The relationship between attachment and anxiety. Comparative study between teenagers with disabilities coming from paternal versus maternal single-parent families

Eximia Pub Date : 2024-01-15 DOI:10.47577/eximia.v13i1.427
Marinela Tudor, Mihaela Luminita Sandu, M. Rus
{"title":"The relationship between attachment and anxiety. Comparative study between teenagers with disabilities coming from paternal versus maternal single-parent families","authors":"Marinela Tudor, Mihaela Luminita Sandu, M. Rus","doi":"10.47577/eximia.v13i1.427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Starting from the hypothesis that the formation of a different type of attachment than the secure one can generate anxiety - a disturbing phenomenon of social adaptation, manifested by excessive fear - the present study aimed to investigate this aspect in the context of adolescents with multiple disabilities. This thematic choice constituted the motivational foundation of the research. The main purpose of the study was to examine, within the selected sample, if there are significant differences in the development of disabled adolescents, depending on their origin from a single-parent family environment, either maternal or paternal. More specifically, the research looked at the relationship between anxiety level and attachment style in adolescents with multiple disabilities in the sample. The study sample was set at 50 subjects, aged between 15 and 18 years. After analyzing the data and establishing a standard, a non-random sampling method with quotas was chosen. The criteria for inclusion in the population were: female and male adolescents, aged between 15 and 18 years, coming from single-parent or nuclear (two-parent) families, the presence of multiple disabilities, with the exception of severe intellectual disability or other conditions that could limit the understanding of the questionnaire items, balancing the number of female and male participants, as well as those from single-parent and two-parent families. The research methodology included the use of interviews and questionnaires. To identify the attachment style, the Attachment Style Questionnaire (C.S.A.), developed by Collins and Read in 1990, was used. To measure the level of anxiety, two anxiety questionnaires were combined, adapting their wording to be accessible to participants with impairments associated with mild or moderate intellectual disability. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to examine the relationship between attachment style and anxiety among adolescents with multiple disabilities, with a particular focus on identifying significant differences between these variables.","PeriodicalId":475299,"journal":{"name":"Eximia","volume":"20 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eximia","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47577/eximia.v13i1.427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Starting from the hypothesis that the formation of a different type of attachment than the secure one can generate anxiety - a disturbing phenomenon of social adaptation, manifested by excessive fear - the present study aimed to investigate this aspect in the context of adolescents with multiple disabilities. This thematic choice constituted the motivational foundation of the research. The main purpose of the study was to examine, within the selected sample, if there are significant differences in the development of disabled adolescents, depending on their origin from a single-parent family environment, either maternal or paternal. More specifically, the research looked at the relationship between anxiety level and attachment style in adolescents with multiple disabilities in the sample. The study sample was set at 50 subjects, aged between 15 and 18 years. After analyzing the data and establishing a standard, a non-random sampling method with quotas was chosen. The criteria for inclusion in the population were: female and male adolescents, aged between 15 and 18 years, coming from single-parent or nuclear (two-parent) families, the presence of multiple disabilities, with the exception of severe intellectual disability or other conditions that could limit the understanding of the questionnaire items, balancing the number of female and male participants, as well as those from single-parent and two-parent families. The research methodology included the use of interviews and questionnaires. To identify the attachment style, the Attachment Style Questionnaire (C.S.A.), developed by Collins and Read in 1990, was used. To measure the level of anxiety, two anxiety questionnaires were combined, adapting their wording to be accessible to participants with impairments associated with mild or moderate intellectual disability. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to examine the relationship between attachment style and anxiety among adolescents with multiple disabilities, with a particular focus on identifying significant differences between these variables.
依恋与焦虑之间的关系。来自父系和母系单亲家庭的残疾青少年的比较研究
与安全型依恋不同的依恋类型的形成会产生焦虑--一种以过度恐惧为表现形式的令人不安的社会适应现象--这一假设是本研究的出发点,目的是在多重残疾青少年的背景下调查这方面的情况。这一主题选择构成了本研究的动机基础。本研究的主要目的是在选定的样本中,根据残疾青少年来自单亲家庭环境(母亲或父亲)的不同,研究残疾青少年的发展是否存在显著差异。更具体地说,研究考察了样本中多重残疾青少年的焦虑水平和依恋风格之间的关系。研究样本设定为 50 名受试者,年龄在 15 至 18 岁之间。在对数据进行分析并确定标准后,选择了一种带有配额的非随机抽样方法。纳入人群的标准是:年龄在 15 至 18 岁之间的男女青少年,来自单亲家庭或核心家庭(双亲),存在多种残疾,但严重智障或其他可能限制理解问卷项目的情况除外,平衡女性和男性参与者的数量,以及来自单亲家庭和双亲家庭的参与者的数量。研究方法包括访谈和问卷调查。为了确定依恋风格,使用了柯林斯和雷德于 1990 年编制的依恋风格问卷(C.S.A.)。为了测量焦虑程度,我们合并了两份焦虑问卷,并对其措辞进行了调整,以便轻度或中度智力障碍的参与者也能使用。因此,本研究的主要目的是探讨多重残疾青少年的依恋风格与焦虑之间的关系,尤其侧重于确定这些变量之间的显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书