Effect of Intraligamentary Tramadol Hydrochloride on Anesthetic Success During Endodontic Management of Mandibular Molars: A Randomized Clinical Controlled Trial.

IF 1.6 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
European Endodontic Journal Pub Date : 2024-03-08 Epub Date: 2024-01-12 DOI:10.14744/eej.2023.48343
Vivek Aggarwal, Mamta Singla, Alpa Gupta, Umesh Kumar, Masoud Saatchi
{"title":"Effect of Intraligamentary Tramadol Hydrochloride on Anesthetic Success During Endodontic Management of Mandibular Molars: A Randomized Clinical Controlled Trial.","authors":"Vivek Aggarwal, Mamta Singla, Alpa Gupta, Umesh Kumar, Masoud Saatchi","doi":"10.14744/eej.2023.48343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Tramadol hydrochloride has shown local anesthetic properties similar to lidocaine, apart from a central analgesic effect. The present study evaluated the effect of the administration of tramadol alone or in addition to 2% lidocaine, as supplementary intraligamentary injections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred and five patients, with a failed primary inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB), were randomly allocated to one of the three supplementary intraligamentary groups: 2% lidocaine with 1: 80,000 epinephrine; tramadol hydrochloride (50 mg/mL); and 2% lidocaine with 1: 80,000 epinephrine plus tramadol hydrochloride. Patients received 1.2 mL doses (0.6 mL of each root). Patients reporting pain ≤54 on Heft Parker visual analogue scale (Heft-Parker VAS), were categorized as successful anesthesia. A finger pulse oximeter was used to measure the heart rates. The anesthetic success rates, gender, and type of tooth were compared using the Pearson chi-square test. The heart rates and age were statistically evaluated using the one-way analysis of variance test. The level of significance was set at 0.05 (p=0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial IANB was successful in 31% of cases. There were significant differences in the anesthetic success rates of different supplementary intraligamentary injections (χ2= 33.6, p<0.001, df=2). The 2% lidocaine-plus-tramadol resulted in significantly higher success rates than the two groups. There were no significant changes in the baseline heart rates of all groups (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The addition of tramadol to 2% lidocaine with 1: 80,000 epinephrine, given as supplementary intraligamentary injection, can help in achieving successful anesthesia during the endodontic management of mandibular molars with irreversible pulpitis resistant to IANB injections.</p>","PeriodicalId":11860,"journal":{"name":"European Endodontic Journal","volume":" ","pages":"99 - 105"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10938360/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2023.48343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Tramadol hydrochloride has shown local anesthetic properties similar to lidocaine, apart from a central analgesic effect. The present study evaluated the effect of the administration of tramadol alone or in addition to 2% lidocaine, as supplementary intraligamentary injections.

Methods: One hundred and five patients, with a failed primary inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB), were randomly allocated to one of the three supplementary intraligamentary groups: 2% lidocaine with 1: 80,000 epinephrine; tramadol hydrochloride (50 mg/mL); and 2% lidocaine with 1: 80,000 epinephrine plus tramadol hydrochloride. Patients received 1.2 mL doses (0.6 mL of each root). Patients reporting pain ≤54 on Heft Parker visual analogue scale (Heft-Parker VAS), were categorized as successful anesthesia. A finger pulse oximeter was used to measure the heart rates. The anesthetic success rates, gender, and type of tooth were compared using the Pearson chi-square test. The heart rates and age were statistically evaluated using the one-way analysis of variance test. The level of significance was set at 0.05 (p=0.05).

Results: The initial IANB was successful in 31% of cases. There were significant differences in the anesthetic success rates of different supplementary intraligamentary injections (χ2= 33.6, p<0.001, df=2). The 2% lidocaine-plus-tramadol resulted in significantly higher success rates than the two groups. There were no significant changes in the baseline heart rates of all groups (p>0.05).

Conclusion: The addition of tramadol to 2% lidocaine with 1: 80,000 epinephrine, given as supplementary intraligamentary injection, can help in achieving successful anesthesia during the endodontic management of mandibular molars with irreversible pulpitis resistant to IANB injections.

下颌磨牙牙髓治疗过程中韧带内盐酸曲马多对麻醉成功率的影响:随机临床对照试验。
目的:盐酸曲马多具有与利多卡因相似的局部麻醉特性:盐酸曲马多除了具有中枢镇痛作用外,还具有与利多卡因相似的局部麻醉特性。本研究评估了单独使用曲马多或在 2% 利多卡因基础上辅助韧带内注射曲马多的效果:方法:将初级下牙槽神经阻滞(IANB)失败的 105 名患者随机分配到以下三个韧带内辅助注射组中的一个:2% 利多卡因加 1:80,000 肾上腺素组;盐酸曲马多(50 毫克/毫升)组;2% 利多卡因加 1:80,000 肾上腺素加盐酸曲马多组。患者接受的剂量为 1.2 mL(每种药根 0.6 mL)。根据海夫特-帕克视觉模拟量表(Heft-Parker VAS),疼痛感≤54 的患者被归类为麻醉成功。使用手指脉搏血氧计测量心率。麻醉成功率、性别和牙齿类型采用皮尔逊卡方检验进行比较。心率和年龄采用单因素方差分析进行统计评估。显著性水平设定为 0.05(P=0.05):结果:31%的病例初次 IANB 成功。不同补充韧带内注射的麻醉成功率存在明显差异(χ2= 33.6,P0.05):结论:在2%利多卡因加1: 80,000肾上腺素的韧带内补充注射中加入曲马多,有助于在对IANB注射耐药的不可逆牙髓炎下颌磨牙进行牙髓治疗时获得成功的麻醉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Endodontic Journal
European Endodontic Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.60%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信