Obstructive Sleep Apnea: a risk for uncontrolled and more severe asthma in adults that we should keep an eye on.

IF 2.6 Q2 ALLERGY
G Martins Dos Santos, P Simão Coelho, J Gaspar Marques, S Serranho, S Santos, A Brito, P Carreiro Martins, P Leiria Pinto
{"title":"Obstructive Sleep Apnea: a risk for uncontrolled and more severe asthma in adults that we should keep an eye on.","authors":"G Martins Dos Santos, P Simão Coelho, J Gaspar Marques, S Serranho, S Santos, A Brito, P Carreiro Martins, P Leiria Pinto","doi":"10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Summary: </strong><b>Background.</b> Asthma control can be influenced by several factors, including obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The literature reports variable prevalence and magnitude of OSA impact on asthma outcomes. The aim of our study is to analyze the frequency of high-risk for OSA in asthma patients and its impact on disease severity and control. <b>Methods.</b> We conducted a cross-sectional study at an Allergy Department with adult asthma patients recruited while undergoing routine lung function tests. Data on sex, age, body mass index, allergen sensitization, smoking habits, risk of OSA (using the Berlin questionnaire), rhinitis control (through CARAT), asthma severity (based on GINA 2023), asthma control (using the ACT), adherence to asthma treatment (through Treatment Adherence Measure) and pulmonary function test results were collected. <b>Results.</b> We included 216 patients, predominantly women (70.4%), with a median (P25-P75) age of 29.0 (21.0-45.0) years, of whom 28.2% were on GINA treatment levels 4-5. In 75.5% of cases asthma was controlled. High-risk for OSA was identified in 21.8% of patients. Asthma patients with high-risk for OSA were more likely to have uncontrolled [(47.8%; n = 22) <i>vs</i> (15.8%; n = 26); p less than 0.001] and more severe disease [(44.7%; n = 21) <i>vs</i> (23.7%; n = 40), p = 0.006]. In multivariable analysis, high-risk for OSA (OR 2.81 [95%CI 1.1.28-6.17], p = 0.010), sex (women) (OR 5.21 [95% CI 1.70-15.96], p = 0.004), uncontrolled rhinitis (OR 3.65 [95%CI 1.38-9.64], p = 0.009) and GINA asthma treatment steps 4-5 (OR 2.46 [95%CI 1.15-5.26], p = 0.020) were associated with uncontrolled asthma. <b>Conclusions.</b> It is crucial to actively investigate OSA, especially in patients with uncontrolled and more severe forms of asthma.</p>","PeriodicalId":11890,"journal":{"name":"European annals of allergy and clinical immunology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European annals of allergy and clinical immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary: Background. Asthma control can be influenced by several factors, including obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The literature reports variable prevalence and magnitude of OSA impact on asthma outcomes. The aim of our study is to analyze the frequency of high-risk for OSA in asthma patients and its impact on disease severity and control. Methods. We conducted a cross-sectional study at an Allergy Department with adult asthma patients recruited while undergoing routine lung function tests. Data on sex, age, body mass index, allergen sensitization, smoking habits, risk of OSA (using the Berlin questionnaire), rhinitis control (through CARAT), asthma severity (based on GINA 2023), asthma control (using the ACT), adherence to asthma treatment (through Treatment Adherence Measure) and pulmonary function test results were collected. Results. We included 216 patients, predominantly women (70.4%), with a median (P25-P75) age of 29.0 (21.0-45.0) years, of whom 28.2% were on GINA treatment levels 4-5. In 75.5% of cases asthma was controlled. High-risk for OSA was identified in 21.8% of patients. Asthma patients with high-risk for OSA were more likely to have uncontrolled [(47.8%; n = 22) vs (15.8%; n = 26); p less than 0.001] and more severe disease [(44.7%; n = 21) vs (23.7%; n = 40), p = 0.006]. In multivariable analysis, high-risk for OSA (OR 2.81 [95%CI 1.1.28-6.17], p = 0.010), sex (women) (OR 5.21 [95% CI 1.70-15.96], p = 0.004), uncontrolled rhinitis (OR 3.65 [95%CI 1.38-9.64], p = 0.009) and GINA asthma treatment steps 4-5 (OR 2.46 [95%CI 1.15-5.26], p = 0.020) were associated with uncontrolled asthma. Conclusions. It is crucial to actively investigate OSA, especially in patients with uncontrolled and more severe forms of asthma.

阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停:这是导致成人哮喘不受控制和更加严重的一个风险,我们应该密切关注。
摘要:背景。哮喘控制会受到多种因素的影响,其中包括阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)。文献报道 OSA 的患病率和对哮喘预后的影响程度各不相同。我们的研究旨在分析哮喘患者中 OSA 高危人群的频率及其对疾病严重程度和控制的影响。研究方法我们在过敏性疾病科进行了一项横断面研究,招募了正在接受常规肺功能检查的成年哮喘患者。我们收集了有关性别、年龄、体重指数、过敏原致敏程度、吸烟习惯、OSA 风险(使用柏林问卷)、鼻炎控制(通过 CARAT)、哮喘严重程度(基于 GINA 2023)、哮喘控制(使用 ACT)、哮喘治疗依从性(通过治疗依从性测量)和肺功能测试结果的数据。结果。我们共纳入了 216 名患者,主要为女性(70.4%),中位数(P25-P75)年龄为 29.0(21.0-45.0)岁,其中 28.2% 接受了 GINA 4-5 级治疗。75.5%的患者哮喘得到控制。21.8%的患者被确定为 OSA 高危人群。OSA高危哮喘患者更有可能病情未得到控制[(47.8%;n = 22) vs (15.8%;n = 26);p 小于 0.001],病情也更严重[(44.7%;n = 21) vs (23.7%;n = 40),p = 0.006]。在多变量分析中,OSA(OR 2.81 [95%CI 1.1.28-6.17],P = 0.010)、性别(女性)(OR 5.21 [95%CI 1.70-15.96],P = 0.004)、未控制的鼻炎(OR 3.65 [95%CI 1.38-9.64],p = 0.009)和 GINA 哮喘治疗步骤 4-5 (OR 2.46 [95%CI 1.15-5.26],p = 0.020)与未控制的哮喘有关。结论:积极调查 OSA 至关重要。积极调查 OSA 至关重要,尤其是在哮喘未得到控制且病情较为严重的患者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
102
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信