An optimal skeletal element for DNA testing: Evaluation of DNA quantity and quality from various bone types in routine forensic practice

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Tomomi Otagiri, Noriko Sato, Tetsuya Shiozaki, Yuta Harayama, Momoe Matsumoto, Kanya Kobayashi, Hideki Asamura
{"title":"An optimal skeletal element for DNA testing: Evaluation of DNA quantity and quality from various bone types in routine forensic practice","authors":"Tomomi Otagiri,&nbsp;Noriko Sato,&nbsp;Tetsuya Shiozaki,&nbsp;Yuta Harayama,&nbsp;Momoe Matsumoto,&nbsp;Kanya Kobayashi,&nbsp;Hideki Asamura","doi":"10.1016/j.legalmed.2024.102415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>For human identification, the quality and quantity of DNA must be sufficient for amplification and analysis. When DNA extraction from bone tissues and teeth is required, the optimal skeletal elements should be selected as samples for DNA extraction because DNA yield differs among elements. Recently, some studies have reported that a high quantity of high-quality DNA can be extracted from the small cancellous bones of the hands and feet. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of small cancellous bones in the human identification of skeletal remains in routine forensic genetic casework. Cancellous bones [phalanges, (meta)carpal bones, and (meta)tarsal bones)] and the cortical bones (femur and petrous bones) and teeth, which have generally been recommended as samples, were collected from the same individuals that needed identifying using DNA analysis in our laboratory. The quantity of DNA from small cancellous bones tended to be higher than that from cortical bones, and the quality from the former was as high as that from the latter. This study showed that in routine forensic casework, the small cancellous bones of the hands and feet should be actively selected as samples for DNA testing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49913,"journal":{"name":"Legal Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1344622324000257/pdfft?md5=891ecce5552656a478056f273a64e694&pid=1-s2.0-S1344622324000257-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1344622324000257","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For human identification, the quality and quantity of DNA must be sufficient for amplification and analysis. When DNA extraction from bone tissues and teeth is required, the optimal skeletal elements should be selected as samples for DNA extraction because DNA yield differs among elements. Recently, some studies have reported that a high quantity of high-quality DNA can be extracted from the small cancellous bones of the hands and feet. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of small cancellous bones in the human identification of skeletal remains in routine forensic genetic casework. Cancellous bones [phalanges, (meta)carpal bones, and (meta)tarsal bones)] and the cortical bones (femur and petrous bones) and teeth, which have generally been recommended as samples, were collected from the same individuals that needed identifying using DNA analysis in our laboratory. The quantity of DNA from small cancellous bones tended to be higher than that from cortical bones, and the quality from the former was as high as that from the latter. This study showed that in routine forensic casework, the small cancellous bones of the hands and feet should be actively selected as samples for DNA testing.

用于 DNA 检测的最佳骨骼元素:对常规法医实践中不同类型骨骼的 DNA 数量和质量进行评估
要进行人体鉴定,DNA 的质量和数量必须足以进行扩增和分析。当需要从骨组织和牙齿中提取 DNA 时,应选择最佳的骨骼元素作为 DNA 提取样本,因为不同元素的 DNA 产量不同。最近,一些研究报告称,可以从手部和足部的小松质骨中提取大量高质量的 DNA。在本研究中,我们评估了在常规法医基因案件工作中,小块松质骨在遗骸人体鉴定中的有效性。我们的实验室从需要进行 DNA 分析鉴定的同一个人身上采集了松质骨(指骨、(元)腕骨和(元)跗骨)]和皮质骨(股骨和石质骨)以及牙齿,这些通常被推荐作为样本。小块松质骨的 DNA 数量往往高于皮质骨,而前者的质量也不亚于后者。这项研究表明,在日常法医案件工作中,应积极选择手部和足部的小块松质骨作为 DNA 检测样本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Legal Medicine
Legal Medicine Nursing-Issues, Ethics and Legal Aspects
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
119
审稿时长
7.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Legal Medicine provides an international forum for the publication of original articles, reviews and correspondence on subjects that cover practical and theoretical areas of interest relating to the wide range of legal medicine. Subjects covered include forensic pathology, toxicology, odontology, anthropology, criminalistics, immunochemistry, hemogenetics and forensic aspects of biological science with emphasis on DNA analysis and molecular biology. Submissions dealing with medicolegal problems such as malpractice, insurance, child abuse or ethics in medical practice are also acceptable.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信