The “Sniffin’ Kids-PT” test: A smell test variant for Portuguese children

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
J.P. Carneiro , J.C. Carvalho , S.P. Carneiro , I. Eloi , C. Silva , L. Silva , T. Hummel , J.C. Ribeiro
{"title":"The “Sniffin’ Kids-PT” test: A smell test variant for Portuguese children","authors":"J.P. Carneiro ,&nbsp;J.C. Carvalho ,&nbsp;S.P. Carneiro ,&nbsp;I. Eloi ,&nbsp;C. Silva ,&nbsp;L. Silva ,&nbsp;T. Hummel ,&nbsp;J.C. Ribeiro","doi":"10.1016/j.anorl.2023.12.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Olfactory tests tailored for children are essential, as diagnosing olfactory dysfunction at these ages can be challenging. The 16-item “Sniffin’ Sticks” is reliable and easy to perform. To the best of our knowledge, there is currently no validated olfactory test for the Portuguese pediatric population. This study aimed to adapt and validate the “Sniffin’ Sticks” olfactory test for the Portuguese pediatric population.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Between August 2020 and September 2021, 354 children aged between 6 and 17<!--> <!-->years old enrolled in the study, 336 healthy children with a normal sense of smell, and 18 anosmic children with Kallmann syndrome. The study consisted of two parts. Firstly, the “Sniffin’ Sticks” olfactory identification test was applied to healthy children and the odors with statistically significant low identification rates were excluded. A modified version of “Sniffin’ Sticks” was defined and named “Sniffin’ Kids-PT” test. Secondly, normative data were assessed and test-retest and validation tests were performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Apple and Cloves odors were identified with a low rate and were excluded from the “Sniffin’ Sticks” olfactory test. In the modified 14-item “Sniffin’ Kids-PT”, scoring &lt;<!--> <!-->6 (from 6–8<!--> <!-->years old), &lt;<!--> <!-->7 (from 9–11<!--> <!-->years old) or &lt;<!--> <!-->8 (from 12–14<!--> <!-->years old and 15–17<!--> <!-->years old) was indicative of olfactory dysfunction. The test–retest reliability was good (<em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.81; <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001) and the differences between scores of healthy children and anosmic children were statistically significant (U213<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->13.00; <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The modified “Sniffin’ Kids-PT” is a reliable test to discriminate between normosmia and olfactory dysfunction in Portuguese children over 5<!--> <!-->years old.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879729624000012/pdfft?md5=f877af0a36c2b7d689272dc985820105&pid=1-s2.0-S1879729624000012-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879729624000012","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Olfactory tests tailored for children are essential, as diagnosing olfactory dysfunction at these ages can be challenging. The 16-item “Sniffin’ Sticks” is reliable and easy to perform. To the best of our knowledge, there is currently no validated olfactory test for the Portuguese pediatric population. This study aimed to adapt and validate the “Sniffin’ Sticks” olfactory test for the Portuguese pediatric population.

Methods

Between August 2020 and September 2021, 354 children aged between 6 and 17 years old enrolled in the study, 336 healthy children with a normal sense of smell, and 18 anosmic children with Kallmann syndrome. The study consisted of two parts. Firstly, the “Sniffin’ Sticks” olfactory identification test was applied to healthy children and the odors with statistically significant low identification rates were excluded. A modified version of “Sniffin’ Sticks” was defined and named “Sniffin’ Kids-PT” test. Secondly, normative data were assessed and test-retest and validation tests were performed.

Results

Apple and Cloves odors were identified with a low rate and were excluded from the “Sniffin’ Sticks” olfactory test. In the modified 14-item “Sniffin’ Kids-PT”, scoring < 6 (from 6–8 years old), < 7 (from 9–11 years old) or < 8 (from 12–14 years old and 15–17 years old) was indicative of olfactory dysfunction. The test–retest reliability was good (r = 0.81; P < 0.001) and the differences between scores of healthy children and anosmic children were statistically significant (U213 = 13.00; P < 0.001).

Conclusion

The modified “Sniffin’ Kids-PT” is a reliable test to discriminate between normosmia and olfactory dysfunction in Portuguese children over 5 years old.

嗅觉儿童测试":葡萄牙儿童嗅觉测试变体
目的:为儿童量身定制的嗅觉测试非常重要,因为诊断这些年龄段儿童的嗅觉功能障碍具有挑战性。由 16 个项目组成的 "嗅觉测试棒 "既可靠又易于操作。据我们所知,目前还没有针对葡萄牙儿童的有效嗅觉测试。本研究旨在针对葡萄牙儿科人群改编和验证 "嗅觉棒 "嗅觉测试:2020年8月至2021年9月期间,354名6至17岁的儿童参加了研究,其中336名健康儿童嗅觉正常,18名患有卡尔曼综合征的无嗅儿童。研究包括两个部分。首先,对健康儿童进行了 "嗅觉棒 "嗅觉识别测试,并排除了识别率明显偏低的气味。最终确定了 "嗅觉棒 "的改进版,并命名为 "嗅觉儿童-PT "测试。其次,评估了常模数据,并进行了重复测试和验证测试:结果:苹果和丁香气味的识别率较低,被排除在 "嗅觉棒 "嗅觉测试之外。在修改后的 14 个项目的 "儿童嗅觉测试 "中,评分结论是:"儿童嗅觉测试 "的评分结果与 "儿童嗅觉测试 "的评分结果一致:修改后的 "儿童嗅觉测试 "是区分 5 岁以上葡萄牙儿童嗅觉正常和嗅觉障碍的可靠测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信