A laser–laser method for carbonate C and O isotope measurement, metrology assessment, and stratigraphic applications

Alban Petitjean, Christophe Thomazo, Olivier Musset, Ivan Jovovic, Pierre Sansjofre, K. Kirsimäe
{"title":"A laser–laser method for carbonate C and O isotope measurement, metrology assessment, and stratigraphic applications","authors":"Alban Petitjean, Christophe Thomazo, Olivier Musset, Ivan Jovovic, Pierre Sansjofre, K. Kirsimäe","doi":"10.3389/fgeoc.2023.1334490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The stable isotopic compositions of carbon and oxygen (δ13Ccarb and δ18Ocarb) measured from carbonates are widely used in geology, notably to reconstruct paleotemperatures and the secular evolution of the biogeochemical carbon cycle, to characterize limestone sediment diagenesis, and to provide chemostratigraphy records. The standard technique used since the mid-20th century to measure C and O isotopic ratios is based on a wet chemical acid digestion protocol in order to evolve CO2 from carbonates—the latter being analyzed by mass spectrometry and, more recently, infrared spectroscopy. A newly developed laser-based method aims to circumvent this chemical preparation step by producing CO2 via an instant and spatially resolved calcination reaction. We describe an evolution of the laser calcination benchtop system previously described and used as a proof of concept toward a portable system, and we present the efficiency of this tool for performing carbon and oxygen isotope measurements from carbonate matrixes following standard evaluation metrology protocol. This metrological study explores the following: i) the use of internal standards; ii) inter-calibration with the traditional acid chemical preparation method; iii) analysis of the uncertainties of using GUM and ANOVA. Using 15 different types of carbonate minerals encompassing a range of isotopic VPDB compositions between −18.6‰ and +16.06‰ and between −14.80‰ and −1.72‰ for δ13Ccarb and δ18Ocarb, we show that isotopic cross-calibration is verified for both carbon and oxygen, respectively, and we demonstrate that the uncertainties (1σ) of the δ13Ccarb and δ18Ocarb measurements of laser–laser isotopic analysis are within 0.41‰ and 0.68‰, respectively. The advantages of this method in saving time and spatially resolved and automated analysis in situ are demonstrated by high-resolution chemostratigraphic analysis of a laminated lacustrine travertine sample.","PeriodicalId":472150,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Geochemistry","volume":"14 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Geochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgeoc.2023.1334490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The stable isotopic compositions of carbon and oxygen (δ13Ccarb and δ18Ocarb) measured from carbonates are widely used in geology, notably to reconstruct paleotemperatures and the secular evolution of the biogeochemical carbon cycle, to characterize limestone sediment diagenesis, and to provide chemostratigraphy records. The standard technique used since the mid-20th century to measure C and O isotopic ratios is based on a wet chemical acid digestion protocol in order to evolve CO2 from carbonates—the latter being analyzed by mass spectrometry and, more recently, infrared spectroscopy. A newly developed laser-based method aims to circumvent this chemical preparation step by producing CO2 via an instant and spatially resolved calcination reaction. We describe an evolution of the laser calcination benchtop system previously described and used as a proof of concept toward a portable system, and we present the efficiency of this tool for performing carbon and oxygen isotope measurements from carbonate matrixes following standard evaluation metrology protocol. This metrological study explores the following: i) the use of internal standards; ii) inter-calibration with the traditional acid chemical preparation method; iii) analysis of the uncertainties of using GUM and ANOVA. Using 15 different types of carbonate minerals encompassing a range of isotopic VPDB compositions between −18.6‰ and +16.06‰ and between −14.80‰ and −1.72‰ for δ13Ccarb and δ18Ocarb, we show that isotopic cross-calibration is verified for both carbon and oxygen, respectively, and we demonstrate that the uncertainties (1σ) of the δ13Ccarb and δ18Ocarb measurements of laser–laser isotopic analysis are within 0.41‰ and 0.68‰, respectively. The advantages of this method in saving time and spatially resolved and automated analysis in situ are demonstrated by high-resolution chemostratigraphic analysis of a laminated lacustrine travertine sample.
用于碳酸盐 C 和 O 同位素测量、计量评估和地层应用的激光-激光方法
从碳酸盐岩中测得的碳和氧的稳定同位素组成(δ13Ccarb 和 δ18Ocarb)在地质学中得到广泛应用,主要用于重建古温度和生物地球化学碳循环的世代演化,描述石灰岩沉积物成岩过程的特征,以及提供化合地层记录。自 20 世纪中叶以来,测量 C 和 O 同位素比值的标准技术是基于湿化学酸消化方案,以便从碳酸盐中提取二氧化碳--后者通过质谱法和最近的红外光谱法进行分析。一种新开发的基于激光的方法旨在通过瞬间和空间分辨的煅烧反应生成二氧化碳,从而规避这一化学制备步骤。我们介绍了激光煅烧台式系统的演变过程,该系统之前作为概念验证被用于便携式系统,我们还介绍了该工具按照标准评估计量协议对碳酸盐基质进行碳和氧同位素测量的效率。本计量学研究探讨了以下内容:i) 内部标准的使用;ii) 与传统酸化学制备方法的相互校准;iii) 使用 GUM 和方差分析的不确定性分析。使用 15 种不同类型的碳酸盐矿物,其 VPDB 同位素组成范围介于 -18.6‰ 与 +16.06‰ 之间,以及 -14.80‰ 与 -1.通过对δ13Ccarb 和δ18Ocarb 的测量结果进行分析,我们证明了碳和氧的同位素交叉校准均得到了验证,并证明了激光-激光同位素分析的δ13Ccarb 和δ18Ocarb 测量结果的不确定度(1σ)分别在 0.41‰ 和 0.68‰ 以内。通过对层状湖积石灰华样本进行高分辨率化合地层分析,证明了该方法在节省时间、空间分辨和原位自动分析方面的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信