The Impact of a Clinical Pharmacist Practitioner on Perioperative Pain Management for Orthopedic Surgeries.

IF 0.9 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Belal Dakroub, Abigail Brooks, Christine M Vartan, Sandra DiScala
{"title":"The Impact of a Clinical Pharmacist Practitioner on Perioperative Pain Management for Orthopedic Surgeries.","authors":"Belal Dakroub, Abigail Brooks, Christine M Vartan, Sandra DiScala","doi":"10.1080/15360288.2023.2299437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this quality improvement (QI) project was to assess the impact of an evidence based clinical pharmacist practitioner (CPP) model applied to perioperative pain management by integrating a CPP into the perioperative orthopedic surgery clinical pathway. Secondary objective was to assess the effect of CPP pain management service on surgical team satisfaction. This QI project expanded CPP pain management services for patients who were scheduled for an orthopedic surgery. Surgical provider satisfaction of CPP pain management services was assessed through a provider survey. Pain management recommendations by the Pain CPP were implemented 61% (<i>n</i> = 23/38) of the time by the orthopedic surgeon. The impact of the Pain CPP on perioperative pain management was demonstrated by improvement in the Clinically Aligned Pain Assessment Tool, which was similar in patients where CPP recommendations were accepted compared to surgeon only recommended regimens (<i>p</i> = 0.048). Five orthopedic surgical providers responded to our satisfaction survey, 80% (<i>n</i> = 4/5) strongly agree that a pain management CPP should become a permanent member of the care team. Through an evidence-based CPP model we observed a reduction in quantity of opioid prescribed and morphine equivalent daily dose utilized in patients who underwent an orthopedic surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":16645,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"84-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15360288.2023.2299437","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this quality improvement (QI) project was to assess the impact of an evidence based clinical pharmacist practitioner (CPP) model applied to perioperative pain management by integrating a CPP into the perioperative orthopedic surgery clinical pathway. Secondary objective was to assess the effect of CPP pain management service on surgical team satisfaction. This QI project expanded CPP pain management services for patients who were scheduled for an orthopedic surgery. Surgical provider satisfaction of CPP pain management services was assessed through a provider survey. Pain management recommendations by the Pain CPP were implemented 61% (n = 23/38) of the time by the orthopedic surgeon. The impact of the Pain CPP on perioperative pain management was demonstrated by improvement in the Clinically Aligned Pain Assessment Tool, which was similar in patients where CPP recommendations were accepted compared to surgeon only recommended regimens (p = 0.048). Five orthopedic surgical providers responded to our satisfaction survey, 80% (n = 4/5) strongly agree that a pain management CPP should become a permanent member of the care team. Through an evidence-based CPP model we observed a reduction in quantity of opioid prescribed and morphine equivalent daily dose utilized in patients who underwent an orthopedic surgery.

临床药剂师对骨科手术围手术期疼痛管理的影响。
该质量改进(QI)项目旨在评估循证临床药剂师(CPP)模式对围术期疼痛管理的影响,方法是将 CPP 纳入骨科手术围术期临床路径。次要目标是评估 CPP 疼痛管理服务对手术团队满意度的影响。该 QI 项目为计划接受骨科手术的患者扩大了 CPP 疼痛管理服务。手术提供者对 CPP 疼痛管理服务的满意度通过提供者调查进行评估。骨科医生在 61% 的时间(n = 23/38)内执行了疼痛治疗小组提出的疼痛治疗建议。疼痛 CPP 对围术期疼痛管理的影响体现在临床统一疼痛评估工具(Clinically Aligned Pain Assessment Tool)的改善上,在接受 CPP 建议的患者中,疼痛 CPP 的改善效果与只接受外科医生建议方案的患者相似(P = 0.048)。五名骨科手术提供者对我们的满意度调查做出了回应,80%(n = 4/5)的提供者强烈同意疼痛管理 CPP 应该成为医疗团队的永久成员。通过循证 CPP 模式,我们观察到骨科手术患者的阿片类药物处方量和吗啡当量日剂量均有所减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信