An update on psychogenic nonepileptic seizures.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Current Opinion in Neurology Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-18 DOI:10.1097/WCO.0000000000001245
Mithila Vijay, Markus Reuber
{"title":"An update on psychogenic nonepileptic seizures.","authors":"Mithila Vijay, Markus Reuber","doi":"10.1097/WCO.0000000000001245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The understanding of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) has advanced steadily over recent decades. This update summarizes new insights from the last three years.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The process of diagnosing PNES has shifted from the exclusion of epilepsy to one based on the recognition of typical clinical features. While the diagnosis cannot rely on any single feature in isolation, a range of semiological features characterising PNES are now recognised and a number of studies hint at the potential for machine learning and AI to improve the diagnostic process. Advances in data processing and analysis may also help to make sense of the heterogeneity of PNES populations demonstrated by recent studies focussing on aetiology and patient subgroups. It is now clear that PNES are associated with high rates of mental and physical comorbidities and premature death, highlighting that they are only one manifestation of a complex disorder extending beyond the nervous system and the seizures themselves.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>PNES are now understood as a manifestation of dysfunction in interacting brain networks. This understanding provides an explanation for the psychopathological and semiological heterogeneity of PNES patient populations. New insights into medical comorbidities and increased rates of premature death call for more research into associated pathological processes outside the nervous system.</p>","PeriodicalId":11059,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0000000000001245","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: The understanding of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) has advanced steadily over recent decades. This update summarizes new insights from the last three years.

Recent findings: The process of diagnosing PNES has shifted from the exclusion of epilepsy to one based on the recognition of typical clinical features. While the diagnosis cannot rely on any single feature in isolation, a range of semiological features characterising PNES are now recognised and a number of studies hint at the potential for machine learning and AI to improve the diagnostic process. Advances in data processing and analysis may also help to make sense of the heterogeneity of PNES populations demonstrated by recent studies focussing on aetiology and patient subgroups. It is now clear that PNES are associated with high rates of mental and physical comorbidities and premature death, highlighting that they are only one manifestation of a complex disorder extending beyond the nervous system and the seizures themselves.

Summary: PNES are now understood as a manifestation of dysfunction in interacting brain networks. This understanding provides an explanation for the psychopathological and semiological heterogeneity of PNES patient populations. New insights into medical comorbidities and increased rates of premature death call for more research into associated pathological processes outside the nervous system.

精神性非癫痫发作的最新进展。
回顾的目的:近几十年来,人们对精神性非癫痫性发作(PNES)的认识不断加深。本次更新总结了过去三年中的新发现:诊断 PNES 的过程已从排除癫痫转变为基于典型临床特征的识别。虽然诊断不能孤立地依赖于任何单一特征,但现在人们已经认识到了一系列表征 PNES 的符号学特征,而且一些研究也暗示了机器学习和人工智能在改善诊断过程方面的潜力。数据处理和分析方面的进步也有助于理解PNES人群的异质性,最近的研究重点关注病因学和患者亚群。现在很清楚的一点是,PNES 与精神和躯体并发症的高发率以及过早死亡有关,这突出表明 PNES 只是神经系统和癫痫发作本身之外的复杂疾病的一种表现形式。这种理解为 PNES 患者群体的精神病理学和符号学异质性提供了解释。对并发症和过早死亡率增加的新认识要求对神经系统以外的相关病理过程进行更多研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Neurology
Current Opinion in Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​Current Opinion in Neurology is a highly regarded journal offering insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews; covering key subjects such as cerebrovascular disease, developmental disorders, neuroimaging and demyelinating diseases. Published bimonthly, each issue of Current Opinion in Neurology introduces world renowned guest editors and internationally recognized academics within the neurology field, delivering a widespread selection of expert assessments on the latest developments from the most recent literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信