Emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians' views on EMS-delivered interventions to promote secure firearm storage practices.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-19 DOI:10.1111/sltb.13005
Ian H Stanley, Melanie A Hom, Angela Wright
{"title":"Emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians' views on EMS-delivered interventions to promote secure firearm storage practices.","authors":"Ian H Stanley, Melanie A Hom, Angela Wright","doi":"10.1111/sltb.13005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lethal means safety counseling (LMSC) to promote secure firearm storage may reduce the risk of firearm-involved deaths, including suicide. We examined if emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians, including emergency medical technicians and paramedics, may be suitable LMSC messengers.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a web-based survey of 229 US EMS clinicians.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While few EMS clinicians supported EMS-delivered LMSC to all patients (17.0%), most supported EMS-delivered LMSC to patients in an acute suicidal crisis (64.2%) or with a known suicide attempt history (55.9%). Barriers to EMS-delivered LMSC included lack of training (73.4%), perceptions that LMSC is outside EMS clinicians' scope of practice (58.1%), and lack of standard operating procedures (56.3%). Most reported at least some interest in receiving training on EMS-delivered LMSC (67.7%). Participants holding more accurate beliefs about the link between firearm storage practices and suicide risk, as well as the efficacy of LMSC, were more likely to support EMS-delivered LMSC across patient scenarios (ORs = 2.18-5.21, ps <0.01) and express interest in receiving LMSC training (ORs = 3.78-5.43, ps <0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given that many EMS clinicians interface with patients at elevated suicide risk, targeted LMSC training may be strategic; however, research is needed to determine if and how EMS clinicians might be viable LMSC messengers.</p>","PeriodicalId":39684,"journal":{"name":"Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.13005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Lethal means safety counseling (LMSC) to promote secure firearm storage may reduce the risk of firearm-involved deaths, including suicide. We examined if emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians, including emergency medical technicians and paramedics, may be suitable LMSC messengers.

Method: We conducted a web-based survey of 229 US EMS clinicians.

Results: While few EMS clinicians supported EMS-delivered LMSC to all patients (17.0%), most supported EMS-delivered LMSC to patients in an acute suicidal crisis (64.2%) or with a known suicide attempt history (55.9%). Barriers to EMS-delivered LMSC included lack of training (73.4%), perceptions that LMSC is outside EMS clinicians' scope of practice (58.1%), and lack of standard operating procedures (56.3%). Most reported at least some interest in receiving training on EMS-delivered LMSC (67.7%). Participants holding more accurate beliefs about the link between firearm storage practices and suicide risk, as well as the efficacy of LMSC, were more likely to support EMS-delivered LMSC across patient scenarios (ORs = 2.18-5.21, ps <0.01) and express interest in receiving LMSC training (ORs = 3.78-5.43, ps <0.001).

Conclusion: Given that many EMS clinicians interface with patients at elevated suicide risk, targeted LMSC training may be strategic; however, research is needed to determine if and how EMS clinicians might be viable LMSC messengers.

急诊医疗服务(EMS)临床医生对 EMS 提供的干预措施的看法,以促进枪支安全存放做法。
导言:通过致命手段安全咨询(LMSC)来促进枪支的安全存放,可以降低枪支致死(包括自杀)的风险。我们研究了紧急医疗服务(EMS)临床医生(包括紧急医疗技术人员和护理人员)是否适合作为致命手段安全咨询的传递者:方法:我们对 229 名美国急救医疗服务临床医生进行了网络调查:尽管很少有急救医疗临床医生支持向所有患者提供急救医疗服务(17.0%),但大多数急救医疗临床医生支持向处于急性自杀危机中的患者(64.2%)或已知有自杀企图史的患者(55.9%)提供急救医疗服务。阻碍急救医疗提供 LMSC 的因素包括缺乏培训(73.4%)、认为 LMSC 超出了急救医疗临床医生的执业范围(58.1%)以及缺乏标准操作程序(56.3%)。大多数人表示至少有兴趣接受急救医疗服务提供的 LMSC 培训(67.7%)。对于枪支存放方式与自杀风险之间的联系以及 LMSC 的有效性持有更准确看法的参与者更有可能支持由急救医疗服务提供的 LMSC(ORs = 2.18-5.21,Ps 结论:鉴于许多急救医疗服务临床医生都会接触到自杀风险较高的患者,有针对性的 LMSC 培训可能具有战略意义;但是,还需要开展研究,以确定急救医疗服务临床医生是否以及如何成为可行的 LMSC 信息传递者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: An excellent resource for researchers as well as students, Social Cognition features reports on empirical research, self-perception, self-concept, social neuroscience, person-memory integration, social schemata, the development of social cognition, and the role of affect in memory and perception. Three broad concerns define the scope of the journal: - The processes underlying the perception, memory, and judgment of social stimuli - The effects of social, cultural, and affective factors on the processing of information - The behavioral and interpersonal consequences of cognitive processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信