Finding the right combination for self-directed learning: A focus group study of residents' choice and use of digital resources to support their learning

IF 1.4 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Clinical Teacher Pub Date : 2024-01-17 DOI:10.1111/tct.13722
Shreya P. Trivedi, Adam Rodman, Kinga L. Eliasz, Morgan I. Soffler, Amy M. Sullivan
{"title":"Finding the right combination for self-directed learning: A focus group study of residents' choice and use of digital resources to support their learning","authors":"Shreya P. Trivedi,&nbsp;Adam Rodman,&nbsp;Kinga L. Eliasz,&nbsp;Morgan I. Soffler,&nbsp;Amy M. Sullivan","doi":"10.1111/tct.13722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>There has been a shift in postgraduate medical education towards digital educational resources—podcasts, videos, social media and other formats consumed asynchronously and apart from formal curricula. It is unclear what drives residents to select and use these resources. Understanding how and why residents choose digital resources can aid programme directors, faculty and residents in optimising residents' informal learning time.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>This focus group study was conducted with residents at two US internal medicine residency programmes. The authors used the framework approach to content analysis using self-determination theory as guide for deductive coding and iteratively assessing connections among codes and identifying themes. Trustworthiness was addressed through use of analytic memos, reflexive practice and member checking.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The authors conducted eight virtual focus groups (n = 23) from 5/27/20 to 6/11/20. Residents described that a feeling of ‘should know’ drove initial choices towards self-directed learning outside of work. Regular use of a resource was influenced by how the resource fit into a resident's lifestyle, the personal cognitive energy and the perceived ‘activation energy’ of using a particular resource. Familiarity, increased confidence and in-person social networks gained from digital resources served to reinforce and further guide resource choice.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The selection of digital resources for self-directed learning is driven by multiple factors, suggesting an interdependent relationship between the learning environment and a residents' cognitive capacity. Understanding these interconnections can help residents and clinical educators explicitly choose resources that fit their lifestyle and learning needs.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47324,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Teacher","volume":"21 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tct.13722","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

There has been a shift in postgraduate medical education towards digital educational resources—podcasts, videos, social media and other formats consumed asynchronously and apart from formal curricula. It is unclear what drives residents to select and use these resources. Understanding how and why residents choose digital resources can aid programme directors, faculty and residents in optimising residents' informal learning time.

Method

This focus group study was conducted with residents at two US internal medicine residency programmes. The authors used the framework approach to content analysis using self-determination theory as guide for deductive coding and iteratively assessing connections among codes and identifying themes. Trustworthiness was addressed through use of analytic memos, reflexive practice and member checking.

Results

The authors conducted eight virtual focus groups (n = 23) from 5/27/20 to 6/11/20. Residents described that a feeling of ‘should know’ drove initial choices towards self-directed learning outside of work. Regular use of a resource was influenced by how the resource fit into a resident's lifestyle, the personal cognitive energy and the perceived ‘activation energy’ of using a particular resource. Familiarity, increased confidence and in-person social networks gained from digital resources served to reinforce and further guide resource choice.

Conclusions

The selection of digital resources for self-directed learning is driven by multiple factors, suggesting an interdependent relationship between the learning environment and a residents' cognitive capacity. Understanding these interconnections can help residents and clinical educators explicitly choose resources that fit their lifestyle and learning needs.

为自主学习找到合适的组合:居民选择和使用数字资源支持学习的焦点小组研究。
背景:医学研究生教育已转向数字教育资源--播客、视频、社交媒体和其他非同步使用的形式,以及正规课程之外的形式。目前还不清楚是什么促使住院医师选择和使用这些资源。了解住院医师选择数字资源的方式和原因,有助于课程主任、教师和住院医师优化住院医师的非正式学习时间:这项焦点小组研究的对象是美国两个内科住院医师培训项目的住院医师。作者采用框架方法进行内容分析,以自我决定理论为指导进行演绎编码,并反复评估编码之间的联系和确定主题。通过使用分析备忘录、反思性实践和成员核对来解决可信度问题:作者在 5/27/20 至 6/11/20 期间开展了八个虚拟焦点小组(n = 23)。据居民描述,"应该知道 "的感觉促使他们最初选择了工作之外的自主学习。资源如何与居民的生活方式相适应、个人的认知能力以及使用特定资源时感知到的 "激活能量",都会对资源的定期使用产生影响。对数字资源的熟悉程度、自信心的增强以及从数字资源中获得的人际社交网络都有助于加强和进一步指导资源的选择:选择数字资源进行自主学习受到多种因素的影响,这表明学习环境与居民的认知能力之间存在相互依存的关系。了解这些相互关系有助于住院医师和临床教育者明确选择适合其生活方式和学习需求的资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Teacher
Clinical Teacher MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: The Clinical Teacher has been designed with the active, practising clinician in mind. It aims to provide a digest of current research, practice and thinking in medical education presented in a readable, stimulating and practical style. The journal includes sections for reviews of the literature relating to clinical teaching bringing authoritative views on the latest thinking about modern teaching. There are also sections on specific teaching approaches, a digest of the latest research published in Medical Education and other teaching journals, reports of initiatives and advances in thinking and practical teaching from around the world, and expert community and discussion on challenging and controversial issues in today"s clinical education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信