Benefitting productivity and the environment: Current and future maize cropping systems improve yield while reducing nitrate load

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Frank G. Dohleman, Ty J. Barten, Nicholas Helland, Subash Dahal, Juan Lopez Arrizia, Sarah Gehlhar, Charles Foresman, David Mack, Kelly Gillespie, Sotirios Archontoulis, Michael J. Castellano
{"title":"Benefitting productivity and the environment: Current and future maize cropping systems improve yield while reducing nitrate load","authors":"Frank G. Dohleman,&nbsp;Ty J. Barten,&nbsp;Nicholas Helland,&nbsp;Subash Dahal,&nbsp;Juan Lopez Arrizia,&nbsp;Sarah Gehlhar,&nbsp;Charles Foresman,&nbsp;David Mack,&nbsp;Kelly Gillespie,&nbsp;Sotirios Archontoulis,&nbsp;Michael J. Castellano","doi":"10.1002/jeq2.20537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Increases in cereal crop yield per area have increased global food security. “Era” studies compare historical and modern crop varieties in controlled experimental settings and are routinely used to understand how advances in crop genetics and management affect crop yield. However, to date, no era study has explored how advances in maize (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) genetics and management (i.e., cropping systems) have affected environmental outcomes. Here, we developed a cropping systems era study in Iowa, USA, to examine how yield and nitrate losses have changed from “Old” systems common in the 1990s to “Current” systems common in the 2010s, and to “Future” systems projected to be common in the 2030s. We tested the following hypothesis: If maize yield and nitrogen use efficiency have improved over previous decades, Current and Future maize systems will have benefits to water quality compared to Old systems. We show that not only have maize yield and nitrogen use efficiency (kg grain kg<sup>−1</sup> N), on average, improved over time but also yield-scaled nitrate load + soil nitrate was reduced by 74% and 91% from Old to Current and Future systems, respectively. Continuing these trajectories of improvement will be critical to meet the needs of a growing and more affluent population while reducing deleterious effects of agricultural systems on ecosystem services.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jeq2.20537","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeq2.20537","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Increases in cereal crop yield per area have increased global food security. “Era” studies compare historical and modern crop varieties in controlled experimental settings and are routinely used to understand how advances in crop genetics and management affect crop yield. However, to date, no era study has explored how advances in maize (Zea mays L.) genetics and management (i.e., cropping systems) have affected environmental outcomes. Here, we developed a cropping systems era study in Iowa, USA, to examine how yield and nitrate losses have changed from “Old” systems common in the 1990s to “Current” systems common in the 2010s, and to “Future” systems projected to be common in the 2030s. We tested the following hypothesis: If maize yield and nitrogen use efficiency have improved over previous decades, Current and Future maize systems will have benefits to water quality compared to Old systems. We show that not only have maize yield and nitrogen use efficiency (kg grain kg−1 N), on average, improved over time but also yield-scaled nitrate load + soil nitrate was reduced by 74% and 91% from Old to Current and Future systems, respectively. Continuing these trajectories of improvement will be critical to meet the needs of a growing and more affluent population while reducing deleterious effects of agricultural systems on ecosystem services.

Abstract Image

提高生产力,保护环境:当前和未来的玉米种植系统在提高产量的同时减少硝酸盐负荷。
谷类作物单位面积产量的提高增强了全球粮食安全。"年代 "研究在受控实验环境中比较历史和现代作物品种,通常用于了解作物遗传学和管理学的进步如何影响作物产量。然而,迄今为止,还没有一项年代研究探讨了玉米(Zea mays L.)遗传学和管理(即耕作制度)的进步如何影响环境结果。在此,我们在美国爱荷华州开展了一项耕作制度时代研究,以考察从 20 世纪 90 年代常见的 "旧 "耕作制度到 2010 年代常见的 "当前 "耕作制度,再到预计 2030 年代常见的 "未来 "耕作制度,产量和硝酸盐损失发生了哪些变化。我们测试了以下假设:如果玉米产量和氮素利用效率在过去几十年中有所提高,那么 "当前 "和 "未来 "玉米种植系统将比 "旧 "种植系统更有利于水质。我们的研究表明,随着时间的推移,不仅玉米产量和氮利用效率(千克谷物千克-1 氮)平均有所提高,而且从旧系统到当前和未来系统,产量标度硝酸盐负荷+土壤硝酸盐分别减少了 74% 和 91%。要满足日益增长的富裕人口的需求,同时减少农业系统对生态系统服务的有害影响,继续保持这些改进轨迹至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信