Knowledge Innovation Ecosystem for the Promotion of User-Centre Health Innovations: Living Lab Methodology and Lessons Learned Through the Proposal of Standard Good Practices
Natacha Rosa, Sofia Leite, Juliana Alves, Angela Carvalho, Diana Oliveira, Flavia Santos, Barbara Macedo, Hugo Prazeres
{"title":"Knowledge Innovation Ecosystem for the Promotion of User-Centre Health Innovations: Living Lab Methodology and Lessons Learned Through the Proposal of Standard Good Practices","authors":"Natacha Rosa, Sofia Leite, Juliana Alves, Angela Carvalho, Diana Oliveira, Flavia Santos, Barbara Macedo, Hugo Prazeres","doi":"10.1101/2024.01.17.573578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Living Labs, experiencing a global surge in popularity over the past years, demands standardized guidance through the development of widely accepted good practices. While challenging due to the complex and evolving nature of Living Labs, this task remains essential. These knowledge innovation ecosystems facilitate a diverse array of interconnected and interacting end-users and stakeholder partners who engage collaboratively to co-create, embed, and/or leverage end-user-centric breakthroughs at one or more innovation phases within a real-world context. Based on the development of six Living Labs in the health domain, this study proposes a more general yet critical set of Living Labs' good practices, emphasizing the importance of strong initial marketing and promotion strategies for Living Labs' open calls, enforcing gender equality, carefully selecting stakeholders, devising and implementing effective framework strategies for end-user engagement and value creation, ensuring value creation for all Living Labs partners, prolonging the long-term viability of the Living Lab project, promoting and disseminating impactful actions and results, fostering environmental sustainability, and processing results data for Living Lab performance evaluation.","PeriodicalId":501568,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv - Scientific Communication and Education","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv - Scientific Communication and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.17.573578","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Living Labs, experiencing a global surge in popularity over the past years, demands standardized guidance through the development of widely accepted good practices. While challenging due to the complex and evolving nature of Living Labs, this task remains essential. These knowledge innovation ecosystems facilitate a diverse array of interconnected and interacting end-users and stakeholder partners who engage collaboratively to co-create, embed, and/or leverage end-user-centric breakthroughs at one or more innovation phases within a real-world context. Based on the development of six Living Labs in the health domain, this study proposes a more general yet critical set of Living Labs' good practices, emphasizing the importance of strong initial marketing and promotion strategies for Living Labs' open calls, enforcing gender equality, carefully selecting stakeholders, devising and implementing effective framework strategies for end-user engagement and value creation, ensuring value creation for all Living Labs partners, prolonging the long-term viability of the Living Lab project, promoting and disseminating impactful actions and results, fostering environmental sustainability, and processing results data for Living Lab performance evaluation.