Opportunities and challenges in using NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database for research on non-nutrient ingredients: Use case for ingredients in honeybee products

IF 2.4 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Alessandra Durazzo , Massimo Lucarini , Johanna T. Dwyer , Barbara C. Sorkin , Michael Heinrich , Pamela Pehrsson
{"title":"Opportunities and challenges in using NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database for research on non-nutrient ingredients: Use case for ingredients in honeybee products","authors":"Alessandra Durazzo ,&nbsp;Massimo Lucarini ,&nbsp;Johanna T. Dwyer ,&nbsp;Barbara C. Sorkin ,&nbsp;Michael Heinrich ,&nbsp;Pamela Pehrsson","doi":"10.1016/j.phanu.2024.100377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Non-nutrient bioactive ingredients of foods such as bee products are often of interest in preclinical and </span>clinical research<span> to explore their possible beneficial effects. The National Institute of Health’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD) contains over 165,000 labels of dietary supplements marketed in the United States of America (US), including declarations on labels for many ingredients such as those in honeybee products which have been used in foods and traditional medicines for centuries worldwide and are now also appearing in dietary supplements.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This article presents a use case for honeybee products that describes and tests the utility of the DSLD and other databases available in the US as research tools for identifying and quantifying the prevalence of such ingredients. It focuses on the limitations to the information on product composition in these databases and describes how to code the ingredients using the LanguaL™ and FoodEx2 classification and description systems and the strengths and limitations of information on honeybee product ingredients, including propolis, bee pollen, royal jelly, beeswax.</p></div><div><h3>Results and conclusions</h3><p>Codes for the ingredients are provided for identifying their presence in LanguaL™ and FoodEx2 classification and description systems used in Europe and elsewhere. The prevalence of dietary supplement products containing these ingredients in DSLD and on the US market is low compared to some other products and ingredients. Unfortunately label declarations in DSLD do not provide quantitative information and so the data can be used only to screen for their presence, but cannot be used for quantitative exposure estimates by researchers and regulators.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20049,"journal":{"name":"PharmaNutrition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PharmaNutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213434424000033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Non-nutrient bioactive ingredients of foods such as bee products are often of interest in preclinical and clinical research to explore their possible beneficial effects. The National Institute of Health’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD) contains over 165,000 labels of dietary supplements marketed in the United States of America (US), including declarations on labels for many ingredients such as those in honeybee products which have been used in foods and traditional medicines for centuries worldwide and are now also appearing in dietary supplements.

Methods

This article presents a use case for honeybee products that describes and tests the utility of the DSLD and other databases available in the US as research tools for identifying and quantifying the prevalence of such ingredients. It focuses on the limitations to the information on product composition in these databases and describes how to code the ingredients using the LanguaL™ and FoodEx2 classification and description systems and the strengths and limitations of information on honeybee product ingredients, including propolis, bee pollen, royal jelly, beeswax.

Results and conclusions

Codes for the ingredients are provided for identifying their presence in LanguaL™ and FoodEx2 classification and description systems used in Europe and elsewhere. The prevalence of dietary supplement products containing these ingredients in DSLD and on the US market is low compared to some other products and ingredients. Unfortunately label declarations in DSLD do not provide quantitative information and so the data can be used only to screen for their presence, but cannot be used for quantitative exposure estimates by researchers and regulators.

利用美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)膳食补充剂标签数据库开展非营养成分研究的机遇与挑战:含蜜蜂成分产品使用案例
背景食品中的非营养生物活性成分(如蜂产品)往往是临床前和临床研究的兴趣所在,以探索其可能的有益作用。美国国立卫生研究院的膳食补充剂标签数据库(DSLD)收录了165,000多份在美国市场上销售的膳食补充剂标签,其中包括许多成分在标签上的声明,如蜜蜂产品中的成分,这些成分几个世纪以来一直被用于世界各地的食品和传统药物中,现在也出现在膳食补充剂中。它重点介绍了这些数据库中产品成分信息的局限性,说明了如何使用LanguaL™和FoodEx2分类和描述系统对成分进行编码,以及蜂产品成分(包括蜂胶、蜂花粉、蜂王浆、蜂蜡)信息的优势和局限性。结果和结论提供了成分编码,以便在欧洲和其他地方使用的LanguaL™和FoodEx2分类和描述系统中识别这些成分的存在。与其他一些产品和成分相比,在 DSLD 和美国市场上含有这些成分的膳食补充剂产品较少。遗憾的是,DSLD 中的标签声明不提供定量信息,因此这些数据只能用于筛查是否含有这些成分,而不能用于研究人员和监管机构对暴露量的定量估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PharmaNutrition
PharmaNutrition Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
33
审稿时长
12 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信