Blockchain technology and privacy regulation: Reviewing frictions and synthesizing opportunities

IF 20.1 1区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Oluwafemi Akanfe , Diane Lawong , H. Raghav Rao
{"title":"Blockchain technology and privacy regulation: Reviewing frictions and synthesizing opportunities","authors":"Oluwafemi Akanfe ,&nbsp;Diane Lawong ,&nbsp;H. Raghav Rao","doi":"10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.102753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As the application of Blockchain Technology (BCT) grows across several industries<span>, its inherent decentralized and immutable nature raises some conflicting issues concerning privacy regulation. The enforcement of privacy regulations like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) exemplifies these challenges, as certain stringent privacy requirements within GDPR may conflict with BCT's features. However, little attention is given to such critical issues. This study draws on the Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) theoretical lens as a mechanism to unfold the issue. The current research focuses on exploring the tensions and the opportunities for synergy through the lens of TOE to prevent privacy regulatory compliance failure. We analyzed 71 multidisciplinary research studies that highlight the areas of friction and present a unifying structure for research synthesis. In response to the identified areas of friction and potential opportunities for coexistence, we formulate nine research propositions centered around six prominent and contentious data privacy and protection requirements within the GDPR. This research contributes to the broader discourse on privacy regulatory-compliant blockchain-based solutions by providing a theoretical foundation for future investigation into this critical area. The study suggests that reconciling BCT and privacy regulation requirements will unlock BCT's full potential, creating a secure, privacy-conscious technology infrastructure and offering practical implications and insights for policymakers.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":48422,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Information Management","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 102753"},"PeriodicalIF":20.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Information Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026840122400001X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the application of Blockchain Technology (BCT) grows across several industries, its inherent decentralized and immutable nature raises some conflicting issues concerning privacy regulation. The enforcement of privacy regulations like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) exemplifies these challenges, as certain stringent privacy requirements within GDPR may conflict with BCT's features. However, little attention is given to such critical issues. This study draws on the Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) theoretical lens as a mechanism to unfold the issue. The current research focuses on exploring the tensions and the opportunities for synergy through the lens of TOE to prevent privacy regulatory compliance failure. We analyzed 71 multidisciplinary research studies that highlight the areas of friction and present a unifying structure for research synthesis. In response to the identified areas of friction and potential opportunities for coexistence, we formulate nine research propositions centered around six prominent and contentious data privacy and protection requirements within the GDPR. This research contributes to the broader discourse on privacy regulatory-compliant blockchain-based solutions by providing a theoretical foundation for future investigation into this critical area. The study suggests that reconciling BCT and privacy regulation requirements will unlock BCT's full potential, creating a secure, privacy-conscious technology infrastructure and offering practical implications and insights for policymakers.

区块链技术与隐私监管:审视摩擦,总结机遇
随着区块链技术(BCT)在多个行业的应用日益广泛,其固有的去中心化和不可变性引发了一些与隐私监管相关的冲突问题。通用数据保护条例》(GDPR)等隐私法规的实施就体现了这些挑战,因为 GDPR 中某些严格的隐私要求可能与 BCT 的特性相冲突。然而,人们很少关注这些关键问题。本研究从技术-组织-环境(TOE)的理论视角出发,将其作为展开这一问题的机制。当前研究的重点是通过 TOE 的视角探索协同作用的紧张关系和机会,以防止隐私法规遵从失败。我们分析了 71 项多学科研究,这些研究突出了摩擦领域,并为研究综述提供了一个统一的结构。针对已确定的摩擦领域和潜在的共存机会,我们围绕 GDPR 中六项突出且有争议的数据隐私和保护要求提出了九项研究主张。这项研究为这一关键领域的未来研究提供了理论基础,有助于更广泛地讨论符合隐私监管要求的基于区块链的解决方案。研究表明,协调区块链技术和隐私法规要求将释放区块链技术的全部潜力,创建一个安全、具有隐私意识的技术基础设施,并为政策制定者提供实际影响和见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Information Management
International Journal of Information Management INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
53.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
111
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Information Management (IJIM) is a distinguished, international, and peer-reviewed journal dedicated to providing its readers with top-notch analysis and discussions within the evolving field of information management. Key features of the journal include: Comprehensive Coverage: IJIM keeps readers informed with major papers, reports, and reviews. Topical Relevance: The journal remains current and relevant through Viewpoint articles and regular features like Research Notes, Case Studies, and a Reviews section, ensuring readers are updated on contemporary issues. Focus on Quality: IJIM prioritizes high-quality papers that address contemporary issues in information management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信