Response

IF 0.8 2区文学 0 LITERATURE

New Literary History Pub Date : 2024-01-16 DOI:10.1353/nlh.2023.a917060

Peter Burke

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:

The aim of this response is to comment not so much on individual contributions, from all of which I have learned much, or indeed on individual examples of polymaths but rather on the practice of polymathy: on what the examples chosen by the authors of these essays tell us about the structures underlying, enabling, or blocking this practice and the ways in which it has changed over the centuries. It will reflect on the deceptively simple questions of What? Who? How? Where? When? With What Effects?

查看原文本刊更多论文

回应

摘要：这篇回应的目的不是评论个别文章（我从所有这些文章中学到了很多东西），也不是评论多面手的个别例子，而是评论多面手的实践：这些文章的作者所选择的例子告诉我们这种实践的基础、促成或阻碍的结构，以及几百年来这种实践的变化方式。它将思考 "是什么？是谁？谁？在哪里做？何时？有什么影响？

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

New Literary History LITERATURE-

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

11.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： New Literary History focuses on questions of theory, method, interpretation, and literary history. Rather than espousing a single ideology or intellectual framework, it canvasses a wide range of scholarly concerns. By examining the bases of criticism, the journal provokes debate on the relations between literary and cultural texts and present needs. A major international forum for scholarly exchange, New Literary History has received six awards from the Council of Editors of Learned Journals.