Improving Concussion Education: Do Athletic Trainers' Opinions Match Expert Consensus?

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Julia D Drattell, Emily Kroshus, Johna K Register-Mihalik, Christopher D'Lauro, Julianne D Schmidt
{"title":"Improving Concussion Education: Do Athletic Trainers' Opinions Match Expert Consensus?","authors":"Julia D Drattell, Emily Kroshus, Johna K Register-Mihalik, Christopher D'Lauro, Julianne D Schmidt","doi":"10.4085/1062-6050-0486.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>The National Collegiate Athletic Association and Department of Defense (NCAA-DoD) Mind Matters Challenge created \"useful and feasible\" consensus recommendations to improve concussion care-seeking behavior in collegiate athletes and military cadets. Given athletic trainers' (ATs') role as providers of concussion education and medical care, it is important to understand if they agree with the expert panel that the recommendations are useful and feasible.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe and compare the perceptions of ATs in the secondary school (SS) and collegiate settings of the utility and feasibility of the NCAA-DoD Mind Matters Challenge recommendations on improving concussion education.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Electronic survey.</p><p><strong>Patients or other participants: </strong>Five hundred fifteen (515) ATs (age = 40.7 ± 12.4 years, 53.1% female gender) practicing in the SS (60.6%) or collegiate (38.4%) setting.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure(s): </strong>An online survey asked participants about their awareness of the statement followed by 17 pairs of Likert-item questions regarding each recommendation's utility and feasibility with responses ranging from no (1) to yes (9). Mimicking the consensus process, we defined consensus as a mean rating of ≥7.00. We compared utility and feasibility rating responses between SS and collegiate setting participants using Mann-Whitney U tests with α = .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two-thirds (66.6%) of participants were unaware of the consensus statement. Participants felt all recommendations were useful (all means ≥ 7.0); however, 4 recommendations related to collaborating with stakeholders did not meet the feasibility cutoff (mean range = 6.66-6.84). Secondary school ATs rated lower feasibility related to educational content (P value range = .001-.014), providing patient education throughout recovery (P = .002), and promoting peer intervention (P = .019) but higher utility (P = .007) and feasibility (P = .002) for providing parent education than collegiate ATs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The NCAA-DoD Mind Matters Challenge recommendations require further dissemination. Athletic trainers rated collaboration with stakeholders as a feasibility barrier. Secondary school ATs require more resources for educational content, messaging, and promoting peer intervention but find educating athletes' parents more useful and feasible than collegiate ATs.</p>","PeriodicalId":54875,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Athletic Training","volume":" ","pages":"801-808"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11340673/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Athletic Training","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-0486.23","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: The National Collegiate Athletic Association and Department of Defense (NCAA-DoD) Mind Matters Challenge created "useful and feasible" consensus recommendations to improve concussion care-seeking behavior in collegiate athletes and military cadets. Given athletic trainers' (ATs') role as providers of concussion education and medical care, it is important to understand if they agree with the expert panel that the recommendations are useful and feasible.

Objective: To describe and compare the perceptions of ATs in the secondary school (SS) and collegiate settings of the utility and feasibility of the NCAA-DoD Mind Matters Challenge recommendations on improving concussion education.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Setting: Electronic survey.

Patients or other participants: Five hundred fifteen (515) ATs (age = 40.7 ± 12.4 years, 53.1% female gender) practicing in the SS (60.6%) or collegiate (38.4%) setting.

Main outcome measure(s): An online survey asked participants about their awareness of the statement followed by 17 pairs of Likert-item questions regarding each recommendation's utility and feasibility with responses ranging from no (1) to yes (9). Mimicking the consensus process, we defined consensus as a mean rating of ≥7.00. We compared utility and feasibility rating responses between SS and collegiate setting participants using Mann-Whitney U tests with α = .05.

Results: Two-thirds (66.6%) of participants were unaware of the consensus statement. Participants felt all recommendations were useful (all means ≥ 7.0); however, 4 recommendations related to collaborating with stakeholders did not meet the feasibility cutoff (mean range = 6.66-6.84). Secondary school ATs rated lower feasibility related to educational content (P value range = .001-.014), providing patient education throughout recovery (P = .002), and promoting peer intervention (P = .019) but higher utility (P = .007) and feasibility (P = .002) for providing parent education than collegiate ATs.

Conclusions: The NCAA-DoD Mind Matters Challenge recommendations require further dissemination. Athletic trainers rated collaboration with stakeholders as a feasibility barrier. Secondary school ATs require more resources for educational content, messaging, and promoting peer intervention but find educating athletes' parents more useful and feasible than collegiate ATs.

改进脑震荡教育:运动训练员的意见与专家共识一致吗?
背景:美国国家大学生体育协会(NCAA)-国防部 "心灵事务挑战赛 "提出了 "有用且可行 "的共识建议,以改善大学生运动员和军校学员寻求脑震荡治疗的行为。鉴于运动训练员(ATs)作为脑震荡教育和医疗服务提供者的角色,了解他们是否同意专家小组的建议是有用和可行的非常重要:目的:描述并比较中学(SS)和大学环境中的运动师对 NCAA-DoD Mind Matters Challenge 关于改善脑震荡教育的建议的实用性和可行性的看法:设计:横断面研究:患者或其他参与者主要结果测量指标:通过在线调查询问参与者对声明的了解程度,然后就每条建议的实用性和可行性提出 17 对李克特问题,回答从否(1)到是(9)不等。模仿达成共识的过程,我们将共识定义为平均评分≥7.00。我们使用 Mann-Whitney U 检验(ι=.05)比较了 SS 和大学环境参与者的实用性和可行性评分:结果:三分之二(66.6%)的参与者不了解共识声明。参与者认为所有建议都是有用的(所有平均值均≥7.0);然而,与利益相关者合作相关的 4 项建议未达到可行性临界值(平均值范围=6.66-6.84)。与大学生助教相比,高中助教对教育内容(p 值范围=.001-.014)、在整个康复过程中提供患者教育(p=.002)和促进同伴干预(p=.019)的可行性评价较低,但对提供家长教育的效用(p=.007)和可行性(p=.002)评价较高:结论:NCAA-DoD Mind Matters Challenge 的建议需要进一步推广。ATs 将与利益相关者的合作评为可行性障碍。高中体育教师在教育内容、信息传递和促进同伴干预方面需要更多资源,但他们认为对运动员家长进行教育比大学体育教师更有用、更可行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Athletic Training
Journal of Athletic Training 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
106
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The mission of the Journal of Athletic Training is to enhance communication among professionals interested in the quality of health care for the physically active through education and research in prevention, evaluation, management and rehabilitation of injuries. The Journal of Athletic Training offers research you can use in daily practice. It keeps you abreast of scientific advancements that ultimately define professional standards of care - something you can''t be without if you''re responsible for the well-being of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信