Socioeconomic Impact on Swallow Therapy Attendance.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Dysphagia Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-18 DOI:10.1007/s00455-023-10656-0
Nicolette Jabbour, Pratima Agarwal, Jessica M Pisegna, Nisha Mathur, Melani Zuckerman, Holly Caten, Lauren F Tracy
{"title":"Socioeconomic Impact on Swallow Therapy Attendance.","authors":"Nicolette Jabbour, Pratima Agarwal, Jessica M Pisegna, Nisha Mathur, Melani Zuckerman, Holly Caten, Lauren F Tracy","doi":"10.1007/s00455-023-10656-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dysphagia negatively impacts quality of life and increases health care costs. Swallow therapy is the primary and effective treatment for dysphagia of various etiologies, and attendance is critical to success. This study seeks to identify barriers to swallow therapy attendance at a tertiary care, safety-net hospital. A total of 309 patients were referred for swallow therapy from January 1, 2018, to April 30, 2019. Patients were divided into those who \"Attended\" at least one swallow therapy appointment and those who \"Did not Attend\" any swallow therapy appointment. Demographics, socioeconomic factors, and diagnosis prompting therapy referral were compared between the two groups. Socioeconomic status (SES) was based on insurance status and income. 177 patients (57%) attended at least one swallow therapy appointment and 132 (43%) did not attend any appointments. Overall, 240 (78%) patients had public insurance and 69 (22%) had private insurance. Analysis of SES status identified 106 (34%) patients as double-low SES, 157 (51%) as low SES, and 43 (14%) as high SES. Referral diagnoses were \"Dysphagia-unspecified type\" (n = 119, 38%), \"Cancer\" (n = 66, 21%), \"Neurologic\" (n = 46, 15%), \"Globus\" (n = 29, 9%), \"Aspiration\" (n = 17, 6%), \"Reflux\" (n = 17, 6%), and \"Throat Pain\" (n = 15, 5%). No patient demographic factors, SES factors, or referral diagnosis correlated significantly with swallow therapy attendance. Overall, swallow therapy attendance was poor. In this group, socioeconomic and demographic factors did not significantly impact swallow therapy attendance. Future research should focus on identifying barriers to swallow care and strategies to improve attendance.</p>","PeriodicalId":11508,"journal":{"name":"Dysphagia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dysphagia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-023-10656-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dysphagia negatively impacts quality of life and increases health care costs. Swallow therapy is the primary and effective treatment for dysphagia of various etiologies, and attendance is critical to success. This study seeks to identify barriers to swallow therapy attendance at a tertiary care, safety-net hospital. A total of 309 patients were referred for swallow therapy from January 1, 2018, to April 30, 2019. Patients were divided into those who "Attended" at least one swallow therapy appointment and those who "Did not Attend" any swallow therapy appointment. Demographics, socioeconomic factors, and diagnosis prompting therapy referral were compared between the two groups. Socioeconomic status (SES) was based on insurance status and income. 177 patients (57%) attended at least one swallow therapy appointment and 132 (43%) did not attend any appointments. Overall, 240 (78%) patients had public insurance and 69 (22%) had private insurance. Analysis of SES status identified 106 (34%) patients as double-low SES, 157 (51%) as low SES, and 43 (14%) as high SES. Referral diagnoses were "Dysphagia-unspecified type" (n = 119, 38%), "Cancer" (n = 66, 21%), "Neurologic" (n = 46, 15%), "Globus" (n = 29, 9%), "Aspiration" (n = 17, 6%), "Reflux" (n = 17, 6%), and "Throat Pain" (n = 15, 5%). No patient demographic factors, SES factors, or referral diagnosis correlated significantly with swallow therapy attendance. Overall, swallow therapy attendance was poor. In this group, socioeconomic and demographic factors did not significantly impact swallow therapy attendance. Future research should focus on identifying barriers to swallow care and strategies to improve attendance.

社会经济因素对接受吞咽治疗的影响
吞咽困难会对生活质量造成负面影响,并增加医疗费用。吞咽治疗是针对各种病因引起的吞咽困难的主要有效治疗方法,而参加治疗是成功的关键。本研究旨在确定在一家三级医疗安全网医院接受吞咽治疗的障碍。从 2018 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 4 月 30 日,共有 309 名患者转诊接受吞咽治疗。患者被分为至少 "参加 "一次吞咽治疗预约的患者和 "未参加 "任何吞咽治疗预约的患者。两组患者的人口统计学、社会经济因素和促使治疗转诊的诊断进行了比较。社会经济地位(SES)基于保险状况和收入。177名患者(57%)至少参加了一次吞咽治疗预约,132名患者(43%)没有参加任何预约。总体而言,240 名患者(78%)购买了公共保险,69 名患者(22%)购买了私人保险。社会经济地位分析显示,106 名(34%)患者属于双重低社会经济地位,157 名(51%)属于低社会经济地位,43 名(14%)属于高社会经济地位。转诊诊断为 "吞咽困难-未指定类型"(119 人,占 38%)、"癌症"(66 人,占 21%)、"神经系统"(46 人,占 15%)、"球部"(29 人,占 9%)、"吸入"(17 人,占 6%)、"反流"(17 人,占 6%)和 "咽喉痛"(15 人,占 5%)。患者的人口统计学因素、社会经济地位因素或转诊诊断均与吞咽治疗就诊率无显著相关性。总体而言,吞咽治疗的就诊率较低。在这组患者中,社会经济因素和人口统计因素对吞咽治疗的就诊率没有显著影响。未来的研究应侧重于确定吞咽治疗的障碍和提高就诊率的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dysphagia
Dysphagia 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
15.40%
发文量
149
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Dysphagia aims to serve as a voice for the benefit of the patient. The journal is devoted exclusively to swallowing and its disorders. The purpose of the journal is to provide a source of information to the flourishing dysphagia community. Over the past years, the field of dysphagia has grown rapidly, and the community of dysphagia researchers have galvanized with ambition to represent dysphagia patients. In addition to covering a myriad of disciplines in medicine and speech pathology, the following topics are also covered, but are not limited to: bio-engineering, deglutition, esophageal motility, immunology, and neuro-gastroenterology. The journal aims to foster a growing need for further dysphagia investigation, to disseminate knowledge through research, and to stimulate communication among interested professionals. The journal publishes original papers, technical and instrumental notes, letters to the editor, and review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信