Factors Associated with the Discrepancy between Exercise Capacity and Airflow Limitation in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

IF 2.5 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-16 DOI:10.4046/trd.2023.0068
Tae Hoon Kim, I Re Heo, Na Young Kim, Joo Hun Park, Hee-Young Yoon, Ji Ye Jung, Seung Won Ra, Ki-Suck Jung, Kwang Ha Yoo, Ho Cheol Kim
{"title":"Factors Associated with the Discrepancy between Exercise Capacity and Airflow Limitation in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.","authors":"Tae Hoon Kim, I Re Heo, Na Young Kim, Joo Hun Park, Hee-Young Yoon, Ji Ye Jung, Seung Won Ra, Ki-Suck Jung, Kwang Ha Yoo, Ho Cheol Kim","doi":"10.4046/trd.2023.0068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exercise capacity is associated with lung function decline in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients, but a discrepancy between exercise capacity and airflow limitation exists. This study aimed to explore factors contributing to this discrepancy in COPD patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data for this prospective study were obtained from the Korean COPD Subgroup Study. The exercise capacity and airflow limitation were assessed using the 6-minute walk distance (6-MWD; m) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). Participants were divided into four groups: FEV1 &gt;50%+6-MWD &gt;350, FEV1 &gt;50%+6- MWD ≤350, FEV1 ≤50%+6-MWD &gt;350, and FEV1 ≤50%+6-MWD ≤350 and their clinical characteristics were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 883 patients (male:female, 822:61; mean age, 68.3±7.97 years) were enrolled. Among 591 patients with FEV1 &gt;50%, 242 were in the 6-MWD ≤350 group, and among 292 patients with FEV1 ≤50%, 185 were in the 6-MWD &gt;350 group. The multiple regression analyses revealed that male sex (odds ratio [OR], 8.779; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.539 to 50.087; p=0.014), current smoking status (OR, 0.355; 95% CI, 0.178 to 0.709; p=0.003), and hemoglobin levels (OR, 1.332; 95% CI, 1.077 to 1.648; p=0.008) were significantly associated with discrepancies in exercise capacity and airflow limitation in patients with FEV1 &gt;50%. Meanwhile, in patients with FEV1 ≤50%, diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide (OR, 0.945; 95% CI, 0.912 to 0.979; p=0.002) was significantly associated with discrepancies between exercise capacity and airflow limitation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The exercise capacity of COPD patients may be influenced by factors other than airflow limitation, so these aspects should be considered when assessing and treating patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23368,"journal":{"name":"Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"155-164"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10990613/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.2023.0068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Exercise capacity is associated with lung function decline in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients, but a discrepancy between exercise capacity and airflow limitation exists. This study aimed to explore factors contributing to this discrepancy in COPD patients.

Methods: Data for this prospective study were obtained from the Korean COPD Subgroup Study. The exercise capacity and airflow limitation were assessed using the 6-minute walk distance (6-MWD; m) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). Participants were divided into four groups: FEV1 >50%+6-MWD >350, FEV1 >50%+6- MWD ≤350, FEV1 ≤50%+6-MWD >350, and FEV1 ≤50%+6-MWD ≤350 and their clinical characteristics were compared.

Results: A total of 883 patients (male:female, 822:61; mean age, 68.3±7.97 years) were enrolled. Among 591 patients with FEV1 >50%, 242 were in the 6-MWD ≤350 group, and among 292 patients with FEV1 ≤50%, 185 were in the 6-MWD >350 group. The multiple regression analyses revealed that male sex (odds ratio [OR], 8.779; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.539 to 50.087; p=0.014), current smoking status (OR, 0.355; 95% CI, 0.178 to 0.709; p=0.003), and hemoglobin levels (OR, 1.332; 95% CI, 1.077 to 1.648; p=0.008) were significantly associated with discrepancies in exercise capacity and airflow limitation in patients with FEV1 >50%. Meanwhile, in patients with FEV1 ≤50%, diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide (OR, 0.945; 95% CI, 0.912 to 0.979; p=0.002) was significantly associated with discrepancies between exercise capacity and airflow limitation.

Conclusion: The exercise capacity of COPD patients may be influenced by factors other than airflow limitation, so these aspects should be considered when assessing and treating patients.

慢性阻塞性肺病患者运动能力与气流限制之间差异的相关因素。
背景:运动能力与慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的肺功能下降有关,但运动能力与气流受限之间存在差异。本研究旨在探讨导致患者出现这种差异的因素:这项前瞻性研究的数据来自韩国慢性阻塞性肺病亚组研究。采用 6 分钟步行距离(6-MWD,米)和 1 秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)评估运动能力和气流受限。参与者被分为四组:FEV1 >50% + 6-MWD >350、FEV1 >50% + 6-MWD ≤350、FEV1 ≤50% + 6-MWD >350、FEV1 ≤50% + 6-MWD ≤350,并比较他们的临床特征:共纳入 883 例患者(男:女=822:61,平均年龄=68.3±7.97 岁)。在591例FEV1>50%的患者中,242例属于6-MWD≤350组;在292例FEV1≤50%的患者中,185例属于6-MWD>350组。多元回归分析显示,男性性别(比值比 [OR],8.779;95% 置信区间 [CI],1.539-50.087;P=0.014)、当前吸烟状态(OR,0.355;95% CI,0.178-0.709;P=0.003)和血红蛋白水平(OR,1.332;95% CI,1.077-1.648;P=0.008)与FEV1>50%患者的运动能力和气流受限的差异明显相关;同时,在FEV1≤50%的患者中,一氧化碳的扩散能力(OR,0.945;95% CI,0.912-0.979;P=0.002)与之明显相关:结论:慢性阻塞性肺病患者的运动能力可能受到气流受限以外因素的影响,因此在评估或治疗患者时应考虑到这些方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信