Family-centred practice and family outcomes in residential youth care: A systematic review

IF 1.6 3区社会学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES

Child & Family Social Work Pub Date : 2024-01-12 DOI:10.1111/cfs.13120

Emily Tang, Amaranta D. de Haan, Chris H. Z. Kuiper, Annemiek T. Harder

{"title":"Family-centred practice and family outcomes in residential youth care: A systematic review","authors":"Emily Tang, Amaranta D. de Haan, Chris H. Z. Kuiper, Annemiek T. Harder","doi":"10.1111/cfs.13120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Family-centred practice (FCP) has been suggested as a best practice for treating youth with emotional and behavioural difficulties in residential care. In this preregistered systematic review, we examined how FCP is operationalized and measured in residential youth care and which family outcomes are associated with FCP. Our systematic search in six databases identified 5784 articles. We analysed included articles by coding the operationalizations of FCP in the interventions and study measures. Further, we descriptively summarized relations between FCP and family outcomes. Thirteen articles met our inclusion criteria. In these articles, FCP was operationalized by five types of youth worker actions in interventions and was measured as five types of family involvement. Ten articles examined pre–post differences in family-centred interventions. Only four articles analysed relations between FCP and a family outcome. Studies found some support for a positive association between FCP and whole-family functioning, but overall, the association between FCP and family outcomes remains unclear. Our findings demonstrate that more research is needed that specifically examines different aspects of FCP and how they relate to family outcomes in residential youth care. Such studies can benefit from the conceptual model proposed for FCP in residential youth care interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10025,"journal":{"name":"Child & Family Social Work","volume":"29 3","pages":"598-614"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cfs.13120","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child & Family Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cfs.13120","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Family-centred practice (FCP) has been suggested as a best practice for treating youth with emotional and behavioural difficulties in residential care. In this preregistered systematic review, we examined how FCP is operationalized and measured in residential youth care and which family outcomes are associated with FCP. Our systematic search in six databases identified 5784 articles. We analysed included articles by coding the operationalizations of FCP in the interventions and study measures. Further, we descriptively summarized relations between FCP and family outcomes. Thirteen articles met our inclusion criteria. In these articles, FCP was operationalized by five types of youth worker actions in interventions and was measured as five types of family involvement. Ten articles examined pre–post differences in family-centred interventions. Only four articles analysed relations between FCP and a family outcome. Studies found some support for a positive association between FCP and whole-family functioning, but overall, the association between FCP and family outcomes remains unclear. Our findings demonstrate that more research is needed that specifically examines different aspects of FCP and how they relate to family outcomes in residential youth care. Such studies can benefit from the conceptual model proposed for FCP in residential youth care interventions.

Abstract Image

查看原文本刊更多论文

以家庭为中心的实践与青少年寄宿照料中的家庭成果：系统回顾

以家庭为中心的实践（FCP）被认为是治疗寄宿青少年情绪和行为障碍的最佳方法。在这篇预先注册的系统性综述中，我们研究了如何在寄宿式青少年看护中实施和衡量以家庭为中心的实践，以及哪些家庭结果与以家庭为中心的实践相关。我们在六个数据库中进行了系统性检索，发现了 5784 篇文章。我们通过对干预和研究措施中 FCP 的操作方法进行编码，对收录的文章进行了分析。此外，我们还对 FCP 与家庭结果之间的关系进行了描述性总结。有 13 篇文章符合我们的纳入标准。在这些文章中，FCP 通过青少年工作者在干预中的五种行动进行操作，并通过五种家庭参与类型进行测量。十篇文章研究了以家庭为中心的干预措施的前后差异。只有四篇文章分析了 FCP 与家庭结果之间的关系。研究发现，家庭为中心干预与整个家庭功能之间的正相关关系得到了一些支持，但总体而言，家庭为中心干预与家庭结果之间的关系仍不明确。我们的研究结果表明，需要开展更多的研究，具体考察家庭综合方案的不同方面，以及它们与寄宿青少年照料家庭结果之间的关系。这些研究可以从为寄宿青少年关怀干预中的家庭支持项目所提出的概念模型中获益。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Child & Family Social Work Multiple-

CiteScore

3.50

自引率

5.90%

发文量

期刊介绍： Child and Family Social Work provides a forum where researchers, practitioners, policy-makers and managers in the field of child and family social work exchange knowledge, increase understanding and develop notions of good practice. In its promotion of research and practice, which is both disciplined and articulate, the Journal is dedicated to advancing the wellbeing and welfare of children and their families throughout the world. Child and Family Social Work publishes original and distinguished contributions on matters of research, theory, policy and practice in the field of social work with children and their families. The Journal gives international definition to the discipline and practice of child and family social work.