High C-Factor Cavities: How Do "Snowplow Technique", Adhesive Application Mode and Aging Influence the Microtensile Bond Strength to Dentin?

Robert Tee, Kirstin Vach, Nadine Schlueter, Silke Jacker-Guhr, Anne-Katrin Luehrs
{"title":"High C-Factor Cavities: How Do \"Snowplow Technique\", Adhesive Application Mode and Aging Influence the Microtensile Bond Strength to Dentin?","authors":"Robert Tee, Kirstin Vach, Nadine Schlueter, Silke Jacker-Guhr, Anne-Katrin Luehrs","doi":"10.3290/j.jad.b4835909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) to dentin in class-I cavities using different layering techniques, adhesive application modes, and aging.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>150 caries-free human molars were randomly assigned to 8 experimental and 2 control groups (n=15 teeth/ group). For each tooth, a standardized class-I cavity was prepared (4x4x4 mm) and pretreated with a universal adhesive (self-etch or etch-and-rinse mode). Incrementally layered restorations served as the control. In the experimental groups, either lining with bulk-fill flowable composite and a layering technique, bulk filling, or the snowplow technique with one or two layers of viscous composite were applied. Four microsticks were obtained from each cavity. Half were tested initially and the other half after aging (thermocycling, 15,000 cycles, 5-55°C, n=30 sticks/group). Tobit regression was used for analyzing group differences, including analysis of interactions, Pearson's chi-squared test or Fishers's exact test for fracture analyses (significance level 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regression analysis showed significant differences in µTBS between groups initially and after aging. In both etching modes, lining with a bulk-fill flowable composite and layering technique achieved the highest µTBS both initially and after aging. In contrast to the etching mode (self-etch < etch-and-rinse), aging did not influence µTBS significantly. The predominant failure types were adhesive and mixed, with a significantly lower number of pre-test failures in the etch-and-rinse groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The etch-and-rinse mode achieves higher µTBS in class-I cavities compared to the self-etch mode. The lining technique with bulk-fill flowable composite as well as the snowplow technique yielded the highest µTBS after aging, whereas bulk filling and its combination with the snowplow technique resulted in lower µTBS.</p>","PeriodicalId":94234,"journal":{"name":"The journal of adhesive dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of adhesive dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.b4835909","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) to dentin in class-I cavities using different layering techniques, adhesive application modes, and aging.

Materials and methods: 150 caries-free human molars were randomly assigned to 8 experimental and 2 control groups (n=15 teeth/ group). For each tooth, a standardized class-I cavity was prepared (4x4x4 mm) and pretreated with a universal adhesive (self-etch or etch-and-rinse mode). Incrementally layered restorations served as the control. In the experimental groups, either lining with bulk-fill flowable composite and a layering technique, bulk filling, or the snowplow technique with one or two layers of viscous composite were applied. Four microsticks were obtained from each cavity. Half were tested initially and the other half after aging (thermocycling, 15,000 cycles, 5-55°C, n=30 sticks/group). Tobit regression was used for analyzing group differences, including analysis of interactions, Pearson's chi-squared test or Fishers's exact test for fracture analyses (significance level 0.05).

Results: Regression analysis showed significant differences in µTBS between groups initially and after aging. In both etching modes, lining with a bulk-fill flowable composite and layering technique achieved the highest µTBS both initially and after aging. In contrast to the etching mode (self-etch < etch-and-rinse), aging did not influence µTBS significantly. The predominant failure types were adhesive and mixed, with a significantly lower number of pre-test failures in the etch-and-rinse groups.

Conclusion: The etch-and-rinse mode achieves higher µTBS in class-I cavities compared to the self-etch mode. The lining technique with bulk-fill flowable composite as well as the snowplow technique yielded the highest µTBS after aging, whereas bulk filling and its combination with the snowplow technique resulted in lower µTBS.

高 C 因子龋洞:扫雪技术"、粘合剂应用模式和老化如何影响牙本质的微拉伸粘结强度?
材料和方法:150 颗无龋人类臼齿被随机分配到 8 个实验组和 2 个对照组(n=15 颗/组)。每颗牙齿都制备了一个标准的 I 类龋洞(4x4x4 毫米),并用通用粘合剂(自刻或蚀刻-冲洗模式)进行了预处理。增量分层修复体作为对照组。在实验组中,使用了散装填充流动复合材料衬里和分层技术、散装填充技术或使用一层或两层粘性复合材料的刨雪技术。从每个空腔中获得四根微棒。一半进行初始测试,另一半在老化(热循环,15000 个循环,5-55°C,n=30 根/组)后进行测试。使用托比特回归分析组间差异,包括交互作用分析、皮尔逊卡方检验或菲舍尔精确检验进行断裂分析(显著性水平为 0.05):回归分析表明,最初和老化后各组之间的 µTBS 差异很大。在两种蚀刻模式中,使用膨体填充可流动复合材料和分层技术的内衬在初始和老化后都获得了最高的 µTBS 值。与蚀刻模式(自蚀刻 < 蚀刻-冲洗)相反,老化对 µTBS 的影响不大。主要的失效类型是粘合和混合,蚀刻-冲洗组的测试前失效数量明显较少:结论:与自蚀模式相比,蚀刻-冲洗模式在 I 级洞中可获得更高的µTBS。使用散装填充可流动复合材料的衬里技术以及雪犁技术在老化后获得的 µTBS 最高,而散装填充及其与雪犁技术的结合则导致 µTBS 较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信