The Role of Patient-Reported Social Factors in Promoting Buprenorphine Consistency

Brenna Cook, Michelle Eglovitch, D. Svikis, Caitlin E Martin
{"title":"The Role of Patient-Reported Social Factors in Promoting Buprenorphine Consistency","authors":"Brenna Cook, Michelle Eglovitch, D. Svikis, Caitlin E Martin","doi":"10.33696/psychiatry.1.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: While medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) reduce overdose risk, inconsistent use can lead to substance use recurrence and compromise achieving optimal opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment outcomes. Research is limited on patient-reported perspectives on consistency of MOUD self-administration at home and its related social factors.\n\nObjectives: The primary aim was to report on rates of patient-reported buprenorphine consistency among a sample receiving outpatient OUD treatment. The secondary aim was to explore differences in social determinants of health (SDOH) between patients reporting and not reporting lapses in buprenorphine dosing.\n\nMethods: This is a secondary analysis from a cross-sectional survey and medical record abstraction study (N=96). The primary outcome was patient-reported buprenorphine consistency, as defined as no lapses in buprenorphine dosing in a preceding 28-day period. SDOH survey items were adapted from the Healthy People 2030 framework.\n\nResults: Participants (n= 96) were three quarters female (74.0%); most identified as white (54.2%) or Black (38.9%). Most reported not missing any buprenorphine doses over the preceding 28-days (88.5%). Demographic and clinical variables were similar between buprenorphine consistency groups. Participants reporting no missed doses reported few negative social determinants of health (examples: 90% not needing help reading hospital materials and not being afraid that they would be hurt in their apartment building or house).\n\nDiscussion: These findings reinforce the known role of SDOH as strong predictors of treatment outcomes for chronic diseases (like substance use disorders), beyond contributions by demographic or clinical variables alone.\n\nConclusions: Future MOUD research should incorporate patient perspectives with the goal of informing patient-centered interventions. Scientific Significance: Promoting consistency in buprenorphine dosing using strategies grounded in patient experience could be an avenue to promote positive OUD treatment outcomes.","PeriodicalId":348648,"journal":{"name":"The Archives of Psychiatry","volume":"50 34","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Archives of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33696/psychiatry.1.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) reduce overdose risk, inconsistent use can lead to substance use recurrence and compromise achieving optimal opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment outcomes. Research is limited on patient-reported perspectives on consistency of MOUD self-administration at home and its related social factors. Objectives: The primary aim was to report on rates of patient-reported buprenorphine consistency among a sample receiving outpatient OUD treatment. The secondary aim was to explore differences in social determinants of health (SDOH) between patients reporting and not reporting lapses in buprenorphine dosing. Methods: This is a secondary analysis from a cross-sectional survey and medical record abstraction study (N=96). The primary outcome was patient-reported buprenorphine consistency, as defined as no lapses in buprenorphine dosing in a preceding 28-day period. SDOH survey items were adapted from the Healthy People 2030 framework. Results: Participants (n= 96) were three quarters female (74.0%); most identified as white (54.2%) or Black (38.9%). Most reported not missing any buprenorphine doses over the preceding 28-days (88.5%). Demographic and clinical variables were similar between buprenorphine consistency groups. Participants reporting no missed doses reported few negative social determinants of health (examples: 90% not needing help reading hospital materials and not being afraid that they would be hurt in their apartment building or house). Discussion: These findings reinforce the known role of SDOH as strong predictors of treatment outcomes for chronic diseases (like substance use disorders), beyond contributions by demographic or clinical variables alone. Conclusions: Future MOUD research should incorporate patient perspectives with the goal of informing patient-centered interventions. Scientific Significance: Promoting consistency in buprenorphine dosing using strategies grounded in patient experience could be an avenue to promote positive OUD treatment outcomes.
患者报告的社会因素在促进丁丙诺啡一致性中的作用
背景:治疗阿片类药物使用障碍(MOUD)的药物虽然可以降低用药过量的风险,但用药不一致会导致药物使用的复发,影响阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)的最佳治疗效果。关于患者报告的在家中自行服用阿片类药物的一致性及其相关社会因素的研究十分有限:主要目的是报告在接受门诊 OUD 治疗的样本中,患者报告的丁丙诺啡一致性比率。次要目的是探讨报告和未报告丁丙诺啡用药失误的患者在健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)方面的差异:这是一项横断面调查和病历摘要研究(N=96)的二次分析。主要结果是患者报告的丁丙诺啡用药一致性,即在之前的 28 天内没有丁丙诺啡用药失误。SDOH调查项目改编自《健康2030》框架:参与者(n= 96)中四分之三为女性(74.0%);大多数自称为白人(54.2%)或黑人(38.9%)。大多数人称在过去的 28 天内没有错过任何丁丙诺啡剂量(88.5%)。丁丙诺啡浓度组之间的人口统计学和临床变量相似。没有漏服丁丙诺啡的参与者很少报告健康的负面社会决定因素(例如:90%的人不需要帮助阅读医院的资料):讨论:讨论:这些发现加强了已知的 SDOH 作为慢性疾病(如药物使用障碍)治疗结果的有力预测因素的作用,而不仅仅是人口统计学或临床变量的作用:结论:未来的 MOUD 研究应纳入患者的观点,以便为以患者为中心的干预措施提供信息。科学意义:利用基于患者经验的策略促进丁丙诺啡剂量的一致性,可能是促进积极的 OUD 治疗结果的一个途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信