Systemic Inflammatory Marker Levels in Serous Macular Detachment Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion.

IF 1.2 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Journal of Current Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2023-12-21 eCollection Date: 2023-04-01 DOI:10.4103/joco.joco_44_23
Emine Doğan, Kübra Özata Gündoğdu, Özlem Bursalı, Erkan Çelik, Gürsoy Alagöz
{"title":"Systemic Inflammatory Marker Levels in Serous Macular Detachment Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion.","authors":"Emine Doğan, Kübra Özata Gündoğdu, Özlem Bursalı, Erkan Çelik, Gürsoy Alagöz","doi":"10.4103/joco.joco_44_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the association of systemic inflammatory marker levels in macular edema with serous macular detachment (SMD) secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients diagnosed with RVO were categorized into two groups based on the presence or absence of SMD: Group 1 included 30 eyes with SMD, while Group 2 included 30 eyes without SMD. Levels of neutrophils, monocytes, lymphocytes, thrombocytes, and mean platelet volume (MPV) were analyzed. Systemic inflammatory markers, including neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), were calculated and compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean neutrophil levels were significantly higher in Group 1 (<i>P</i> = 0.002). The mean lymphocyte, monocytes, thrombocyte, and MPV levels did not differ significantly between groups. NLR and SII levels were significantly higher in the SMD group (<i>P</i> = 0.004 and <i>P</i> = 0.016, respectively). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of PLR. The optimal receiver operator characteristic (ROC) cut-off value of NLR for SMD was calculated as 1.55 with 73% sensitivity and 63% specificity (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.714, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.584-0.845). The optimal ROC cut-off value of SII for SMD was calculated as 451.75 with 63% sensitivity and 63% specificity (AUC = 0.681, 95% CI: 0.546-0.816). In this study, branch RVO was present in 48 patients, and central RVO was present in 12 patients. Neutrophil, MPV levels, and NLR, PLR, SII ratios were similar between patients with branch and central occlusion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neutrophil levels, NLR, and SII were found to be significantly higher in eyes with SMD secondary to RVO.</p>","PeriodicalId":15423,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Current Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10795820/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Current Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joco.joco_44_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the association of systemic inflammatory marker levels in macular edema with serous macular detachment (SMD) secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO).

Methods: Patients diagnosed with RVO were categorized into two groups based on the presence or absence of SMD: Group 1 included 30 eyes with SMD, while Group 2 included 30 eyes without SMD. Levels of neutrophils, monocytes, lymphocytes, thrombocytes, and mean platelet volume (MPV) were analyzed. Systemic inflammatory markers, including neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), were calculated and compared between the two groups.

Results: The mean neutrophil levels were significantly higher in Group 1 (P = 0.002). The mean lymphocyte, monocytes, thrombocyte, and MPV levels did not differ significantly between groups. NLR and SII levels were significantly higher in the SMD group (P = 0.004 and P = 0.016, respectively). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of PLR. The optimal receiver operator characteristic (ROC) cut-off value of NLR for SMD was calculated as 1.55 with 73% sensitivity and 63% specificity (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.714, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.584-0.845). The optimal ROC cut-off value of SII for SMD was calculated as 451.75 with 63% sensitivity and 63% specificity (AUC = 0.681, 95% CI: 0.546-0.816). In this study, branch RVO was present in 48 patients, and central RVO was present in 12 patients. Neutrophil, MPV levels, and NLR, PLR, SII ratios were similar between patients with branch and central occlusion.

Conclusion: Neutrophil levels, NLR, and SII were found to be significantly higher in eyes with SMD secondary to RVO.

视网膜静脉闭塞继发浆液性黄斑脱离的全身炎症标志物水平
目的:评估黄斑水肿与继发于视网膜静脉闭塞(RVO)的浆液性黄斑脱离(SMD)的全身炎症标志物水平的关联:根据有无SMD将确诊为RVO的患者分为两组:第一组包括30只有SMD的眼睛,第二组包括30只无SMD的眼睛。分析了中性粒细胞、单核细胞、淋巴细胞、血小板和平均血小板体积(MPV)的水平。计算并比较两组的全身炎症指标,包括中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、血小板-淋巴细胞比值(PLR)和全身免疫炎症指数(SII):结果:第 1 组的平均中性粒细胞水平明显更高(P = 0.002)。各组的平均淋巴细胞、单核细胞、血小板和 MPV 水平无明显差异。SMD 组的 NLR 和 SII 水平明显更高(分别为 P = 0.004 和 P = 0.016)。在 PLR 方面,组间无明显差异。经计算,SMD 的 NLR 最佳接收器操作者特征(ROC)临界值为 1.55,灵敏度为 73%,特异度为 63%(曲线下面积 [AUC] = 0.714,95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.584-0.845):0.584-0.845).经计算,SII 对 SMD 的最佳 ROC 临界值为 451.75,灵敏度为 63%,特异度为 63%(AUC = 0.681,95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.546-0.816)。在这项研究中,48 名患者存在分支型 RVO,12 名患者存在中心型 RVO。中性粒细胞、MPV水平以及NLR、PLR、SII比率在分支型和中心型闭塞患者中相似:结论:中性粒细胞水平、NLR 和 SII 在继发于 RVO 的 SMD 患者中明显较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
45
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Peer Review under the responsibility of Iranian Society of Ophthalmology Journal of Current Ophthalmology, the official publication of the Iranian Society of Ophthalmology, is a peer-reviewed, open-access, scientific journal that welcomes high quality original articles related to vision science and all fields of ophthalmology. Journal of Current Ophthalmology is the continuum of Iranian Journal of Ophthalmology published since 1969.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信