Bond Strength to Lithium-Disilicate Ceramic after Different Surface Cleaning Approaches.

Federico Del Bianco, Claudia Mazzitelli, Tatjana Maravic, Uros Josic, Federica Florenzano, Paolo Baldissara, Lorenzo Breschi, Annalisa Mazzoni
{"title":"Bond Strength to Lithium-Disilicate Ceramic after Different Surface Cleaning Approaches.","authors":"Federico Del Bianco, Claudia Mazzitelli, Tatjana Maravic, Uros Josic, Federica Florenzano, Paolo Baldissara, Lorenzo Breschi, Annalisa Mazzoni","doi":"10.3290/j.jad.b4874329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effect of different lithium-disilicate (LiSi) glass-ceramic surface decontamination procedures on the shear bond strength (SBS) to resin cement.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Seventy CAD/CAM LiSi ceramic specimens (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar) were cut and sintered. Fifty specimens were treated with 5% hydrofluoric acid (HF) for 20 s, while 20 were left untreated. All 70 specimens were then contaminated with human saliva and try-in silicone paste. The following surface cleaning methods were investigated (n = 10): C: water rinsing (control); PA: 37% H3PO4 etching for 20 s; E: 70% ethanol applied for 20 s; CP: cleaning paste (Ivoclean, Ivoclar) brushed for 20 s; HFSEP: self-etching ceramic primer (Monobond Etch&Prime, Ivoclar) rubbed for 20 s; HF: 5% HF applied for 20 s or no HF etching prior to contamination; SEP: self-etching ceramic primer rubbed for 20 s and no HF etching prior to contamination. Composite cylinders were created and luted with an adhesive resin cement to the decontaminated surfaces. After storage for 24 h at 37°C, the SBS test was conducted. Two fractured specimens per group were observed under SEM to perform fractographic analysis. The data were statistically analyzed with p set at <0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The type of surface cleaning approach influenced bond strength (p < 0.001). HFSEP, SEP, and HF attained higher SBS (p < 0.001) compared to other groups. None of the approaches were able to completely remove contaminants from the ceramic surfaces. SEM images showed residual traces of contaminants on CP-treated surfaces.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The self-etching ceramic primer enhanced bond strength to contaminated LiSi ceramic surfaces, irrespective of previous treatment with hydrofluoric acid.</p>","PeriodicalId":94234,"journal":{"name":"The journal of adhesive dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of adhesive dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.b4874329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of different lithium-disilicate (LiSi) glass-ceramic surface decontamination procedures on the shear bond strength (SBS) to resin cement.

Materials and methods: Seventy CAD/CAM LiSi ceramic specimens (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar) were cut and sintered. Fifty specimens were treated with 5% hydrofluoric acid (HF) for 20 s, while 20 were left untreated. All 70 specimens were then contaminated with human saliva and try-in silicone paste. The following surface cleaning methods were investigated (n = 10): C: water rinsing (control); PA: 37% H3PO4 etching for 20 s; E: 70% ethanol applied for 20 s; CP: cleaning paste (Ivoclean, Ivoclar) brushed for 20 s; HFSEP: self-etching ceramic primer (Monobond Etch&Prime, Ivoclar) rubbed for 20 s; HF: 5% HF applied for 20 s or no HF etching prior to contamination; SEP: self-etching ceramic primer rubbed for 20 s and no HF etching prior to contamination. Composite cylinders were created and luted with an adhesive resin cement to the decontaminated surfaces. After storage for 24 h at 37°C, the SBS test was conducted. Two fractured specimens per group were observed under SEM to perform fractographic analysis. The data were statistically analyzed with p set at <0.05.

Results: The type of surface cleaning approach influenced bond strength (p < 0.001). HFSEP, SEP, and HF attained higher SBS (p < 0.001) compared to other groups. None of the approaches were able to completely remove contaminants from the ceramic surfaces. SEM images showed residual traces of contaminants on CP-treated surfaces.

Conclusions: The self-etching ceramic primer enhanced bond strength to contaminated LiSi ceramic surfaces, irrespective of previous treatment with hydrofluoric acid.

不同表面清洁方法后与二硅酸锂陶瓷的粘接强度
目的:评估不同的二硅酸锂(LiSi)玻璃陶瓷表面去污程序对树脂水门汀剪切粘结强度(SBS)的影响:切割并烧结 70 个 CAD/CAM LiSi 陶瓷试样(IPS e.max CAD,Ivoclar)。用 5% 的氢氟酸 (HF) 处理 50 个试样 20 秒,20 个试样不处理。然后用人类唾液和硅胶浆污染所有 70 个试样。研究了以下表面清洁方法(n = 10):C:水冲洗(对照组);PA:37% H3PO4 蚀刻 20 秒;E:70% 乙醇涂抹 20 秒;CP:清洁膏(Ivoclean,Ivoclar)刷洗 20 秒;HFSEP:自蚀陶瓷底漆(Monobond Etch&Prime,Ivoclar)摩擦 20 秒;HF:5% HF 涂抹 20 秒或污染前不进行 HF 蚀刻;SEP:自蚀陶瓷底漆摩擦 20 秒,污染前不进行 HF 蚀刻。制作复合材料圆柱体,并用树脂粘合剂将其粘接到已去污的表面。在 37°C 下存放 24 小时后,进行 SBS 测试。在扫描电镜下观察每组两个断裂的试样,进行断口分析。对数据进行了统计分析,P 为结果:表面清洁方法的类型会影响粘接强度(p < 0.001)。与其他组相比,HFSEP、SEP 和 HF 可获得更高的 SBS(p < 0.001)。没有一种方法能完全清除陶瓷表面的污染物。SEM 图像显示,CP 处理过的表面上仍有污染物残留:自酸蚀处理陶瓷底漆增强了受污染的 LiSi 陶瓷表面的粘接强度,与之前使用氢氟酸处理无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信