{"title":"Intelligent play: How improv can improve clinician's emotional intelligence","authors":"Ankit Mehta, Brett Hendel-Paterson, Nilesh Shah, Jesse Hemphill, Nell Adams, Mary Fredrickson","doi":"10.1111/tct.13730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Emotional intelligence (EI) of physicians significantly impacts their personal well-being and professional success with broad implications in health care. A focused training on EI is often lacking in medical curricula. We sought to understand the impact of improvisation training on clinicians' EI.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Approach</h3>\n \n <p>Four online medical improv workshops were offered to a diverse group of physicians with varied levels of practice experience including medicine-paediatric residents, paediatric educators, practising paediatricians and internal/family medicine clinicians. The improv training was thoughtfully curated and remained consistent for all four cohorts, lasting 2 h. Self-reported EI scales (pre and post) were captured using an online survey tool. The overall EI score and the scores of three EI components were compared before and after training.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Evaluation</h3>\n \n <p>Out of 64 participants, 41 participants (64%) completed both the pre- and post-surveys and were included in the final analysis. Participant's pre-training score (mean:123.9, range: 121.1–126.7) was compared to their post-training score (mean:128.9, range: 126.3–131.3). The <i>t</i> tests comparing EI scores showed that compared to pre-intervention, participants on average scored 4.9 points higher (95% CI: 3.1–6.7; <i>p</i> < 0.01) on the overall scale, 2.2 points higher (95% CI: 1.2–3.2; <i>p</i> < 0.01) on the appraisal score, 1.4 points higher (95% CI: 0.8–2.0; <i>p</i> < 0.01) on the regulation score and 1.2 points higher (95% CI: 0.4–2.1; <i>p</i> = 0.01) on the utilisation score.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>Improv training is an innovative method to fill the crucial gap in EI curricula. There was a statistically significant improvement in average score for clinicians' EI after a pilot improv training programme.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/tct.13730","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tct.13730","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Emotional intelligence (EI) of physicians significantly impacts their personal well-being and professional success with broad implications in health care. A focused training on EI is often lacking in medical curricula. We sought to understand the impact of improvisation training on clinicians' EI.
Approach
Four online medical improv workshops were offered to a diverse group of physicians with varied levels of practice experience including medicine-paediatric residents, paediatric educators, practising paediatricians and internal/family medicine clinicians. The improv training was thoughtfully curated and remained consistent for all four cohorts, lasting 2 h. Self-reported EI scales (pre and post) were captured using an online survey tool. The overall EI score and the scores of three EI components were compared before and after training.
Evaluation
Out of 64 participants, 41 participants (64%) completed both the pre- and post-surveys and were included in the final analysis. Participant's pre-training score (mean:123.9, range: 121.1–126.7) was compared to their post-training score (mean:128.9, range: 126.3–131.3). The t tests comparing EI scores showed that compared to pre-intervention, participants on average scored 4.9 points higher (95% CI: 3.1–6.7; p < 0.01) on the overall scale, 2.2 points higher (95% CI: 1.2–3.2; p < 0.01) on the appraisal score, 1.4 points higher (95% CI: 0.8–2.0; p < 0.01) on the regulation score and 1.2 points higher (95% CI: 0.4–2.1; p = 0.01) on the utilisation score.
Implications
Improv training is an innovative method to fill the crucial gap in EI curricula. There was a statistically significant improvement in average score for clinicians' EI after a pilot improv training programme.
背景:医生的情商(EI)对他们的个人幸福和职业成功有重大影响,并对医疗保健产生广泛影响。医学课程中往往缺乏对情商的集中培训。我们试图了解即兴表演培训对临床医生情商的影响:方法:我们为具有不同执业经验的医生提供了四个在线医学即兴表演讲习班,这些医生包括儿科住院医师、儿科教育工作者、儿科执业医师和内科/家庭医学临床医师。即兴表演培训经过精心策划,四组学员的培训时间保持一致,均为 2 小时。对培训前后的总 EI 分数和三个 EI 要素的分数进行了比较:在 64 名学员中,有 41 名学员(64%)完成了培训前后的问卷调查,并被纳入最终分析。学员的培训前得分(平均值:123.9,范围:121.1-126.7)与培训后得分(平均值:128.9,范围:126.3-131.3)进行了比较。比较 EI 分数的 t 检验显示,与干预前相比,参与者的平均得分高出 4.9 分(95% CI:3.1-6.7;P 暗示):即兴表演培训是一种创新方法,可以填补情商课程的重要空白。在试点即兴表演培训课程后,临床医生的情商平均得分有了统计学意义上的显著提高。
期刊介绍:
Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance.
Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.