What Is the Effect of Maxillary Impaction Orthognathic Surgery on Voice Characteristics? A Quasi-Experimental Study.

IF 0.9 Q3 SURGERY
Hamide Ghaemi, Ricardo Grillo, Omid Alizadeh, Alireza Shirzadeh, Behnoush Ejtehadi, Masoud Torkzadeh, Sahand Samieirad
{"title":"What Is the Effect of Maxillary Impaction Orthognathic Surgery on Voice Characteristics? A Quasi-Experimental Study.","authors":"Hamide Ghaemi, Ricardo Grillo, Omid Alizadeh, Alireza Shirzadeh, Behnoush Ejtehadi, Masoud Torkzadeh, Sahand Samieirad","doi":"10.61186/wjps.12.3.44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Regarding the impact of orthognathic surgery on the airway and voice, this study was carried out to investigate the effects of maxillary impaction surgery on patients' voices through acoustic analysis and articulation assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This quasi-experimental, before-and-after, double-blind study aimed at examining the effects of maxillary impaction surgery on the voice of orthognathic surgery patients. Before the surgery, a speech therapist conducted acoustic analysis, which included fundament frequency (F0), Jitter, Shimmer, and the harmonic-to-noise ratio (HNR), as well as first, second, and third formants (F1, F2, and F3). The patient's age, sex, degree of maxillary deformity, and impaction were documented in a checklist. Voice analysis was repeated during follow-up appointments at one and six months after the surgery in a blinded manner. The data were statistically analyzed using SPSS 23, and the significance level was set at 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty two patients (18 females, 4 males) were examined, with ages ranging from 18 to 40 years and an average age of 25.54 years. F2, F3, HNR, and Shimmer demonstrated a significant increase over the investigation period compared to the initial phase of the study (P <0.001 for each). Conversely, the Jitter variable exhibited a significant decrease during the follow-up assessments in comparison to the initial phase of the study (P< 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Following maxillary impaction surgery, improvements in voice quality were observed compared to the preoperative condition. However, further studies with larger samples are needed to confirm the relevancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":23736,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Plastic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10788109/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61186/wjps.12.3.44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Regarding the impact of orthognathic surgery on the airway and voice, this study was carried out to investigate the effects of maxillary impaction surgery on patients' voices through acoustic analysis and articulation assessment.

Methods: This quasi-experimental, before-and-after, double-blind study aimed at examining the effects of maxillary impaction surgery on the voice of orthognathic surgery patients. Before the surgery, a speech therapist conducted acoustic analysis, which included fundament frequency (F0), Jitter, Shimmer, and the harmonic-to-noise ratio (HNR), as well as first, second, and third formants (F1, F2, and F3). The patient's age, sex, degree of maxillary deformity, and impaction were documented in a checklist. Voice analysis was repeated during follow-up appointments at one and six months after the surgery in a blinded manner. The data were statistically analyzed using SPSS 23, and the significance level was set at 0.05.

Results: Twenty two patients (18 females, 4 males) were examined, with ages ranging from 18 to 40 years and an average age of 25.54 years. F2, F3, HNR, and Shimmer demonstrated a significant increase over the investigation period compared to the initial phase of the study (P <0.001 for each). Conversely, the Jitter variable exhibited a significant decrease during the follow-up assessments in comparison to the initial phase of the study (P< 0.001).

Conclusion: Following maxillary impaction surgery, improvements in voice quality were observed compared to the preoperative condition. However, further studies with larger samples are needed to confirm the relevancy.

上颌咬合正颌手术对嗓音特征有何影响?一项准实验研究
背景:关于正颌外科手术对气道和嗓音的影响,本研究通过声学分析和发音评估,探讨上颌阻塞手术对患者嗓音的影响:本研究是一项准实验性、前后双盲研究,旨在探讨上颌阻塞手术对正颌手术患者嗓音的影响。手术前,语言治疗师进行了声学分析,包括基频(F0)、抖动(Jitter)、微光(Shimmer)、谐噪比(HNR)以及第一、第二和第三构音(F1、F2和F3)。患者的年龄、性别、上颌畸形程度和咬合情况都记录在检查表中。在术后 1 个月和 6 个月的随访中,以盲法重复进行语音分析。数据使用 SPSS 23 进行统计分析,显著性水平设定为 0.05:22名患者(18名女性,4名男性)接受了检查,年龄从18岁到40岁不等,平均年龄为25.54岁。与研究初始阶段相比,F2、F3、HNR 和 Shimmer 在调查期间均有显著增加(P 结论:上颌阻塞手术后,患者的上颌咀嚼功能明显改善:与术前相比,上颌阻塞手术后嗓音质量有所改善。不过,还需要对更多样本进行进一步研究,以确认其相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
11.10%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信