturator being the most common choice of rehabilitation, followed by implant-retained obturator overdenture and fixed implant-supported prosthesis. Patients undergoing implant-based rehabilitation exhibited a 100% survival rate for implants, with follow-up periods spanning from 6 months to 3 years. No prosthetic complications were reported in any of the included case reports.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The prevailing defect type identified was IId (48%), while the treatment of choice most frequently employed was an obturator (84%). However, with limited evidence available at present, further research is required to draw more definitive conclusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":22669,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society","volume":"24 1","pages":"36-45"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10896304/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_305_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to systematically review the frequency and type of intraoral prosthetic rehabilitation in patients with rhino-orbital-cerebral-mucormycosis (ROCM).

Settings and design: Systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

Materials and methods: An electronic search was conducted in databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Case reports that documented prosthetic rehabilitation following surgery in patients with ROCM were included. This review was registered under the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42021262284. Assessment of the quality of the included studies was done using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Case reports, which comprised of an eight-item checklist. The recorded observations were organized and subjected to analysis.

Statistical analysis used: Qualitative analysis was used.

Results: Among the 25 case reports, type IId defect was the most common. Three types of prosthetic treatments were rendered, with the obturator being the most common choice of rehabilitation, followed by implant-retained obturator overdenture and fixed implant-supported prosthesis. Patients undergoing implant-based rehabilitation exhibited a 100% survival rate for implants, with follow-up periods spanning from 6 months to 3 years. No prosthetic complications were reported in any of the included case reports.

Conclusions: The prevailing defect type identified was IId (48%), while the treatment of choice most frequently employed was an obturator (84%). However, with limited evidence available at present, further research is required to draw more definitive conclusions.

鼻-眶-脑-黏液瘤病患者口内缺损的修复:系统综述。
目的:本研究旨在系统回顾鼻-眶-脑-黏液瘤(ROCM)患者口内修复康复的频率和类型:按照《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》指南进行系统综述:在 PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus 和 Google Scholar 等数据库中进行电子检索。纳入了记录 ROCM 患者手术后假体康复的病例报告。本综述已在《国际系统性综述前瞻性登记册》(International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42021262284)中登记。对所纳入研究的质量评估采用了乔安娜-布里格斯研究所的病例报告批判性评估核对表,该核对表由八个项目组成。对记录的观察结果进行了整理和分析:采用定性分析:结果:在 25 份病例报告中,IId 型缺损最为常见。结果:在 25 个病例报告中,Ⅱd 型缺损最为常见,修复方法有三种,其中最常见的修复方法是钝器修复,其次是种植体固位的钝器覆盖义齿和种植体支持的固定义齿。接受种植体修复的患者的种植体存活率为 100%,随访时间从 6 个月到 3 年不等。所有病例报告中均未出现修复并发症:结论:已发现的主要缺损类型是IId(48%),而最常用的治疗方法是闭锁器(84%)。然而,由于目前可用的证据有限,还需要进一步的研究才能得出更明确的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society
The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
26
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信