A comparative analysis of mechanical and optical behavioral patterns of translucent zirconia ceramics.

IF 1 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Nishanth A Sudharson, Nitasha Gandhi, Harit Talwar, Nirmal Kurian, Meril Joseph
{"title":"A comparative analysis of mechanical and optical behavioral patterns of translucent zirconia ceramics.","authors":"Nishanth A Sudharson, Nitasha Gandhi, Harit Talwar, Nirmal Kurian, Meril Joseph","doi":"10.4103/jips.jips_341_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This research aimed to assess and compare the translucency and mechanical properties of partially stabilized zirconia in contrast to lithium disilicate, particularly within the context of translucent zirconia.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>The experimental design entails examining fifty samples, with ten drawn from each of the five distinct categories of ceramic materials, as part of this in vitro study. Translucency is measured using the Konica Minolta CM-3600D spectrophotometer, assessing Delta E through Lab values against white and black backgrounds. Flexural strength is analyzed via a 3-point bend test on a universal testing machine, with a controlled crosshead speed set at 1 mm/min.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study included the five categories of ceramic materials, each consisting of ten samples: High-strength zirconia (Katana HT), translucent zirconia (e.max Zircad MT and Cercon ht ML), and lithium disilicate (Press MT and LT). The Konica Minolta CM-3600D spectrophotometer is utilized to measure the translucency parameter. This involves determining the color difference (Delta E) by comparing the L*a*b values against both white and black backgrounds. The flexural strength (FS) of zirconia and lithium disilicate materials was analyzed through a 3-point bend test, aiming to compare their respective strengths. The testing procedure was carried out on a universal testing machine with a controlled crosshead speed set at 1 mm/min. The FS was calculated using the formula σ = FL/πR3 for circular disks, where σ represents the FS, F is the fracture load, L is the span length in millimeters, and R is the radius of the disk.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>The Student's t-test was employed for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean translucency parameter for e.max Press MT (6.33 ± 1.05) was significantly greater than all the specimens investigated. The Cercon ht ML exhibited a slightly higher translucency (2.18 ± 0.52) compared to e.max Zircad MT (1.49 ± 0.69), with a statistically significant difference (P = 0.022). Conversely, the FS of e.max Zircad MT (26.97 ± 2.06) was significantly greater (P < 0.001) than that of Cercon ht ML (23.25 ± 2.36). Notably, the Katana HT material demonstrated the highest load strength (32.92 ± 3.10), a statistically significant difference compared to its counterparts (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among the materials tested, lithium disilicate ceramics exhibited the highest translucency, with its MT variant demonstrating the lowest strength. Katana HT displayed significantly greater biaxial FS compared to translucent zirconia, surpassing even lithium disilicate. Translucent zirconia proved to be notably more translucent than high-strength zirconia. Within the category of translucent zirconia, e.max Zircad MT exhibited substantially higher FS than Cercon.</p>","PeriodicalId":22669,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society","volume":"24 1","pages":"88-94"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10896311/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_341_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This research aimed to assess and compare the translucency and mechanical properties of partially stabilized zirconia in contrast to lithium disilicate, particularly within the context of translucent zirconia.

Settings and design: The experimental design entails examining fifty samples, with ten drawn from each of the five distinct categories of ceramic materials, as part of this in vitro study. Translucency is measured using the Konica Minolta CM-3600D spectrophotometer, assessing Delta E through Lab values against white and black backgrounds. Flexural strength is analyzed via a 3-point bend test on a universal testing machine, with a controlled crosshead speed set at 1 mm/min.

