Development of a common dyadic coping scale in couples facing breast cancer: the importance of open communication.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Journal of Psychosocial Oncology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-19 DOI:10.1080/07347332.2024.2303523
Wenjia Liu, Frances Marcus Lewis, Min Li, Ira Kantrowitz-Gordon
{"title":"Development of a common dyadic coping scale in couples facing breast cancer: the importance of open communication.","authors":"Wenjia Liu, Frances Marcus Lewis, Min Li, Ira Kantrowitz-Gordon","doi":"10.1080/07347332.2024.2303523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Couples' joint coping is important in managing the impact of breast cancer. However, measures assessing couples' communication as a way of coping are insufficient. This study aimed to generate a self-report valid and reliable measure of couples' coping with a particular focus on communication.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We used baseline data of 343 couple dyads who participated in a randomized clinical trial targeting marital communication. Women were diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer in the past eight months; couples were married or in an intimate relationship for at least six months, could read and write English, and lived within 100 miles of the study center. An expert panel selected items with conceptual fit from the Mutuality and Interpersonal Sensitivity Scale (MIS) that was originally designed to evaluate marital communication about breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported a 12-item measurement model with four factors: <i>Keeping the communication open with each other about breast cancer</i> (4 items), <i>Sharing a positive outlook on breast cancer</i> (2 items), <i>Avoiding discussion of negative thoughts and feelings about breast cancer</i> (3 items), and <i>Spending sufficient time together talking about breast cancer</i> (3 items). Reliability ranged from 0.76 to 0.87 for women and 0.70 to 0.83 for spouses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This new measure has potential application in clinical practice and future research to assess couple's joint coping efforts especially through communication.</p>","PeriodicalId":47451,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosocial Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"604-621"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychosocial Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2024.2303523","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Couples' joint coping is important in managing the impact of breast cancer. However, measures assessing couples' communication as a way of coping are insufficient. This study aimed to generate a self-report valid and reliable measure of couples' coping with a particular focus on communication.

Method: We used baseline data of 343 couple dyads who participated in a randomized clinical trial targeting marital communication. Women were diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer in the past eight months; couples were married or in an intimate relationship for at least six months, could read and write English, and lived within 100 miles of the study center. An expert panel selected items with conceptual fit from the Mutuality and Interpersonal Sensitivity Scale (MIS) that was originally designed to evaluate marital communication about breast cancer.

Results: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported a 12-item measurement model with four factors: Keeping the communication open with each other about breast cancer (4 items), Sharing a positive outlook on breast cancer (2 items), Avoiding discussion of negative thoughts and feelings about breast cancer (3 items), and Spending sufficient time together talking about breast cancer (3 items). Reliability ranged from 0.76 to 0.87 for women and 0.70 to 0.83 for spouses.

Conclusion: This new measure has potential application in clinical practice and future research to assess couple's joint coping efforts especially through communication.

在面临乳腺癌的夫妇中编制共同的夫妻应对量表:坦诚交流的重要性。
目的:夫妻共同应对乳腺癌的影响非常重要。然而,对夫妻沟通作为一种应对方式的评估措施还不够充分。本研究旨在对夫妻应对乳腺癌的方式进行有效、可靠的自我报告,并特别关注夫妻间的沟通:我们使用了 343 对夫妇的基线数据,这些夫妇参加了一项以婚姻沟通为目标的随机临床试验。女性在过去八个月内被诊断出患有早期乳腺癌;夫妻双方已婚或有至少六个月的亲密关系,会读写英语,居住地距离研究中心在 100 英里以内。一个专家小组从相互性和人际关系敏感性量表(MIS)中挑选出了概念上合适的项目,该量表最初是为评估有关乳腺癌的婚姻沟通而设计的:结果:探索性和确认性因素分析支持一个包含四个因素的 12 个项目测量模型:在乳腺癌问题上保持坦诚交流(4 个项目)、分享对乳腺癌的积极看法(2 个项目)、避免讨论有关乳腺癌的负面想法和感受(3 个项目)以及花足够的时间共同讨论乳腺癌(3 个项目)。女性的信度为 0.76 至 0.87,配偶的信度为 0.70 至 0.83:这一新的测量方法有望应用于临床实践和未来的研究中,以评估夫妻双方尤其是通过沟通来共同应对乳腺癌的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Psychosocial Oncology
Journal of Psychosocial Oncology PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Here is your single source of integrated information on providing the best psychosocial care possible from the knowledge available from many disciplines.The Journal of Psychosocial Oncology is an essential source for up-to-date clinical and research material geared toward health professionals who provide psychosocial services to cancer patients, their families, and their caregivers. The journal—the first interdisciplinary resource of its kind—is in its third decade of examining exploratory and hypothesis testing and presenting program evaluation research on critical areas, including: the stigma of cancer; employment and personal problems facing cancer patients; patient education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信