Perspectives on the Use of Digital Health Technologies in Cardiology Among Specialists from an ESC Member Country: Results from a Survey.

Duygu Koçyigit Burunkaya, Nurgül Keser, Evrim Şimşek, Serdar Bozyel, Yalçın Dalgıç, Mehmet Şeker, Yetkin Korkmaz, Arda Güler, Tufan Çınar, Mehmet Ertürk
{"title":"Perspectives on the Use of Digital Health Technologies in Cardiology Among Specialists from an ESC Member Country: Results from a Survey.","authors":"Duygu Koçyigit Burunkaya, Nurgül Keser, Evrim Şimşek, Serdar Bozyel, Yalçın Dalgıç, Mehmet Şeker, Yetkin Korkmaz, Arda Güler, Tufan Çınar, Mehmet Ertürk","doi":"10.5543/tkda.2023.13660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, we aimed to identify the reasons for and perceived challenges associated with the use of digital health technologies (DHT) in cardiology.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We distributed an online survey to Turkish Society of Cardiology member cardiologists (n = 2789) between January 10 and March 3, 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 308 subjects responded (27.6% females, 62.0% aged 30-44 years). Of these, 42.5% worked at university hospitals, and 44.8% at state hospitals. Smart devices were used by 44.2% (136/308) for personal health monitoring. Additionally, 40.3% (117/290) used social media to provide medical information to patients, while 64.6% (193/299) did so for communication with other physicians. The self-reported recommendation frequencies of wearables, cardiac implantable electronic device telemonitorization, mobile health applications, and teleconsultation/televisit technologies were lower than the proportion of respondents who found DHT beneficial for both patients and physicians. The most frequently mentioned barriers for physicians were increased work burden and responsibilities (78.8%, 193/245), lack of financial compensation (66.9%, 164/245), and lack of relevant training (66.5%, 163/245). For patients, low technological adaptability (81.6%, 200/245), low health literacy (80.4%, 197/245), and low affordability (79.6%, 195/245) were the most frequently mentioned barriers. Additionally, the cost of technologies (69.4%, 170/245), concerns regarding data privacy and security (57.6%, 141/245), and data storage challenges (48.2%, 118/245) were the most significant technical impediments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that although the majority of physicians believe DHT to be beneficial for both themselves and their patients, the frequency of recommendations to patients remains low. A large-scale joint effort is required to address these issues and facilitate the integration of DHT into clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":94261,"journal":{"name":"Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi arsivi : Turk Kardiyoloji Derneginin yayin organidir","volume":"52 1","pages":"44-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi arsivi : Turk Kardiyoloji Derneginin yayin organidir","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5543/tkda.2023.13660","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we aimed to identify the reasons for and perceived challenges associated with the use of digital health technologies (DHT) in cardiology.

Method: We distributed an online survey to Turkish Society of Cardiology member cardiologists (n = 2789) between January 10 and March 3, 2022.

Results: A total of 308 subjects responded (27.6% females, 62.0% aged 30-44 years). Of these, 42.5% worked at university hospitals, and 44.8% at state hospitals. Smart devices were used by 44.2% (136/308) for personal health monitoring. Additionally, 40.3% (117/290) used social media to provide medical information to patients, while 64.6% (193/299) did so for communication with other physicians. The self-reported recommendation frequencies of wearables, cardiac implantable electronic device telemonitorization, mobile health applications, and teleconsultation/televisit technologies were lower than the proportion of respondents who found DHT beneficial for both patients and physicians. The most frequently mentioned barriers for physicians were increased work burden and responsibilities (78.8%, 193/245), lack of financial compensation (66.9%, 164/245), and lack of relevant training (66.5%, 163/245). For patients, low technological adaptability (81.6%, 200/245), low health literacy (80.4%, 197/245), and low affordability (79.6%, 195/245) were the most frequently mentioned barriers. Additionally, the cost of technologies (69.4%, 170/245), concerns regarding data privacy and security (57.6%, 141/245), and data storage challenges (48.2%, 118/245) were the most significant technical impediments.

Conclusion: The findings suggest that although the majority of physicians believe DHT to be beneficial for both themselves and their patients, the frequency of recommendations to patients remains low. A large-scale joint effort is required to address these issues and facilitate the integration of DHT into clinical practice.

一个欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)成员国的专科医生对在心脏病学中使用数字健康技术的看法:调查结果。
目的在这项研究中,我们旨在确定在心脏病学中使用数字健康技术(DHT)的原因以及与之相关的认知挑战:我们在 2022 年 1 月 10 日至 3 月 3 日期间向土耳其心脏病学会会员心脏病专家(n = 2789)发放了一份在线调查问卷:共有 308 名受访者做出了回应(27.6% 为女性,62.0% 年龄在 30-44 岁之间)。其中,42.5%在大学医院工作,44.8%在州立医院工作。44.2%(136/308)的人使用智能设备进行个人健康监测。此外,40.3%(117/290)的人使用社交媒体向患者提供医疗信息,64.6%(193/299)的人使用社交媒体与其他医生交流。自我报告的可穿戴设备、心脏植入式电子设备远程监控、移动医疗应用和远程会诊/远程会诊技术的推荐频率低于认为 DHT 对患者和医生都有益的受访者比例。医生最常提到的障碍是工作负担和责任加重(78.8%,193/245)、缺乏经济补偿(66.9%,164/245)以及缺乏相关培训(66.5%,163/245)。对于患者来说,技术适应性低(81.6%,200/245)、健康知识普及率低(80.4%,197/245)和经济承受能力低(79.6%,195/245)是最常被提及的障碍。此外,技术成本(69.4%,170/245)、对数据隐私和安全的担忧(57.6%,141/245)以及数据存储挑战(48.2%,118/245)也是最主要的技术障碍:研究结果表明,尽管大多数医生认为 DHT 对自己和患者都有益,但向患者推荐的频率仍然很低。要解决这些问题并促进将 DHT 纳入临床实践,需要大规模的共同努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信