Primary prevention of prescription stimulant misuse in first-year college students.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Journal of American College Health Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-16 DOI:10.1080/07448481.2023.2299409
Kevin M Antshel, Aesoon Park, Stephen Maisto, Stephen V Faraone
{"title":"Primary prevention of prescription stimulant misuse in first-year college students.","authors":"Kevin M Antshel, Aesoon Park, Stephen Maisto, Stephen V Faraone","doi":"10.1080/07448481.2023.2299409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Eight percent of college students report past year prescription stimulant misuse (nonmedical use of stimulants defined as taking stimulants in a manner other than prescribed). Despite this high prevalence rate, primary prevention efforts are lacking on college campuses. <b>Participants and Methods:</b> A prescription stimulant misuse primary prevention intervention targeting first-year college students was developed, refined, and pilot tested. Existing substance use treatment (motivational interviewing) and time management (cognitive behavioral therapy for adult ADHD) techniques were integrated into the novel brief prevention intervention. Focus groups provided feedback to help refine the prevention intervention. Following refinements, 484 first-year college students were randomly assigned to condition (327 treatment, 157 control) and followed for 3 months. <b>Results:</b> Participants rated the intervention as satisfactory. After controlling for time invariant covariates, condition significantly predicted prescription stimulant misuse. There was a lower rate of past 3-month prescription stimulant misuse reported in the intervention group (4.9%) compared to the control group (11.5%). Academic expectancies remained stable in the intervention group yet increased in the control condition over time. Time management skill ratings remained stable in both groups. Changes in academic expectancies, yet not time management skills, were a partial mediator of the prevention efficacy in prescription stimulant misuse at 3-month follow-up. <b>Conclusions:</b> These results provide preliminary support for the acceptability and efficacy of a brief primary prevention intervention for college student prescription stimulant misuse. Changes in positive prescription stimulant expectancies, yet not time management skills, appear to be potential targets for future preventive efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":14900,"journal":{"name":"Journal of American College Health","volume":" ","pages":"2417-2425"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of American College Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2023.2299409","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Eight percent of college students report past year prescription stimulant misuse (nonmedical use of stimulants defined as taking stimulants in a manner other than prescribed). Despite this high prevalence rate, primary prevention efforts are lacking on college campuses. Participants and Methods: A prescription stimulant misuse primary prevention intervention targeting first-year college students was developed, refined, and pilot tested. Existing substance use treatment (motivational interviewing) and time management (cognitive behavioral therapy for adult ADHD) techniques were integrated into the novel brief prevention intervention. Focus groups provided feedback to help refine the prevention intervention. Following refinements, 484 first-year college students were randomly assigned to condition (327 treatment, 157 control) and followed for 3 months. Results: Participants rated the intervention as satisfactory. After controlling for time invariant covariates, condition significantly predicted prescription stimulant misuse. There was a lower rate of past 3-month prescription stimulant misuse reported in the intervention group (4.9%) compared to the control group (11.5%). Academic expectancies remained stable in the intervention group yet increased in the control condition over time. Time management skill ratings remained stable in both groups. Changes in academic expectancies, yet not time management skills, were a partial mediator of the prevention efficacy in prescription stimulant misuse at 3-month follow-up. Conclusions: These results provide preliminary support for the acceptability and efficacy of a brief primary prevention intervention for college student prescription stimulant misuse. Changes in positive prescription stimulant expectancies, yet not time management skills, appear to be potential targets for future preventive efforts.

大学一年级学生滥用处方兴奋剂的初级预防。
目标:8%的大学生报告过去一年滥用处方兴奋剂(非医疗使用兴奋剂的定义是以处方以外的方式服用兴奋剂)。尽管滥用率如此之高,但大学校园却缺乏初级预防措施。参与者和方法:针对大学一年级学生开发、完善并试点测试了处方兴奋剂滥用初级预防干预措施。现有的药物使用治疗(动机访谈)和时间管理(针对成人多动症的认知行为疗法)技术被整合到了新颖的简短预防干预中。焦点小组提供反馈意见,帮助完善预防干预措施。经过改进后,484 名大学一年级学生被随机分配到不同的条件下(327 人接受治疗,157 人接受控制),并接受为期 3 个月的跟踪调查。结果:参与者对干预措施的评价令人满意。在控制了时间不变的协变量后,条件显著预测了处方兴奋剂的滥用。与对照组(11.5%)相比,干预组过去 3 个月滥用处方兴奋剂的比例较低(4.9%)。随着时间的推移,干预组的学业期望值保持稳定,而对照组则有所上升。两组的时间管理技能评分均保持稳定。在3个月的随访中,学业期望值的变化(而非时间管理技能)是处方兴奋剂滥用预防效果的部分中介因素。结论这些结果初步证明了针对大学生处方兴奋剂滥用的简短初级预防干预的可接受性和有效性。处方兴奋剂积极预期的改变,而非时间管理技能的改变,似乎是未来预防工作的潜在目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
388
期刊介绍: Binge drinking, campus violence, eating disorders, sexual harassment: Today"s college students face challenges their parents never imagined. The Journal of American College Health, the only scholarly publication devoted entirely to college students" health, focuses on these issues, as well as use of tobacco and other drugs, sexual habits, psychological problems, and guns on campus, as well as the students... Published in cooperation with the American College Health Association, the Journal of American College Health is a must read for physicians, nurses, health educators, and administrators who are involved with students every day.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信