Empirical evaluation of the strength and deformation characteristics of natural and synthetic gas hydrate-bearing sediments with different ranges of porosity, hydrate saturation, effective stress, and strain rate

IF 3.5 3区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Jun Yoneda, Kiyofumi Suzuki, Motoi Oshima, Michihiro Muraoka, Yusuke Jin
{"title":"Empirical evaluation of the strength and deformation characteristics of natural and synthetic gas hydrate-bearing sediments with different ranges of porosity, hydrate saturation, effective stress, and strain rate","authors":"Jun Yoneda, Kiyofumi Suzuki, Motoi Oshima, Michihiro Muraoka, Yusuke Jin","doi":"10.1186/s40645-024-00606-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Evaluating the mechanical properties of gas (primarily methane) hydrate-bearing sediments is essential for commercial production as a next-generation resource and understanding the global carbon cycle. Triaxial and uniaxial compression tests have been conducted on synthetic gas hydrate and natural core samples recovered from deep-sea beds using pressure coring techniques. The results show that four factors are vital in establishing the strength of hydrate-bearing sediments: hydrate saturation, effective confining stress, porosity, and strain rate. However, no study has evaluated these factors in a unified and quantitative manner, and even if the physical properties of the reservoir are known in detail from logging, predicting the strength has been challenging. In this study, pressure cores were drilled and recovered from the Eastern Nankai Trough in April 2018 after Japan’s second offshore production test, and triaxial or uniaxial compression tests were performed on 12 pressure core samples brought back to the laboratory. The mechanical properties of the hydrate-bearing sediments were classified with previous obtained results from 53 pressure cores and 223 synthetic cores, and empirical equations for triaxial compressive strength and deformation modulus were proposed as functions of gas hydrate saturation, effective confining pressure, porosity, and strain rate. The obtained equations were found to correlate well with the experimental data and can predict the strength and deformation modulus from logging data.</p>\n","PeriodicalId":54272,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Earth and Planetary Science","volume":"80 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Earth and Planetary Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-024-00606-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evaluating the mechanical properties of gas (primarily methane) hydrate-bearing sediments is essential for commercial production as a next-generation resource and understanding the global carbon cycle. Triaxial and uniaxial compression tests have been conducted on synthetic gas hydrate and natural core samples recovered from deep-sea beds using pressure coring techniques. The results show that four factors are vital in establishing the strength of hydrate-bearing sediments: hydrate saturation, effective confining stress, porosity, and strain rate. However, no study has evaluated these factors in a unified and quantitative manner, and even if the physical properties of the reservoir are known in detail from logging, predicting the strength has been challenging. In this study, pressure cores were drilled and recovered from the Eastern Nankai Trough in April 2018 after Japan’s second offshore production test, and triaxial or uniaxial compression tests were performed on 12 pressure core samples brought back to the laboratory. The mechanical properties of the hydrate-bearing sediments were classified with previous obtained results from 53 pressure cores and 223 synthetic cores, and empirical equations for triaxial compressive strength and deformation modulus were proposed as functions of gas hydrate saturation, effective confining pressure, porosity, and strain rate. The obtained equations were found to correlate well with the experimental data and can predict the strength and deformation modulus from logging data.

Abstract Image

对不同孔隙度、水合物饱和度、有效应力和应变率范围的天然和合成含天然气水合物沉积物的强度和变形特性进行经验评估
评估含天然气(主要是甲烷)水合物沉积物的机械特性对于作为下一代资源的商业生产和了解全球碳循环至关重要。使用压力取芯技术对合成天然气水合物和从深海海床采集的天然岩芯样本进行了三轴和单轴压缩试验。结果表明,四个因素对确定含水合物沉积物的强度至关重要:水合物饱和度、有效约束应力、孔隙度和应变率。然而,还没有研究以统一和定量的方式对这些因素进行评估,即使通过测井详细了解了储层的物理特性,预测强度也一直是个难题。在这项研究中,2018 年 4 月日本第二次海上生产试验后,在东南海海槽钻取并回收了压力岩心,并对带回实验室的 12 个压力岩心样本进行了三轴或单轴压缩试验。根据之前从 53 个压力岩心和 223 个合成岩心获得的结果,对含水合物沉积物的力学性质进行了分类,并提出了三轴压缩强度和变形模量的经验方程,作为天然气水合物饱和度、有效约束压力、孔隙度和应变速率的函数。结果表明,所得方程与实验数据相关性良好,可以根据测井数据预测强度和变形模量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science Earth and Planetary Sciences-General Earth and Planetary Sciences
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.10%
发文量
59
审稿时长
31 weeks
期刊介绍: Progress in Earth and Planetary Science (PEPS), a peer-reviewed open access e-journal, was launched by the Japan Geoscience Union (JpGU) in 2014. This international journal is devoted to high-quality original articles, reviews and papers with full data attached in the research fields of space and planetary sciences, atmospheric and hydrospheric sciences, human geosciences, solid earth sciences, and biogeosciences. PEPS promotes excellent review articles and welcomes articles with electronic attachments including videos, animations, and large original data files. PEPS also encourages papers with full data attached: papers with full data attached are scientific articles that preserve the full detailed raw research data and metadata which were gathered in their preparation and make these data freely available to the research community for further analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信