{"title":"Anayasa Yapım Sürecinde Muhalefet Olgusunun Meclis Tutanakları Üzerinden Değerlendirilmesi: 1921, 1924 ve 1961 Anayasaları Örneği","authors":"Mehmet Duyar","doi":"10.52096/usbd.8.33.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Constitutions are texts that regulate the organs of the state, their functioning and the fundamental rights and freedoms of individuals vis-à-vis the state. Both these texts themselves and their drafting processes are of particular importance. Especially in constitution-making processes where citizens are indirectly involved in the process through their representatives, the existence and impact of the opposition phenomenon shows the democratic quality of the constitution. In this context, this study aims to examine the phenomenon of opposition in the Turkish constitution-making processes in the 1921 and later periods through parliamentary minutes. According to the results of the analysis conducted from a qualitative perspective with an interpretivist approach, it is determined that there was a functioning and qualified opposition phenomenon in the 1921 and 1924 constitution-making processes, while this determination is controversial in the 1961 constitution-making process. Key Words: Constitution making, political opposition, parliamentary debates.","PeriodicalId":506660,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Social Sciences","volume":"57 36","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52096/usbd.8.33.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Constitutions are texts that regulate the organs of the state, their functioning and the fundamental rights and freedoms of individuals vis-à-vis the state. Both these texts themselves and their drafting processes are of particular importance. Especially in constitution-making processes where citizens are indirectly involved in the process through their representatives, the existence and impact of the opposition phenomenon shows the democratic quality of the constitution. In this context, this study aims to examine the phenomenon of opposition in the Turkish constitution-making processes in the 1921 and later periods through parliamentary minutes. According to the results of the analysis conducted from a qualitative perspective with an interpretivist approach, it is determined that there was a functioning and qualified opposition phenomenon in the 1921 and 1924 constitution-making processes, while this determination is controversial in the 1961 constitution-making process. Key Words: Constitution making, political opposition, parliamentary debates.