Out of control: computational dynamic control dysfunction in stress- and anxiety-related disorders.

Jonathon R Howlett, Martin P Paulus
{"title":"Out of control: computational dynamic control dysfunction in stress- and anxiety-related disorders.","authors":"Jonathon R Howlett, Martin P Paulus","doi":"10.1007/s44192-023-00058-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Control theory, which has played a central role in technological progress over the last 150 years, has also yielded critical insights into biology and neuroscience. Recently, there has been a surging interest in integrating control theory with computational psychiatry. Here, we review the state of the field of using control theory approaches in computational psychiatry and show that recent research has mapped a neural control circuit consisting of frontal cortex, parietal cortex, and the cerebellum. This basic feedback control circuit is modulated by estimates of reward and cost via the basal ganglia as well as by arousal states coordinated by the insula, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, amygdala, and locus coeruleus. One major approach within the broader field of control theory, known as proportion-integral-derivative (PID) control, has shown promise as a model of human behavior which enables precise and reliable estimates of underlying control parameters at the individual level. These control parameters correlate with self-reported fear and with both structural and functional variation in affect-related brain regions. This suggests that dysfunctional engagement of stress and arousal systems may suboptimally modulate parameters of domain-general goal-directed control algorithms, impairing performance in complex tasks involving movement, cognition, and affect. Future directions include clarifying the causal role of control deficits in stress- and anxiety-related disorders and developing clinically useful tools based on insights from control theory.</p>","PeriodicalId":72827,"journal":{"name":"Discover mental health","volume":"4 1","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10796870/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discover mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44192-023-00058-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Control theory, which has played a central role in technological progress over the last 150 years, has also yielded critical insights into biology and neuroscience. Recently, there has been a surging interest in integrating control theory with computational psychiatry. Here, we review the state of the field of using control theory approaches in computational psychiatry and show that recent research has mapped a neural control circuit consisting of frontal cortex, parietal cortex, and the cerebellum. This basic feedback control circuit is modulated by estimates of reward and cost via the basal ganglia as well as by arousal states coordinated by the insula, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, amygdala, and locus coeruleus. One major approach within the broader field of control theory, known as proportion-integral-derivative (PID) control, has shown promise as a model of human behavior which enables precise and reliable estimates of underlying control parameters at the individual level. These control parameters correlate with self-reported fear and with both structural and functional variation in affect-related brain regions. This suggests that dysfunctional engagement of stress and arousal systems may suboptimally modulate parameters of domain-general goal-directed control algorithms, impairing performance in complex tasks involving movement, cognition, and affect. Future directions include clarifying the causal role of control deficits in stress- and anxiety-related disorders and developing clinically useful tools based on insights from control theory.

失控:压力和焦虑相关疾病中的计算动态控制功能障碍。
控制论在过去 150 年的技术进步中发挥了核心作用,同时也为生物学和神经科学提供了重要见解。最近,人们对将控制论与计算精神病学相结合产生了浓厚的兴趣。在此,我们回顾了在计算精神病学中使用控制论方法的领域现状,并展示了近期研究绘制的由额叶皮层、顶叶皮层和小脑组成的神经控制回路。这个基本的反馈控制回路通过基底神经节以及由岛叶、背侧前扣带回皮层、杏仁核和小脑位置协调的唤醒状态来调节对奖赏和成本的估计。在更广泛的控制理论领域中,一种被称为比例-积分-派生(PID)控制的主要方法已经显示出作为人类行为模型的前景,它可以在个体水平上对基本控制参数进行精确而可靠的估计。这些控制参数与自我报告的恐惧以及情绪相关脑区的结构和功能变化相关。这表明,压力和唤醒系统的功能失调可能会对领域通用目标导向控制算法的参数进行次优调节,从而影响涉及运动、认知和情感的复杂任务的表现。未来的研究方向包括阐明控制缺陷在压力和焦虑相关疾病中的因果作用,以及根据控制理论的见解开发对临床有用的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信