Activity of Daily Living and Walking Ability of Patients with Severe COVID-19 at Discharge from an Acute Care Hospital

Hiroe Uehara, Risa Harada, Masato Ogawa, Kodai Komaki, Daisuke Makiura, Yasumitsu Fujii, Hirokazu Onishi, Tsuyoshi Matsumoto, Ryo Yoshikawa, Yoshitada Sakai
{"title":"Activity of Daily Living and Walking Ability of Patients with Severe COVID-19 at Discharge from an Acute Care Hospital","authors":"Hiroe Uehara, Risa Harada, Masato Ogawa, Kodai Komaki, Daisuke Makiura, Yasumitsu Fujii, Hirokazu Onishi, Tsuyoshi Matsumoto, Ryo Yoshikawa, Yoshitada Sakai","doi":"10.2490/prm.20240003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objectives: The effectiveness of acute rehabilitation treatment for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has not yet been established. This study examined the efficacy of treatment provided to patients with severe COVID-19 in an acute care facility. Methods: A total of 98 patients with severe COVID-19 requiring inpatient management in our intensive care unit (ICU) were included between December 2020 and October 2021. They were divided into two groups: those who received physiotherapy (PT group; n=44) and those who did not receive physiotherapy (non-PT group; n=54). Their backgrounds, clinical characteristics, and activities of daily life (ADL) at discharge were compared to examine factors that influenced the need for physiotherapy (PT). We also evaluated the effect of PT on ADL by comparing the Barthel Index (BI) before PT and at discharge. Results: The PT group patients were significantly older, had longer hospital and ICU stays, and used invasive mechanical ventilators (IMV) more frequently than those in the non-PT group. More patients in the non-PT group were able to walk at discharge than in the PT group. The PT group patients showed significant improvement in BI and ADL at discharge when compared with BI at the start of PT, regardless of whether an IMV was used. Conclusions: Older patients with severe COVID-19 with prolonged hospitalization or ICU stay or on an IMV are prone to a decline in ADL and may need to be considered for early PT.","PeriodicalId":74584,"journal":{"name":"Progress in rehabilitation medicine","volume":"43 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in rehabilitation medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2490/prm.20240003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objectives: The effectiveness of acute rehabilitation treatment for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has not yet been established. This study examined the efficacy of treatment provided to patients with severe COVID-19 in an acute care facility. Methods: A total of 98 patients with severe COVID-19 requiring inpatient management in our intensive care unit (ICU) were included between December 2020 and October 2021. They were divided into two groups: those who received physiotherapy (PT group; n=44) and those who did not receive physiotherapy (non-PT group; n=54). Their backgrounds, clinical characteristics, and activities of daily life (ADL) at discharge were compared to examine factors that influenced the need for physiotherapy (PT). We also evaluated the effect of PT on ADL by comparing the Barthel Index (BI) before PT and at discharge. Results: The PT group patients were significantly older, had longer hospital and ICU stays, and used invasive mechanical ventilators (IMV) more frequently than those in the non-PT group. More patients in the non-PT group were able to walk at discharge than in the PT group. The PT group patients showed significant improvement in BI and ADL at discharge when compared with BI at the start of PT, regardless of whether an IMV was used. Conclusions: Older patients with severe COVID-19 with prolonged hospitalization or ICU stay or on an IMV are prone to a decline in ADL and may need to be considered for early PT.
严重 COVID-19 患者出院时的日常生活活动能力和行走能力
ABSTRACT Objectives:重症冠状病毒病 2019(COVID-19)急性康复治疗的有效性尚未确定。本研究探讨了在急症护理机构为重症 COVID-19 患者提供治疗的有效性。研究方法在 2020 年 12 月至 2021 年 10 月期间,共纳入了 98 名需要在本院重症监护室(ICU)接受住院治疗的重症 COVID-19 患者。他们被分为两组:接受物理治疗组(物理治疗组,人数=44)和未接受物理治疗组(非物理治疗组,人数=54)。我们对他们的背景、临床特征和出院时的日常生活活动(ADL)进行了比较,以研究影响物理治疗(PT)需求的因素。我们还通过比较物理治疗前和出院时的 Barthel 指数 (BI),评估了物理治疗对 ADL 的影响。结果显示与非物理治疗组相比,物理治疗组患者的年龄明显偏大,住院时间和重症监护室停留时间更长,使用有创机械呼吸机(IMV)的频率更高。出院时能行走的非 PT 组患者多于 PT 组患者。无论是否使用了有创机械通气设备,与开始接受治疗时相比,康复治疗组患者出院时的生活能力和日常活动能力均有明显改善。结论患有严重 COVID-19 的老年患者如果住院时间较长、住在重症监护室或使用 IMV,ADL 很容易下降,因此可能需要考虑早期 PT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信