Vitamin D receptor (VDR) variants are risk factors for ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

IF 1.1 4区 生物学 Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Juan Chen, Chunyan Hu, Guiying Chen, Yi Zhang
{"title":"Vitamin D receptor (VDR) variants are risk factors for ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.","authors":"Juan Chen, Chunyan Hu, Guiying Chen, Yi Zhang","doi":"10.1080/15257770.2024.2302525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The importance of Vitamin D in ovarian cancer (OC) has been well documented, and lower levels have been associated with susceptibility to OC. Vitamin D exerts its effect through the vitamin D receptor (VDR). Common genetic variants in the VDR gene (<i>Fok I</i>, <i>TaqI</i>, <i>BamI</i> and <i>ApaI</i>) have been linked with the susceptibility to the development of OC; however, the reports remain contradictory. To draw a valid conclusion, we performed a meta-analysis of the earlier published reports in the present study. The literature search was performed in PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus databases. All relevant articles were screened, and eligible reports were identified based on prefixed inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data such as author's details, year of publication, ethnicity, genotype and allele prevalence in cases and controls were extracted from the eligible reports. The meta-analysis was performed using Comprehensive Meta-analysis Software (CMA) V3. Eight articles, including data from fourteen independent cohorts, comprised 4276 cases and 6739 healthy controls considered for the analysis. VDR <i>FokI</i> and <i>BamI</i> variants revealed a significant association with an increased risk of OC. Other VDR polymorphisms (<i>TaqI</i> and <i>ApaI</i>) failed to demonstrate such an association with OC. Interestingly, the sensitivity analysis revealed minimal deviation from the parent meta-analysis, supporting the robustness of the present analysis. The trial sequential analysis revealed the inclusion of a sufficient number of studies for <i>FokI</i> polymorphism. It highlighted the requirement for additional case-control studies in VDR (<i>ApaI</i>, <i>BamI</i> and <i>TaqI</i>) to draw a definitive conclusion. <i>FokI</i> and <i>BamI</i> polymorphisms are associated with susceptibility to OC.</p>","PeriodicalId":19343,"journal":{"name":"Nucleosides, Nucleotides & Nucleic Acids","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nucleosides, Nucleotides & Nucleic Acids","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15257770.2024.2302525","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The importance of Vitamin D in ovarian cancer (OC) has been well documented, and lower levels have been associated with susceptibility to OC. Vitamin D exerts its effect through the vitamin D receptor (VDR). Common genetic variants in the VDR gene (Fok I, TaqI, BamI and ApaI) have been linked with the susceptibility to the development of OC; however, the reports remain contradictory. To draw a valid conclusion, we performed a meta-analysis of the earlier published reports in the present study. The literature search was performed in PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus databases. All relevant articles were screened, and eligible reports were identified based on prefixed inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data such as author's details, year of publication, ethnicity, genotype and allele prevalence in cases and controls were extracted from the eligible reports. The meta-analysis was performed using Comprehensive Meta-analysis Software (CMA) V3. Eight articles, including data from fourteen independent cohorts, comprised 4276 cases and 6739 healthy controls considered for the analysis. VDR FokI and BamI variants revealed a significant association with an increased risk of OC. Other VDR polymorphisms (TaqI and ApaI) failed to demonstrate such an association with OC. Interestingly, the sensitivity analysis revealed minimal deviation from the parent meta-analysis, supporting the robustness of the present analysis. The trial sequential analysis revealed the inclusion of a sufficient number of studies for FokI polymorphism. It highlighted the requirement for additional case-control studies in VDR (ApaI, BamI and TaqI) to draw a definitive conclusion. FokI and BamI polymorphisms are associated with susceptibility to OC.

维生素 D 受体 (VDR) 变异是卵巢癌的风险因素:一项荟萃分析和试验序列分析。
维生素 D 对卵巢癌(OC)的重要性已得到充分证实,维生素 D 水平较低与卵巢癌的易感性有关。维生素 D 通过维生素 D 受体 (VDR) 发挥作用。VDR 基因中的常见遗传变异(Fok I、TaqI、BamI 和 ApaI)与卵巢癌的易感性有关,但相关报道仍相互矛盾。为了得出有效的结论,我们在本研究中对早期发表的报告进行了荟萃分析。我们在 PubMed、Google Scholar 和 Scopus 数据库中进行了文献检索。我们筛选了所有相关文章,并根据预设的纳入和排除标准确定了符合条件的报告。从符合条件的报告中提取了作者信息、发表年份、种族、病例和对照组的基因型和等位基因流行率等数据。荟萃分析使用综合荟萃分析软件(CMA)V3进行。八篇文章包括来自 14 个独立队列的数据,其中 4276 例病例和 6739 例健康对照组被纳入分析范围。VDR FokI和BamI变异与OC风险增加有显著关联。其他 VDR 多态性(TaqI 和 ApaI)则未能显示出与 OC 的关联。有趣的是,敏感性分析显示与母荟萃分析的偏差极小,支持了本分析的稳健性。试验序列分析显示,FokI 多态性纳入了足够数量的研究。它强调需要对 VDR(ApaI、BamI 和 TaqI)进行更多的病例对照研究,才能得出明确的结论。FokI 和 BamI 多态性与 OC 易感性有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nucleosides, Nucleotides & Nucleic Acids
Nucleosides, Nucleotides & Nucleic Acids 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
91
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Nucleosides, Nucleotides & Nucleic Acids publishes research articles, short notices, and concise, critical reviews of related topics that focus on the chemistry and biology of nucleosides, nucleotides, and nucleic acids. Complete with experimental details, this all-inclusive journal emphasizes the synthesis, biological activities, new and improved synthetic methods, and significant observations related to new compounds.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信