Facial symmetry perception and attractiveness ratings in body dysmorphic disorder

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Rebecca Onken , Davide Capponi , Fanny Alexandra Dietel , Clea Kneipp , Laura Hoppen , Claudia Schulz , Dieter Dirksen , Ulrike Buhlmann
{"title":"Facial symmetry perception and attractiveness ratings in body dysmorphic disorder","authors":"Rebecca Onken ,&nbsp;Davide Capponi ,&nbsp;Fanny Alexandra Dietel ,&nbsp;Clea Kneipp ,&nbsp;Laura Hoppen ,&nbsp;Claudia Schulz ,&nbsp;Dieter Dirksen ,&nbsp;Ulrike Buhlmann","doi":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cognitive-behavioral models of body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) conceptualize biases in visual information processing as maintaining factors of the disorder. Empirical findings point to selective attentional mechanisms and a detail-oriented information processing style in facial perception, which are related to perceived facial aesthetics. However, so far, it remains unclear whether higher discrimination abilities of facial symmetry and related attractiveness ratings contribute to the mind as a filter in BDD. BDD (<em>n</em> = 25) and mentally healthy subjects (<em>n</em> = 25) rated symmetry and attractiveness of fifty animated, three-dimensional facial photographs characterized by diverging geometrical symmetry. Main findings emerging from mixed effects models indicated that perceived symmetry, but not objective symmetry, predicted perceived attractiveness. Group status did not predict symmetry or attractiveness ratings. Exploratory analyses indicated potentially clinically relevant mechanisms of symmetry ratings in BDD and revealed faster attractiveness ratings in unattractive vs. attractive faces across groups. Our findings refute the hypothesis of higher discrimination abilities of facial symmetry as a maintaining factor in BDD. Implications for attention and perception retraining in the context of cognitive-behavioral therapy for BDD are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211364924000034/pdfft?md5=9208a456ba246b22f8ebd80ec4fa9215&pid=1-s2.0-S2211364924000034-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211364924000034","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cognitive-behavioral models of body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) conceptualize biases in visual information processing as maintaining factors of the disorder. Empirical findings point to selective attentional mechanisms and a detail-oriented information processing style in facial perception, which are related to perceived facial aesthetics. However, so far, it remains unclear whether higher discrimination abilities of facial symmetry and related attractiveness ratings contribute to the mind as a filter in BDD. BDD (n = 25) and mentally healthy subjects (n = 25) rated symmetry and attractiveness of fifty animated, three-dimensional facial photographs characterized by diverging geometrical symmetry. Main findings emerging from mixed effects models indicated that perceived symmetry, but not objective symmetry, predicted perceived attractiveness. Group status did not predict symmetry or attractiveness ratings. Exploratory analyses indicated potentially clinically relevant mechanisms of symmetry ratings in BDD and revealed faster attractiveness ratings in unattractive vs. attractive faces across groups. Our findings refute the hypothesis of higher discrimination abilities of facial symmetry as a maintaining factor in BDD. Implications for attention and perception retraining in the context of cognitive-behavioral therapy for BDD are discussed.

身体畸形障碍患者的面部对称感和吸引力评级
身体畸形障碍(BDD)的认知行为模型将视觉信息处理的偏差概念化为该障碍的维持因素。实证研究结果表明,面部感知中的选择性注意机制和以细节为导向的信息处理方式与感知到的面部美感有关。然而,迄今为止,对面部对称性和相关吸引力评级的较高辨别能力是否会导致心理成为 BDD 的过滤器,这一点仍不清楚。BDD 受试者(25 人)和心理健康受试者(25 人)对 50 张以几何对称性发散为特征的三维动画面部照片的对称性和吸引力进行了评分。混合效应模型得出的主要结果表明,感知对称性(而非客观对称性)可预测感知吸引力。群体地位并不能预测对称性或吸引力评分。探索性分析表明了 BDD 中对称性评分的潜在临床相关机制,并揭示了不同群体对无吸引力面孔和有吸引力面孔的吸引力评分更快。我们的研究结果驳斥了将面部对称性的较高辨别能力作为 BDD 维持因素的假设。我们还讨论了在认知行为疗法的背景下对 BDD 进行注意力和知觉再训练的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信