Long-term efficacy and safety of nonablative monopolar radiofrequency in the treatment of moderate to severe acne vulgaris

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Woraphong Manuskiatti MD, Supisara Wongdama MD, Noldtawat Viriyaskultorn MD, Jayne Bernadeth Li MD, Kanokvalai Kulthanan MD, Thanya Techapichetvanich MD
{"title":"Long-term efficacy and safety of nonablative monopolar radiofrequency in the treatment of moderate to severe acne vulgaris","authors":"Woraphong Manuskiatti MD,&nbsp;Supisara Wongdama MD,&nbsp;Noldtawat Viriyaskultorn MD,&nbsp;Jayne Bernadeth Li MD,&nbsp;Kanokvalai Kulthanan MD,&nbsp;Thanya Techapichetvanich MD","doi":"10.1002/lsm.23757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Acne vulgaris (AV) is a prevalent skin condition known for its potential to cause scarring and psychological distress, often leading to diminished self-esteem. While topical and oral treatments are commonly prescribed, some patients experience treatment failure, adverse effects, or contraindications to conventional therapies. In response to these challenges, laser and energy-based device therapies have emerged as promising alternatives for individuals who fall into these categories, showing considerable potential in the treatment of AV.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of a nonablative monopolar radiofrequency (NMRF) in treatment of moderate to severe AV.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-four patients with moderate to severe AV underwent a series of two NMRF treatment sessions, spaced 4 weeks apart. To evaluate treatment outcomes, live in-person lesion counts and measurements of pore size and volume, and sebum production were quantified using Antera® 3D imaging system, and Sebumeter®, respectively. Patients' self-assessment data regarding degree of improvement and facial oiliness were gathered. Dermatology life quality index (DLQI) questionnaire was utilized to assess the impact of AV on their quality of life. All objective and subjective evaluations were conducted at the baseline, 1 month after the first treatment, and during follow-up visits 1, 3, and 6 months after the last treatment sessions. Adverse effects were also recorded during each visit.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty out of the 24 subjects completed the study protocol. The mean inflammatory lesion counts significantly reduced by 42.86% and 45.71% from the baseline at 3 (<i>p</i> = 0.027) and 6 months (<i>p</i> = 0.032) after the second treatment. Sebum excretion likewise significantly decreased from baseline by 11.62% (<i>p</i> = 0.012), 13.37% (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), and 21.51% (<i>p</i> = 0.004), 1 month after the first treatment, 1 and 6 months after the second treatment, respectively. The pore volume continued to decrease by 35% (<i>p</i> = 0.003) and 41.5% (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) at 1 and 6 months following the final treatment, respectively. The DLQI significantly decreased from 10.00 (interquartile range [IQR]: 6.50−15.00) to 2.00 (IQR: 1.00−4.75), corresponding to 80% improvement of the index, 1 month after the last treatment and was sustained up to the last follow-up visit. Patients' self-assessments on degree of improvement and facial oiliness also significantly improved following NMRF treatments. The treatments were well-tolerated without significant adverse effects.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>NMRF appears to be an effective and safe treatment for inflammatory AV, with therapeutic outcomes persisting up to 6 months after two treatment sessions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17961,"journal":{"name":"Lasers in Surgery and Medicine","volume":"56 2","pages":"133-141"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lsm.23757","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lasers in Surgery and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lsm.23757","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Acne vulgaris (AV) is a prevalent skin condition known for its potential to cause scarring and psychological distress, often leading to diminished self-esteem. While topical and oral treatments are commonly prescribed, some patients experience treatment failure, adverse effects, or contraindications to conventional therapies. In response to these challenges, laser and energy-based device therapies have emerged as promising alternatives for individuals who fall into these categories, showing considerable potential in the treatment of AV.

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of a nonablative monopolar radiofrequency (NMRF) in treatment of moderate to severe AV.

