Cannabis Use Differences Among Sexual Minority Versus Heterosexual Females and Males in Oklahoma: The Roles of Mental Health, Cannabis Perceptions, and Cannabis Marketing Exposure.

Katelyn F Romm, Sarah J Ehlke, Michael A Smith, Erin A Vogel, Julia McQuoid, Darla E Kendzor, Amy M Cohn
{"title":"Cannabis Use Differences Among Sexual Minority Versus Heterosexual Females and Males in Oklahoma: The Roles of Mental Health, Cannabis Perceptions, and Cannabis Marketing Exposure.","authors":"Katelyn F Romm, Sarah J Ehlke, Michael A Smith, Erin A Vogel, Julia McQuoid, Darla E Kendzor, Amy M Cohn","doi":"10.1177/29767342231208519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite the high cannabis use rates among sexual minority (SM) individuals, less research has examined factors related to cannabis use among SM (vs. heterosexual) individuals, especially in places with legal medical cannabis retail markets and high structural stigma, like Oklahoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were from a survey of Oklahoma adults, including 3020 females (18.6% SM) and 2279 males (10.1% SM). Bivariate analyses examined associations of sexual identity with cannabis-related factors (i.e., perceived harm, positive attitudes, marketing exposure, depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms) and cannabis use and use severity (i.e., past 30-day use, daily/near-daily use, cannabis use disorder [CUD] symptoms). Logistic regression examined associations of sexual identity and cannabis-related factors with cannabis use and use severity among females and males, separately.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SM (vs. heterosexual) females reported greater odds of past 30-day cannabis use and daily/near-daily use, lower harm perceptions, greater marketing exposure, and higher rates of depressive/anxiety symptoms. Lower harm perceptions and greater marketing exposure were associated with greater odds of past 30-day use, whereas marketing exposure was associated with greater odds of daily/near-daily use. SM (vs. heterosexual) males reported greater odds of daily/near-daily use and higher rates of depressive/anxiety symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SM (vs. heterosexual) females reported higher rates of cannabis use, whereas SM (vs. heterosexual) females and males reported higher rates of daily/near-daily cannabis use. Potential targets for cannabis-related health campaigns aimed at reducing use differences include correcting misinterpretations of harm that may emanate from cannabis marketing efforts among females and addressing depressive symptoms among males.</p>","PeriodicalId":516535,"journal":{"name":"Substance use & addiction journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance use & addiction journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/29767342231208519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Despite the high cannabis use rates among sexual minority (SM) individuals, less research has examined factors related to cannabis use among SM (vs. heterosexual) individuals, especially in places with legal medical cannabis retail markets and high structural stigma, like Oklahoma.

Methods: Data were from a survey of Oklahoma adults, including 3020 females (18.6% SM) and 2279 males (10.1% SM). Bivariate analyses examined associations of sexual identity with cannabis-related factors (i.e., perceived harm, positive attitudes, marketing exposure, depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms) and cannabis use and use severity (i.e., past 30-day use, daily/near-daily use, cannabis use disorder [CUD] symptoms). Logistic regression examined associations of sexual identity and cannabis-related factors with cannabis use and use severity among females and males, separately.

Results: SM (vs. heterosexual) females reported greater odds of past 30-day cannabis use and daily/near-daily use, lower harm perceptions, greater marketing exposure, and higher rates of depressive/anxiety symptoms. Lower harm perceptions and greater marketing exposure were associated with greater odds of past 30-day use, whereas marketing exposure was associated with greater odds of daily/near-daily use. SM (vs. heterosexual) males reported greater odds of daily/near-daily use and higher rates of depressive/anxiety symptoms.

Conclusions: SM (vs. heterosexual) females reported higher rates of cannabis use, whereas SM (vs. heterosexual) females and males reported higher rates of daily/near-daily cannabis use. Potential targets for cannabis-related health campaigns aimed at reducing use differences include correcting misinterpretations of harm that may emanate from cannabis marketing efforts among females and addressing depressive symptoms among males.

俄克拉荷马州性少数群体与异性恋女性和男性使用大麻的差异:心理健康、大麻认知和大麻营销接触的作用》(The Roles of Mental Health, Cannabis Perceptions, and Cannabis Marketing Exposure.
导言:尽管性少数群体(SM)中使用大麻的比例很高,但研究 SM(相对于异性恋)中使用大麻的相关因素的研究较少,尤其是在俄克拉荷马州这样拥有合法医用大麻零售市场和高度结构性污名化的地方:数据来自对俄克拉荷马州成年人的调查,包括 3020 名女性(18.6% SM)和 2279 名男性(10.1% SM)。二元分析研究了性身份与大麻相关因素(即感知危害、积极态度、营销接触、抑郁症状、焦虑症状)以及大麻使用和使用严重程度(即过去 30 天的使用情况、每日/近每日使用情况、大麻使用障碍 [CUD] 症状)之间的关联。逻辑回归分别研究了女性和男性中性身份和大麻相关因素与大麻使用和使用严重程度的关联:SM(与异性恋相比)女性在过去 30 天内吸食大麻和每天/接近每天吸食大麻的几率更高,危害感知更低,营销接触更多,抑郁/焦虑症状发生率更高。较低的危害感知和较多的营销接触与过去 30 天使用大麻的几率较高有关,而营销接触与每日/近每日使用大麻的几率较高有关。SM(与异性恋相比)男性每天/近乎每天使用的几率更大,抑郁/焦虑症状的发生率更高:SM(与异性恋)女性报告的大麻使用率较高,而SM(与异性恋)女性和男性报告的每日/近每日使用大麻的比率较高。旨在减少使用差异的大麻相关健康宣传活动的潜在目标包括纠正女性对大麻营销活动可能产生的危害的误解,以及解决男性的抑郁症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信