Polypharmacy, Potentially Inappropriate Medications, and Dysphagia in Older Inpatients: A Multi-Center Cohort Study.

IF 2.8 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-17 DOI:10.4235/agmr.23.0203
Shintaro Togashi, Hironori Ohinata, Taiji Noguchi, Hidetaka Wakabayashi, Mariko Nakamichi, Akio Shimizu, Shinta Nishioka, Ryo Momosaki
{"title":"Polypharmacy, Potentially Inappropriate Medications, and Dysphagia in Older Inpatients: A Multi-Center Cohort Study.","authors":"Shintaro Togashi, Hironori Ohinata, Taiji Noguchi, Hidetaka Wakabayashi, Mariko Nakamichi, Akio Shimizu, Shinta Nishioka, Ryo Momosaki","doi":"10.4235/agmr.23.0203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although the relationship between medication status, symptomatology, and outcomes has been evaluated, data on the prevalence of polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and the association of polypharmacy and PIMs with swallowing function during follow-up are limited among hospitalized patients aged ≥65 years with dysphagia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this 19-center cohort study, we registered 467 inpatients aged ≥65 years and evaluated those with the Food Intake LEVEL Scale (FILS) scores ≤8 between November 2019 and March 2021. Polypharmacy was defined as prescribing ≥5 medications and PIMs were identified based on the 2023 Updated Beers Criteria. We applied a generalized linear regression model to examine the association of polypharmacy and PIMs with FILS score at discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 399 participants (median age, 83.0 years; males, 49.8%). The median follow-up was 51.0 days (interquartile range, 22.0-84.0 days). Polypharmacy and PIMs were present in 67.7% of and 56.1% of patients, respectively. After adjusting for covariates, neither polypharmacy (β = 0.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.04-0.13, p=0.30) nor non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications (β = 0.09; 95% CI, -0.02-0.19; p=0.10) were significantly associated with FILS score at discharge.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study indicated a high proportion of polypharmacy and PIMs among inpatients aged ≥65 years with dysphagia. Although these prescribed conditions were not significantly associated with swallowing function at discharge, our findings suggest the importance of regularly reviewing medications to ensure the appropriateness of prescriptions when managing older inpatients.</p>","PeriodicalId":44729,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research","volume":" ","pages":"86-94"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10982443/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4235/agmr.23.0203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although the relationship between medication status, symptomatology, and outcomes has been evaluated, data on the prevalence of polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and the association of polypharmacy and PIMs with swallowing function during follow-up are limited among hospitalized patients aged ≥65 years with dysphagia.

Methods: In this 19-center cohort study, we registered 467 inpatients aged ≥65 years and evaluated those with the Food Intake LEVEL Scale (FILS) scores ≤8 between November 2019 and March 2021. Polypharmacy was defined as prescribing ≥5 medications and PIMs were identified based on the 2023 Updated Beers Criteria. We applied a generalized linear regression model to examine the association of polypharmacy and PIMs with FILS score at discharge.

Results: We analyzed 399 participants (median age, 83.0 years; males, 49.8%). The median follow-up was 51.0 days (interquartile range, 22.0-84.0 days). Polypharmacy and PIMs were present in 67.7% of and 56.1% of patients, respectively. After adjusting for covariates, neither polypharmacy (β = 0.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.04-0.13, p=0.30) nor non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications (β = 0.09; 95% CI, -0.02-0.19; p=0.10) were significantly associated with FILS score at discharge.

Conclusion: The results of this study indicated a high proportion of polypharmacy and PIMs among inpatients aged ≥65 years with dysphagia. Although these prescribed conditions were not significantly associated with swallowing function at discharge, our findings suggest the importance of regularly reviewing medications to ensure the appropriateness of prescriptions when managing older inpatients.

老年住院患者的多重用药、潜在用药不当和吞咽困难;一项多中心队列研究。
背景:虽然已经对用药状况、症状和结果之间的关系进行了评估,但在年龄≥65岁的吞咽困难住院患者中,有关多药治疗和潜在不适当药物(PIMs)的患病率以及随访期间多药治疗和PIMs与吞咽功能之间关系的数据十分有限:在这项 19 个中心的队列研究中,我们登记了 467 名年龄≥65 岁的住院患者,并在 2019 年 11 月至 2021 年 3 月期间对食物摄入量 LEVEL 量表(FILS)评分≤8 分的患者进行了评估。多重用药定义为处方药物≥5 种,PIMs 根据 2023 年更新的 Beers 标准® 确定。我们采用广义线性回归模型来研究多药滥用和 PIMs 与出院时 FILS 评分的关系:我们分析了 399 名参与者(中位年龄 83.0 岁;男性占 49.8%)。随访中位数为 51.0 天,四分位数范围为 22.0-84.0 天]。分别有 67.7% 和 56.1% 的患者存在多重用药和 PIMs。调整协变量后,多药(β = 0.05 [95% 置信区间 (CI),-0.04-0.13],p = 0.30)或非类固醇抗炎药(β = 0.09 [95%CI, -0.02-0.19],p = 0.10)与出院时的 FILS 评分均无显著相关性:研究结果表明,在年龄≥65 岁的吞咽困难住院患者中,使用多种药物和 PIMs 的比例很高。虽然这些处方条件与出院时的吞咽功能没有明显关联,但我们的研究结果表明,在管理老年住院患者时,定期检查药物以确保处方适当性非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research
Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
35
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信