Materials and methods: The study included the five categories of ceramic materials, each consisting of ten samples: High-strength zirconia (Katana HT), translucent zirconia (e.max Zircad MT and Cercon ht ML), and lithium disilicate (Press MT and LT). The Konica Minolta CM-3600D spectrophotometer is utilized to measure the translucency parameter. This involves determining the color difference (Delta E) by comparing the L*a*b values against both white and black backgrounds. The flexural strength (FS) of zirconia and lithium disilicate materials was analyzed through a 3-point bend test, aiming to compare their respective strengths. The testing procedure was carried out on a universal testing machine with a controlled crosshead speed set at 1 mm/min. The FS was calculated using the formula σ = FL/πR3 for circular disks, where σ represents the FS, F is the fracture load, L is the span length in millimeters, and R is the radius of the disk.

Statistical analysis used: The Student's t-test was employed for statistical analysis.

Results: The mean translucency parameter for e.max Press MT (6.33 ± 1.05) was significantly greater than all the specimens investigated. The Cercon ht ML exhibited a slightly higher translucency (2.18 ± 0.52) compared to e.max Zircad MT (1.49 ± 0.69), with a statistically significant difference (P = 0.022). Conversely, the FS of e.max Zircad MT (26.97 ± 2.06) was significantly greater (P < 0.001) than that of Cercon ht ML (23.25 ± 2.36). Notably, the Katana HT material demonstrated the highest load strength (32.92 ± 3.10), a statistically significant difference compared to its counterparts (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Among the materials tested, lithium disilicate ceramics exhibited the highest translucency, with its MT variant demonstrating the lowest strength. Katana HT displayed significantly greater biaxial FS compared to translucent zirconia, surpassing even lithium disilicate. Translucent zirconia proved to be notably more translucent than high-strength zirconia. Within the category of translucent zirconia, e.max Zircad MT exhibited substantially higher FS than Cercon.

半透明氧化锆陶瓷的机械和光学行为模式比较分析。
目的:本研究旨在评估和比较部分稳定氧化锆与二硅酸锂的半透明度和机械性能,特别是在半透明氧化锆的范围内:作为体外研究的一部分,实验设计需要检测 50 个样品,其中 10 个样品来自 5 个不同类别的陶瓷材料。使用柯尼卡美能达 CM-3600D 分光光度计测量半透明度,在白色和黑色背景下通过 Lab 值评估 Delta E。材料和方法:研究包括五类陶瓷材料,每类由十个样品组成:高强度氧化锆(Katana HT)、半透明氧化锆(e.max Zircad MT 和 Cercon ht ML)和二硅酸锂(Press MT 和 LT)。柯尼卡美能达 CM-3600D 分光光度计用于测量半透明参数。这包括通过比较白色和黑色背景下的 L*a*b 值来确定色差(Delta E)。氧化锆和二硅酸锂材料的抗弯强度(FS)是通过三点弯曲测试进行分析的,目的是比较它们各自的强度。测试过程在万能试验机上进行,十字头速度控制在 1 毫米/分钟。对于圆盘,FS 的计算公式为 σ = FL/πR3,其中 σ 代表 FS,F 为断裂荷载,L 为跨度长度(毫米),R 为圆盘半径:统计分析采用学生 t 检验:结果:e.max Press MT 的平均半透明参数(6.33 ± 1.05)明显高于所有调查的试样。Cercon ht ML 的半透明度(2.18 ± 0.52)略高于 e.max Zircad MT(1.49 ± 0.69),差异有统计学意义(P = 0.022)。相反,e.max Zircad MT 的 FS(26.97 ± 2.06)明显大于 Cercon ht ML 的 FS(23.25 ± 2.36)(P < 0.001)。值得注意的是,Katana HT 材料的负载强度最高(32.92 ± 3.10),与同类材料相比,差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.001):在测试的材料中,二硅酸锂陶瓷的透光度最高,而其 MT 变体的强度最低。与半透明氧化锆相比,卡塔纳 HT 的双轴 FS 明显更高,甚至超过了二硅酸锂。事实证明,半透明氧化锆的半透明度明显高于高强度氧化锆。在半透明氧化锆类别中,e.max Zircad MT 的 FS 明显高于 Cercon。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society
The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
26
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信