Alterations of the gut microbiota and fecal short-chain fatty acids in women undergoing assisted reproduction.

IF 2.1
Ni Wu, Jun Liu, Yu Sun, Xiaoxiao Fan, Tianzi Zang, Brianna N Richardson, Jinbing Bai, Yunyan Xianyu, Yanqun Liu
{"title":"Alterations of the gut microbiota and fecal short-chain fatty acids in women undergoing assisted reproduction.","authors":"Ni Wu, Jun Liu, Yu Sun, Xiaoxiao Fan, Tianzi Zang, Brianna N Richardson, Jinbing Bai, Yunyan Xianyu, Yanqun Liu","doi":"10.1071/RD23096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>The community structure of gut microbiota changes during pregnancy, which also affects the synthesis of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs). However, the distribution of gut microbiota composition and metabolite SCFA levels are poorly understood in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART).</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate the changes in gut microbiota composition and metabolic SCFAs in women who received assisted reproduction treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-three pregnant women with spontaneous pregnancy (SP) and nine with ART pregnancy were recruited to provide fecal samples. Gut microbiota abundance and SCFA levels were determined by 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene amplicon sequencing and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS).</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>The ART group showed decreased alpha diversity (the species richness or evenness in a sample). The principal coordinates analysis (a method of analysing beta diversity) showed significant difference in gut microbiota between the ART group versus the SP group (unweighted UniFrac distance, R 2 =0.04, P =0.003). Proteobacteria , Blautia and Escherichia-Shigella were enriched in the ART group, whereas the relative abundance of beneficial intestinal bacteria Faecalibacterium was lower than in the SP group. Different modes of conception were associated with several SCFAs (valeric acid (r =-0.280; P =0.017); isocaproic acid (r =-0.330; P =0.005); caproic acid (r =-0.336; P =0.004)). Significantly different SCFAs between the two groups were synchronously associated with the differential gut microbiota.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The diversity and abundance of gut microbiota and the levels of SCFAs in women undergoing ART decreased.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>The application of ART shaped the microbial composition and metabolism, which may provide critical information for understanding the biological changes that occur in women with assisted reproduction.</p>","PeriodicalId":516117,"journal":{"name":"Reproduction, fertility, and development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproduction, fertility, and development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/RD23096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: The community structure of gut microbiota changes during pregnancy, which also affects the synthesis of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs). However, the distribution of gut microbiota composition and metabolite SCFA levels are poorly understood in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART).

Aims: To evaluate the changes in gut microbiota composition and metabolic SCFAs in women who received assisted reproduction treatment.

Methods: Sixty-three pregnant women with spontaneous pregnancy (SP) and nine with ART pregnancy were recruited to provide fecal samples. Gut microbiota abundance and SCFA levels were determined by 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene amplicon sequencing and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS).

Key results: The ART group showed decreased alpha diversity (the species richness or evenness in a sample). The principal coordinates analysis (a method of analysing beta diversity) showed significant difference in gut microbiota between the ART group versus the SP group (unweighted UniFrac distance, R 2 =0.04, P =0.003). Proteobacteria , Blautia and Escherichia-Shigella were enriched in the ART group, whereas the relative abundance of beneficial intestinal bacteria Faecalibacterium was lower than in the SP group. Different modes of conception were associated with several SCFAs (valeric acid (r =-0.280; P =0.017); isocaproic acid (r =-0.330; P =0.005); caproic acid (r =-0.336; P =0.004)). Significantly different SCFAs between the two groups were synchronously associated with the differential gut microbiota.

Conclusions: The diversity and abundance of gut microbiota and the levels of SCFAs in women undergoing ART decreased.

Implications: The application of ART shaped the microbial composition and metabolism, which may provide critical information for understanding the biological changes that occur in women with assisted reproduction.

接受辅助生殖的妇女肠道微生物群和粪便短链脂肪酸的变化。
背景:妊娠期间肠道微生物群落结构会发生变化,这也会影响短链脂肪酸(SCFA)的合成。目的:评估接受辅助生殖治疗的妇女肠道微生物群组成和代谢物 SCFAs 的变化:方法:招募 63 名自然妊娠(SP)孕妇和 9 名 ART 妊娠孕妇提供粪便样本。通过 16S 核糖体 RNA(rRNA)基因扩增片测序和气相色谱-质谱法(GC-MS)测定肠道微生物群的丰度和 SCFA 水平:主要结果:ART 组的阿尔法多样性(样本中物种的丰富度或均匀度)有所下降。主坐标分析(一种分析贝塔多样性的方法)显示,ART 组与 SP 组的肠道微生物群存在显著差异(非加权 UniFrac 距离,R2=0.04,P=0.003)。ART 组富含蛋白菌、布劳氏菌和志贺氏杆菌,而有益肠道细菌粪杆菌的相对丰度低于 SP 组。不同的受孕方式与几种 SCFAs 有关(戊酸(r=-0.280;P=0.017);异己酸(r=-0.330;P=0.005);己酸(r=-0.336;P=0.004))。两组间 SCFAs 的显著差异与肠道微生物群的差异同步相关:结论:接受抗逆转录病毒疗法的女性肠道微生物群的多样性和丰度以及 SCFAs 的水平均有所下降:抗逆转录病毒疗法影响了微生物的组成和代谢,这可能为了解辅助生殖妇女的生物学变化提供了重要信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信