Impact Deceleration Differences on Natural Grass Versus Synthetic Turf High School Football Fields.

Q4 Medicine
Nathaniel C Villanueva, Ian K H Chun, Alyssa S Fujiwara, Emily R Leibovitch, Brennan E Yamamoto, Loren G Yamamoto
{"title":"Impact Deceleration Differences on Natural Grass Versus Synthetic Turf High School Football Fields.","authors":"Nathaniel C Villanueva, Ian K H Chun, Alyssa S Fujiwara, Emily R Leibovitch, Brennan E Yamamoto, Loren G Yamamoto","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>American football has the highest rate of concussions in United States high school sports. Within American football, impact against the playing surface is the second-most common mechanism of injury. The objective of this study was to determine if there is a difference in impact deceleration between natural grass and synthetic turf high school football fields. A Century Body Opponent Bag (BOB) manikin was equipped with a Riddell football helmet and 3 accelerometers were placed on the forehead, apex of the head, and right ear. The manikin was dropped from a stationary position onto its front, back, and left side onto natural grass (n = 10) and synthetic turf (n = 9) outdoor football fields owned and maintained by public and private institutions on O'ahu, Hawai'i. Data was collected on 1,710 total drops. All accelerometers in forward and backward falls, and 1 accelerometer in side falls showed significantly greater impact deceleration on synthetic turf compared to the natural grass surfaces (<i>P</i> < .05). The results of this study provide evidence-based rationale to inform youth sports policies, particularly those aimed at injury prevention through safer playing environments and equipment.</p>","PeriodicalId":36659,"journal":{"name":"Hawai''i journal of health & social welfare","volume":"83 1","pages":"4-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10782390/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hawai''i journal of health & social welfare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

American football has the highest rate of concussions in United States high school sports. Within American football, impact against the playing surface is the second-most common mechanism of injury. The objective of this study was to determine if there is a difference in impact deceleration between natural grass and synthetic turf high school football fields. A Century Body Opponent Bag (BOB) manikin was equipped with a Riddell football helmet and 3 accelerometers were placed on the forehead, apex of the head, and right ear. The manikin was dropped from a stationary position onto its front, back, and left side onto natural grass (n = 10) and synthetic turf (n = 9) outdoor football fields owned and maintained by public and private institutions on O'ahu, Hawai'i. Data was collected on 1,710 total drops. All accelerometers in forward and backward falls, and 1 accelerometer in side falls showed significantly greater impact deceleration on synthetic turf compared to the natural grass surfaces (P < .05). The results of this study provide evidence-based rationale to inform youth sports policies, particularly those aimed at injury prevention through safer playing environments and equipment.

天然草皮与人造草皮高中足球场上的冲击减速度差异。
在美国高中体育运动中,美式橄榄球的脑震荡发生率最高。在美式橄榄球运动中,撞击比赛场地是第二常见的受伤机制。本研究的目的是确定天然草坪和人造草坪高中足球场的撞击减速是否存在差异。世纪人体对抗袋 (BOB) 人体模型配备了雷德尔橄榄球头盔,并在前额、头顶和右耳放置了 3 个加速度计。将人体模型从静止状态分别从正面、背面和左侧投放到夏威夷瓦胡岛由公共和私人机构拥有和维护的天然草坪(10 个)和人造草坪(9 个)室外足球场上。共收集了 1,710 次下落的数据。所有向前和向后跌落的加速度计以及 1 个侧面跌落的加速度计均显示,与天然草坪相比,合成草坪的冲击减速度明显更大(P < .05)。这项研究的结果为青少年体育政策提供了循证依据,特别是那些旨在通过更安全的运动环境和设备来预防伤害的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信