Different factors identified by stakeholder group for barriers and facilitators to measurement-based care implementation in behavioral health clinics

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Amy M. Yule, Soo Jeong Youn, Kimberlye Dean, Diana W. Woodward, Elizabeth S. Firmin, Joanna Kramer, Mira Stone, Luana Marques, Timothy E. Wilens
{"title":"Different factors identified by stakeholder group for barriers and facilitators to measurement-based care implementation in behavioral health clinics","authors":"Amy M. Yule,&nbsp;Soo Jeong Youn,&nbsp;Kimberlye Dean,&nbsp;Diana W. Woodward,&nbsp;Elizabeth S. Firmin,&nbsp;Joanna Kramer,&nbsp;Mira Stone,&nbsp;Luana Marques,&nbsp;Timothy E. Wilens","doi":"10.1002/jclp.23639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Despite the benefits of measurement-based care (MBC) in the behavioral health setting, there have been difficulties in implementation and low saturation. Although barriers and facilitators to MBC implementation have been identified, research has generally only included the perspective of one stakeholder group. The current study aims to examine the similarities and differences—by stakeholder group—in the identified barriers to and facilitators of implementing MBC in the behavioral health setting.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>A purposeful sampling approach was used to recruit and conduct interviews and focus groups with stakeholders (clinicians, clinic leaders, and administrative staff) from four behavioral health clinics at an academic medical center that is part of a larger healthcare system. The data coding process included a directed content analytic approach whereby the coding team used an iterative process to analyze deidentified transcripts starting with a codebook based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) constructs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 31 clinicians, 11 clinic leaders, and 8 administrative staff participated in the interviews and focus groups. There was convergence among all stakeholder regarding which CFIR constructs were identified as barriers and facilitators, but there were differences in the specific thematic factors identified by stakeholders as barriers and facilitators within each of these implementation constructs. The barriers and facilitators that stakeholders identified within each CFIR construct were often connected to their specific role in implementing MBC.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Collecting information on barriers and facilitators to MBC implementation from the multiple stakeholders involved in the process may enhance successful implementation of MBC given the variation between groups in identified thematic factors. Administrative staff perspectives, which have not been reported in the literature, may be of particular importance in planning for successful MBC implementation.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jclp.23639","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Despite the benefits of measurement-based care (MBC) in the behavioral health setting, there have been difficulties in implementation and low saturation. Although barriers and facilitators to MBC implementation have been identified, research has generally only included the perspective of one stakeholder group. The current study aims to examine the similarities and differences—by stakeholder group—in the identified barriers to and facilitators of implementing MBC in the behavioral health setting.

Method

A purposeful sampling approach was used to recruit and conduct interviews and focus groups with stakeholders (clinicians, clinic leaders, and administrative staff) from four behavioral health clinics at an academic medical center that is part of a larger healthcare system. The data coding process included a directed content analytic approach whereby the coding team used an iterative process to analyze deidentified transcripts starting with a codebook based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) constructs.

Results

A total of 31 clinicians, 11 clinic leaders, and 8 administrative staff participated in the interviews and focus groups. There was convergence among all stakeholder regarding which CFIR constructs were identified as barriers and facilitators, but there were differences in the specific thematic factors identified by stakeholders as barriers and facilitators within each of these implementation constructs. The barriers and facilitators that stakeholders identified within each CFIR construct were often connected to their specific role in implementing MBC.

Conclusion

Collecting information on barriers and facilitators to MBC implementation from the multiple stakeholders involved in the process may enhance successful implementation of MBC given the variation between groups in identified thematic factors. Administrative staff perspectives, which have not been reported in the literature, may be of particular importance in planning for successful MBC implementation.

利益相关者小组确定的行为健康诊所实施基于测量的护理的障碍和促进因素。
导言:尽管基于测量的护理(MBC)在行为健康领域有诸多益处,但在实施过程中却困难重重,饱和度较低。虽然已经确定了实施 MBC 的障碍和促进因素,但研究通常只包括一个利益相关群体的观点。本研究旨在探讨各利益相关群体在行为健康环境中实施 MBC 的障碍和促进因素的异同:方法:采用有目的的抽样方法,对一家学术医疗中心的四家行为健康诊所的利益相关者(临床医生、诊所领导和行政人员)进行招募,并与他们进行访谈和焦点小组讨论,该学术医疗中心是大型医疗保健系统的一部分。数据编码过程包括定向内容分析法,即编码小组使用迭代过程分析去身份化的记录誊本,从基于实施研究综合框架(CFIR)构建的编码手册开始:共有 31 名临床医生、11 名诊所领导和 8 名行政人员参加了访谈和焦点小组。所有利益相关者在哪些 CFIR 构架被认定为障碍和促进因素方面意见一致,但在每个实施构架中,利益相关者认定为障碍和促进因素的具体主题因素存在差异。利益相关者在每个 CFIR 构架中确定的障碍和促进因素往往与他们在实施流式细胞生 殖技术中的具体角色有关:结论:从参与这一过程的多个利益相关者那里收集有关实施乳糜泻的障碍和促进因素的信 息,可能会促进乳糜泻的成功实施,因为不同群体在确定的主题因素方面存在差异。行政人员的观点在文献中未见报道,可能对计划成功实施乳糜泻尤为重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信