Cancer patients admitted in the intensive care unit: Characteristics and outcomes

Petra Zieher , Márcia Eliane Giuliato , Luana Turra , Mariane Carolina de Almeida , Sara Fernanda Hilgert , Antuani Rafael Baptistella
{"title":"Cancer patients admitted in the intensive care unit: Characteristics and outcomes","authors":"Petra Zieher ,&nbsp;Márcia Eliane Giuliato ,&nbsp;Luana Turra ,&nbsp;Mariane Carolina de Almeida ,&nbsp;Sara Fernanda Hilgert ,&nbsp;Antuani Rafael Baptistella","doi":"10.1016/j.acci.2023.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of this study was to identify the profile of cancer patients admitted in the intensive care unit (ICU) and compares the outcomes with non-cancer patients hospitalized in the same period.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>This is a cross-sectional study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Data were collected from medical records at Hospital Universitário Santa Terezinha, Joaçaba-SC, Brazil.</p></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><p>Admitted at ICU from April to November 2018.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>NA.</p></div><div><h3>Main variables of interest</h3><p>ICU outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>Of the 183 patients, 92 were cancer patients and 91 were non-cancer patients. There was a predominance of females for cancer and males for non-caner group, mostly elderly. Most hospitalizations of cancer patients were postoperative (49.4%). The cause of hospitalization of non-cancer patients was pneumonia, followed by traumatic brain injury, postoperative period, polytrauma, and septicemia. On the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scale, cancer patients scored an average of 7.8 (±4.2) and on the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health </span>Disease Classification System (APACHE II) 13.3 points (±8.6), whereas non-cancer scored 7.6 (±3.55) and 20.9 points (±7.2), respectively. Non-cancer patients used more invasive mechanical ventilation and vasoactive drugs.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Cancer patients received less sedation and used less mechanical ventilation than non-cancer patients. In addition, cancer patients had a lower APACHE II score, denoting a less severe condition. Most surgical cancer patients demonstrate to benefit from intensive care, but it is still necessary to create more specific criteria for ICU admission.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100016,"journal":{"name":"Acta Colombiana de Cuidado Intensivo","volume":"24 2","pages":"Pages 86-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Colombiana de Cuidado Intensivo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0122726223000903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to identify the profile of cancer patients admitted in the intensive care unit (ICU) and compares the outcomes with non-cancer patients hospitalized in the same period.

Design

This is a cross-sectional study.

Setting

Data were collected from medical records at Hospital Universitário Santa Terezinha, Joaçaba-SC, Brazil.

Patients

Admitted at ICU from April to November 2018.

Interventions

NA.

Main variables of interest

ICU outcomes.

Results

Of the 183 patients, 92 were cancer patients and 91 were non-cancer patients. There was a predominance of females for cancer and males for non-caner group, mostly elderly. Most hospitalizations of cancer patients were postoperative (49.4%). The cause of hospitalization of non-cancer patients was pneumonia, followed by traumatic brain injury, postoperative period, polytrauma, and septicemia. On the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scale, cancer patients scored an average of 7.8 (±4.2) and on the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Disease Classification System (APACHE II) 13.3 points (±8.6), whereas non-cancer scored 7.6 (±3.55) and 20.9 points (±7.2), respectively. Non-cancer patients used more invasive mechanical ventilation and vasoactive drugs.

Conclusion

Cancer patients received less sedation and used less mechanical ventilation than non-cancer patients. In addition, cancer patients had a lower APACHE II score, denoting a less severe condition. Most surgical cancer patients demonstrate to benefit from intensive care, but it is still necessary to create more specific criteria for ICU admission.

入住重症监护室的癌症患者:特征和结果
目的本研究旨在确定重症监护室(ICU)收治的癌症患者的特征,并将其结果与同期住院的非癌症患者进行比较。结果在183名患者中,92人为癌症患者,91人为非癌症患者。癌症患者中女性居多,非癌症患者中男性居多,且多为老年人。癌症患者的住院原因多为术后(49.4%)。非癌症患者的住院原因是肺炎,其次是脑外伤、术后、多发性创伤和败血症。在序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)量表中,癌症患者的平均得分为 7.8 分(±4.2),急性生理学和慢性健康疾病分类系统(APACHE II)的平均得分为 13.3 分(±8.6),而非癌症患者的平均得分分别为 7.6 分(±3.55)和 20.9 分(±7.2)。结论与非癌症患者相比,癌症患者接受的镇静剂和使用的机械通气较少。此外,癌症患者的 APACHE II 评分较低,说明病情较轻。大多数手术癌症患者都能从重症监护中获益,但仍有必要为入住重症监护病房制定更具体的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信