Methods

Twenty-four patients with moderate to severe AV underwent a series of two NMRF treatment sessions, spaced 4 weeks apart. To evaluate treatment outcomes, live in-person lesion counts and measurements of pore size and volume, and sebum production were quantified using Antera® 3D imaging system, and Sebumeter®, respectively. Patients' self-assessment data regarding degree of improvement and facial oiliness were gathered. Dermatology life quality index (DLQI) questionnaire was utilized to assess the impact of AV on their quality of life. All objective and subjective evaluations were conducted at the baseline, 1 month after the first treatment, and during follow-up visits 1, 3, and 6 months after the last treatment sessions. Adverse effects were also recorded during each visit.

Results

Twenty out of the 24 subjects completed the study protocol. The mean inflammatory lesion counts significantly reduced by 42.86% and 45.71% from the baseline at 3 (p = 0.027) and 6 months (p = 0.032) after the second treatment. Sebum excretion likewise significantly decreased from baseline by 11.62% (p = 0.012), 13.37% (p < 0.001), and 21.51% (p = 0.004), 1 month after the first treatment, 1 and 6 months after the second treatment, respectively. The pore volume continued to decrease by 35% (p = 0.003) and 41.5% (p < 0.001) at 1 and 6 months following the final treatment, respectively. The DLQI significantly decreased from 10.00 (interquartile range [IQR]: 6.50−15.00) to 2.00 (IQR: 1.00−4.75), corresponding to 80% improvement of the index, 1 month after the last treatment and was sustained up to the last follow-up visit. Patients' self-assessments on degree of improvement and facial oiliness also significantly improved following NMRF treatments. The treatments were well-tolerated without significant adverse effects.

Conclusion

NMRF appears to be an effective and safe treatment for inflammatory AV, with therapeutic outcomes persisting up to 6 months after two treatment sessions.

Abstract Image

非烧蚀单极射频治疗中重度寻常痤疮的长期疗效和安全性。
背景:寻常性痤疮(AV)是一种常见的皮肤病,可能会造成疤痕和心理困扰,往往导致自尊心下降。虽然外用药和口服药是常用的治疗方法,但有些患者会出现治疗失败、不良反应或传统疗法禁忌症。为了应对这些挑战,激光和基于能量的设备疗法已成为有前途的替代疗法,显示出治疗反车辆的巨大潜力:本研究旨在评估非烧蚀性单极射频(NMRF)治疗中度至重度房室传导阻滞的长期疗效和安全性:24名中重度房室传导患者接受了两次非剥脱单极射频(NMRF)治疗,每次治疗间隔4周。为了评估治疗效果,使用 Antera® 3D 成像系统和 Sebumeter® 分别对患者的皮损计数、毛孔大小和体积以及皮脂分泌进行了现场量化测量。还收集了患者对改善程度和面部出油情况的自我评估数据。皮肤科生活质量指数(DLQI)问卷用于评估 AV 对患者生活质量的影响。所有客观和主观评估均在基线、首次治疗后 1 个月以及最后一次治疗后 1、3 和 6 个月的随访中进行。每次就诊时还记录了不良反应:结果:24 名受试者中有 20 人完成了研究方案。在第二次治疗后的 3 个月(p = 0.027)和 6 个月(p = 0.032),平均炎症病变计数比基线值分别显著减少了 42.86% 和 45.71%。皮脂排泄量也同样比基线明显减少了 11.62% (p = 0.012)、13.37% (p 结论:NMRF 是一种有效的皮脂治疗方法:NMRF 似乎是治疗炎症性视网膜病变的一种有效而安全的方法,其疗效在两次治疗后可持续 6 个月。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
119
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Lasers in Surgery and Medicine publishes the highest quality research and clinical manuscripts in areas relating to the use of lasers in medicine and biology. The journal publishes basic and clinical studies on the therapeutic and diagnostic use of lasers in all the surgical and medical specialties. Contributions regarding clinical trials, new therapeutic techniques or instrumentation, laser biophysics and bioengineering, photobiology and photochemistry, outcomes research, cost-effectiveness, and other aspects of biomedicine are welcome. Using a process of rigorous yet rapid review of submitted manuscripts, findings of high scientific and medical interest are published with a minimum delay.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信