Benefits and barriers to return to education and relationship to quality of life for people living with spinal cord injury: Results of a mixed methods study.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-19 DOI:10.1080/10790268.2023.2294520
Shelly Hsieh, Adria De Simone, Trevor Dyson-Hudson, John O'Neill, Amanda Botticello, Ada Chen, Steven Kirshblum
{"title":"Benefits and barriers to return to education and relationship to quality of life for people living with spinal cord injury: Results of a mixed methods study.","authors":"Shelly Hsieh, Adria De Simone, Trevor Dyson-Hudson, John O'Neill, Amanda Botticello, Ada Chen, Steven Kirshblum","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2023.2294520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>There is limited research on return to education (RTE) after spinal cord injury (SCI). As a result, few programs exist to help people achieve this goal.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary objective was to investigate the barriers and facilitators to RTE, and the relationship between RTE and quality of life (QOL). The secondary objective was to examine the role of a Vocational Resource Facilitation (VRF) program on RTE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed methods approach with a semi-structured interview and online survey was used. Participants included 15 people with SCI with RTE goals who received VRF services at an acute inpatient rehabilitation hospital. Qualitative responses on the barriers, facilitators and perceived benefits of RTE were analyzed using a grounded theory strategy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Barriers to RTE included physical and mental health, transportation, time, environmental barriers, finances, lack of knowledge about available resources, and discrimination. Facilitators to RTE included the VRF program, social support, financial support, virtual learning, organizational support, and policy constructs. People who RTE after SCI reported better QOL, less depressed mood than those who did not, and were more likely to have returned to work.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlighted common barriers and facilitators to RTE, and potential areas of intervention. VRF is a potentially efficacious early intervention vocational rehabilitation approach that improves participation in education and employment for people with SCI. People who received VRF and achieved RTE may have better QOL outcomes and improved employability.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"327-337"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11864026/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2023.2294520","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: There is limited research on return to education (RTE) after spinal cord injury (SCI). As a result, few programs exist to help people achieve this goal.

Objective: The primary objective was to investigate the barriers and facilitators to RTE, and the relationship between RTE and quality of life (QOL). The secondary objective was to examine the role of a Vocational Resource Facilitation (VRF) program on RTE.

Methods: A mixed methods approach with a semi-structured interview and online survey was used. Participants included 15 people with SCI with RTE goals who received VRF services at an acute inpatient rehabilitation hospital. Qualitative responses on the barriers, facilitators and perceived benefits of RTE were analyzed using a grounded theory strategy.

Results: Barriers to RTE included physical and mental health, transportation, time, environmental barriers, finances, lack of knowledge about available resources, and discrimination. Facilitators to RTE included the VRF program, social support, financial support, virtual learning, organizational support, and policy constructs. People who RTE after SCI reported better QOL, less depressed mood than those who did not, and were more likely to have returned to work.

Conclusions: This study highlighted common barriers and facilitators to RTE, and potential areas of intervention. VRF is a potentially efficacious early intervention vocational rehabilitation approach that improves participation in education and employment for people with SCI. People who received VRF and achieved RTE may have better QOL outcomes and improved employability.

脊髓损伤患者重返教育的益处和障碍以及与生活质量的关系:混合方法研究的结果。
背景:有关脊髓损伤(SCI)后重返校园(RTE)的研究十分有限。因此,帮助人们实现这一目标的计划寥寥无几:首要目标是调查重返教育的障碍和促进因素,以及重返教育与生活质量(QOL)之间的关系。次要目标是研究职业资源促进计划(VRF)对职业康复和就业的作用:采用半结构式访谈和在线调查的混合方法。参与者包括 15 名在一家急性住院康复医院接受职业资源促进服务的、以康复治疗为目标的 SCI 患者。采用基础理论策略分析了有关康复治疗的障碍、促进因素和感知益处的定性回答:康复治疗的障碍包括身心健康、交通、时间、环境障碍、经济、对可用资源缺乏了解以及歧视。促进康复和远程教育的因素包括康复和远程教育计划、社会支持、经济支持、虚拟学习、组织支持和政策建设。与没有接受康复治疗的人相比,接受过康复治疗的人的生活质量更高,抑郁情绪更少,而且更有可能重返工作岗位:本研究强调了康复治疗的常见障碍和促进因素,以及潜在的干预领域。职业康复框架是一种潜在有效的早期干预职业康复方法,可提高 SCI 患者的教育和就业参与度。接受职业康复治疗并实现康复就业的患者可能会获得更好的生活质量和就业能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信