Context matters: Neural processing of food-flavored e-cigarettes and the influence of smoking

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Ina M. Hellmich , Erna J.Z. Krüsemann , Joris R.H. van der Hart , Paul A.M. Smeets , Reinskje Talhout , Sanne Boesveldt
{"title":"Context matters: Neural processing of food-flavored e-cigarettes and the influence of smoking","authors":"Ina M. Hellmich ,&nbsp;Erna J.Z. Krüsemann ,&nbsp;Joris R.H. van der Hart ,&nbsp;Paul A.M. Smeets ,&nbsp;Reinskje Talhout ,&nbsp;Sanne Boesveldt","doi":"10.1016/j.biopsycho.2024.108754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>E-cigarettes are harmful, addictive, and popular. In e-cigarettes, nicotine is often paired with food-flavors. How this pairing of nicotine and food cues influences neural processing warrants investigation, as in smokers, both types of cues activate similar brain regions. Additionally, while most e-cigarettes are sweet, savory e-cigarettes are seemingly absent, although savory flavors are commonly liked in food. To understand how smoking status and type of flavor modulate reactions to food-flavored e-cigarettes, in comparison to actual food, neural and subjective responses to food odors were measured in a 2 (sweet vs. savory odor) x2 (food vs. e-cigarette context) x2 (smokers vs. non-smokers) design in 22 occasional/light smokers and 25 non-smokers. During fMRI scanning, participants were exposed to sweet and savory odors and pictures creating the two contexts. Liking and wanting were repeatedly measured on a 100-unit visual-analogue-scale. Results show that sweet e-cigarettes were liked (Δ = 14.2 ± 1.7) and wanted (Δ = 39.5 ± 3.1) more than savory e-cigarettes, and their cues activated the anterior cingulate more (cluster-level qFDR = 0.003). Further, we observed context-dependent variations in insula response to odors (cluster-level qFDR = 0.023, and = 0.030). Savory odors in an e-cigarette context were wanted less than the same odors in a food-context (Δ = 32.8 ± 3.1). Smokers and non-smokers reacted similarly to flavored product cues. Our results indicate that the principles of flavor preference in food cannot directly be applied to e-cigarettes and that it is challenging to design sweet and savory e-cigarettes to appeal to smokers only.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55372,"journal":{"name":"Biological Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301051124000139/pdfft?md5=c3673c87de0b38c03563d0b5baadc7ae&pid=1-s2.0-S0301051124000139-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301051124000139","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

E-cigarettes are harmful, addictive, and popular. In e-cigarettes, nicotine is often paired with food-flavors. How this pairing of nicotine and food cues influences neural processing warrants investigation, as in smokers, both types of cues activate similar brain regions. Additionally, while most e-cigarettes are sweet, savory e-cigarettes are seemingly absent, although savory flavors are commonly liked in food. To understand how smoking status and type of flavor modulate reactions to food-flavored e-cigarettes, in comparison to actual food, neural and subjective responses to food odors were measured in a 2 (sweet vs. savory odor) x2 (food vs. e-cigarette context) x2 (smokers vs. non-smokers) design in 22 occasional/light smokers and 25 non-smokers. During fMRI scanning, participants were exposed to sweet and savory odors and pictures creating the two contexts. Liking and wanting were repeatedly measured on a 100-unit visual-analogue-scale. Results show that sweet e-cigarettes were liked (Δ = 14.2 ± 1.7) and wanted (Δ = 39.5 ± 3.1) more than savory e-cigarettes, and their cues activated the anterior cingulate more (cluster-level qFDR = 0.003). Further, we observed context-dependent variations in insula response to odors (cluster-level qFDR = 0.023, and = 0.030). Savory odors in an e-cigarette context were wanted less than the same odors in a food-context (Δ = 32.8 ± 3.1). Smokers and non-smokers reacted similarly to flavored product cues. Our results indicate that the principles of flavor preference in food cannot directly be applied to e-cigarettes and that it is challenging to design sweet and savory e-cigarettes to appeal to smokers only.

情境很重要:食物味电子烟的神经处理与吸烟的影响
电子烟有害、易上瘾且广受欢迎。在电子烟中,尼古丁通常与食物味道搭配。尼古丁和食物线索的配对如何影响神经处理值得研究,因为在吸烟者中,这两种线索会激活类似的大脑区域。此外,虽然大多数电子烟都是甜味的,但咸味电子烟似乎并不存在,尽管咸味在食物中很常见。为了了解与实际食物相比,吸烟状态和口味类型如何调节对食物味电子烟的反应,研究人员采用2(甜味与咸味)x2(食物与电子烟背景)x2(吸烟者与非吸烟者)设计,测量了22名偶尔/轻度吸烟者和25名非吸烟者对食物气味的神经反应和主观反应。在进行 fMRI 扫描时,参与者会接触到甜味和咸味气味以及创建两种情境的图片。在 100 个单位的视觉模拟量表上反复测量喜欢和想要的程度。结果显示,甜味电子烟比咸味电子烟更受人们喜欢(Δ = 14.2 ± 1.7)和想要(Δ = 39.5 ± 3.1),而且甜味电子烟的线索更能激活前扣带回(群级qFDR = 0.003)。此外,我们还观察到脑岛对气味的反应随情境而变化(群级 qFDR = 0.023,和 = 0.030)。电子烟情境中的咸味气味比食物情境中的相同气味更不受欢迎(Δ = 32.8 ± 3.1)。吸烟者和非吸烟者对香味产品线索的反应相似。我们的研究结果表明,食物中的风味偏好原理不能直接应用于电子烟,要设计出只吸引吸烟者的甜味和咸味电子烟是具有挑战性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological Psychology
Biological Psychology 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
146
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Biological Psychology publishes original scientific papers on the biological aspects of psychological states and processes. Biological aspects include electrophysiology and biochemical assessments during psychological experiments as well as biologically induced changes in psychological function. Psychological investigations based on biological theories are also of interest. All aspects of psychological functioning, including psychopathology, are germane. The Journal concentrates on work with human subjects, but may consider work with animal subjects if conceptually related to issues in human biological psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信