Effect of Different Approaches to Antimicrobial Therapy with Cefmetazole and Meropenem on the Time to Defervescence in Non-Severe Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli Bacteremia.

IF 3.4 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Takanobu Hoshi, Satoshi Fujii, Kei Watanabe, Yuta Fukumura, Koji Miyazaki, Madoka Takahashi, Sakae Taniguchi, Shingo Kimura, Arisa Saito, Naoki Wada, Masaji Saijo, Kazunori Yamada, Kuninori Iwayama, Marie Itaya, Hideki Sato
{"title":"Effect of Different Approaches to Antimicrobial Therapy with Cefmetazole and Meropenem on the Time to Defervescence in Non-Severe Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing <i>Escherichia coli</i> Bacteremia.","authors":"Takanobu Hoshi, Satoshi Fujii, Kei Watanabe, Yuta Fukumura, Koji Miyazaki, Madoka Takahashi, Sakae Taniguchi, Shingo Kimura, Arisa Saito, Naoki Wada, Masaji Saijo, Kazunori Yamada, Kuninori Iwayama, Marie Itaya, Hideki Sato","doi":"10.3390/idr16010003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Carbapenems are antimicrobial agents commonly used to treat extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing bacteria. Although cefmetazole (CMZ) is considered effective for ESBL-producing <i>Escherichia coli</i> (ESBL-EC) bacteremia, previous studies showed its limitations, including the influence of the initial antimicrobial agent. Here, we examined the effects of different approaches to antimicrobial therapy with CMZ and meropenem (MEPM) on the time to defervescence in ESBL-EC bacteremia. Notably, the influence of previous antimicrobial agents was excluded. Inpatients with ESBL-EC detected in blood cultures between April 2018 and March 2023 were included and assigned to CMZ (<i>n</i> = 14), MEPM (<i>n</i> = 8), de-escalation to CMZ (dCMZ; <i>n</i> = 9), or escalation to MEPM (eMEPM; <i>n</i> = 11) groups. The median time to defervescence was 3.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 days in the CMZ, MEPM, dCMZ, and eMEPM groups, respectively, with no significant differences. Cox proportional hazards analysis showed a significant difference in the hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) of 0.378 (0.145-0.984) for the time to defervescence with CMZ versus MEPM (<i>p</i> = 0.046). The extent of a delayed time to defervescence is greater with early CMZ administration than with MEPM administration in patients with non-severe ESBL-EC bacteremia.</p>","PeriodicalId":13579,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Disease Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10801497/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Disease Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/idr16010003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Carbapenems are antimicrobial agents commonly used to treat extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing bacteria. Although cefmetazole (CMZ) is considered effective for ESBL-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-EC) bacteremia, previous studies showed its limitations, including the influence of the initial antimicrobial agent. Here, we examined the effects of different approaches to antimicrobial therapy with CMZ and meropenem (MEPM) on the time to defervescence in ESBL-EC bacteremia. Notably, the influence of previous antimicrobial agents was excluded. Inpatients with ESBL-EC detected in blood cultures between April 2018 and March 2023 were included and assigned to CMZ (n = 14), MEPM (n = 8), de-escalation to CMZ (dCMZ; n = 9), or escalation to MEPM (eMEPM; n = 11) groups. The median time to defervescence was 3.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 days in the CMZ, MEPM, dCMZ, and eMEPM groups, respectively, with no significant differences. Cox proportional hazards analysis showed a significant difference in the hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) of 0.378 (0.145-0.984) for the time to defervescence with CMZ versus MEPM (p = 0.046). The extent of a delayed time to defervescence is greater with early CMZ administration than with MEPM administration in patients with non-severe ESBL-EC bacteremia.

使用头孢美唑和美罗培南进行抗菌治疗的不同方法对非重症广谱β-乳酰胺酶产气型大肠埃希菌菌血症缓解时间的影响
碳青霉烯类是常用于治疗产扩展谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)细菌的抗菌药物。尽管头孢美唑(CMZ)被认为对产ESBL大肠埃希菌(ESBL-EC)菌血症有效,但之前的研究显示了其局限性,包括初始抗菌药物的影响。在此,我们研究了使用 CMZ 和美罗培南(MEPM)进行抗菌治疗的不同方法对 ESBL-EC 菌血症消退时间的影响。值得注意的是,该研究排除了之前使用的抗菌药物的影响。纳入了2018年4月至2023年3月期间在血液培养中检测到ESBL-EC的住院患者,并将其分配到CMZ组(n = 14)、MEPM组(n = 8)、降级至CMZ组(dCMZ;n = 9)或升级至MEPM组(eMEPM;n = 11)。CMZ组、MEPM组、dCMZ组和eMEPM组的恢复时间中位数分别为3.5天、1.0天、2.0天和4.0天,无显著差异。Cox 比例危险分析显示,CMZ 与 MEPM 相比,延迟时间的危险比(95% 置信区间)为 0.378(0.145-0.984),差异显著(p = 0.046)。在非重度ESBL-EC菌血症患者中,CMZ早期用药比MEPM用药的缓解时间延迟程度更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infectious Disease Reports
Infectious Disease Reports INFECTIOUS DISEASES-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信