Efficacy of Adjuvant First-Generation TKIs versus Chemotherapy in Patients with Completely Resected EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Cancer Investigation Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-15 DOI:10.1080/07357907.2024.2303311
Bin Shen, Dongping Wu, Jianjiang Liu, Yang Yang
{"title":"Efficacy of Adjuvant First-Generation TKIs versus Chemotherapy in Patients with Completely Resected EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Bin Shen, Dongping Wu, Jianjiang Liu, Yang Yang","doi":"10.1080/07357907.2024.2303311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of adjuvant first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKIs) in patients with resected EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. Therefore, we performed a systematic review with meta-analysis to investigate the overall survival (OS) in patients with resected NSCLC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Relevant studies were identified from the PubMed and EMBASE databases, and pooled hazard risks were obtained by random-effects models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three prospective phase III and one phase II randomized controlled trials were identified, including a total of 839 patients who had undergone resection of EGFR-sensitive mutation in our analysis, 429 of whom received adjuvant first-generation TKIs therapy. For all patients with complete resection, adjuvant first-generation TKIs therapy was associated with improved disease-free survival (DFS) [hazard ratio (HR): 0.50, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.30-0. 82] but not OS (HR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.48-1.27) compared with adjuvant chemotherapy. In addition, we reconstructed the OS curves of the ADJUVANT and IMPACT studies, and the pooled 3- and 5-year OS rates of stage II-III patients in the TKI group and chemotherapy group were 80% vs. 79% and 66% vs. 64%, respectively. We also reconstructed the DFS curves based on the ADJUVANT, IMPACT, and EVIDENCE studies, and the pooled 1-, 3- and 5-year DFS rates of stage II-III patients in the TKI group and chemotherapy group were 87% vs. 70%, 49% vs. 37% and 28% vs. 29%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with completely resected EGFR-mutant NSCLC, adjuvant first-generation TKIs may delay disease progression but still fail to improve long-term survival compared with conventional chemotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9463,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"63-74"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07357907.2024.2303311","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of adjuvant first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKIs) in patients with resected EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. Therefore, we performed a systematic review with meta-analysis to investigate the overall survival (OS) in patients with resected NSCLC.

Methods: Relevant studies were identified from the PubMed and EMBASE databases, and pooled hazard risks were obtained by random-effects models.

Results: Three prospective phase III and one phase II randomized controlled trials were identified, including a total of 839 patients who had undergone resection of EGFR-sensitive mutation in our analysis, 429 of whom received adjuvant first-generation TKIs therapy. For all patients with complete resection, adjuvant first-generation TKIs therapy was associated with improved disease-free survival (DFS) [hazard ratio (HR): 0.50, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.30-0. 82] but not OS (HR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.48-1.27) compared with adjuvant chemotherapy. In addition, we reconstructed the OS curves of the ADJUVANT and IMPACT studies, and the pooled 3- and 5-year OS rates of stage II-III patients in the TKI group and chemotherapy group were 80% vs. 79% and 66% vs. 64%, respectively. We also reconstructed the DFS curves based on the ADJUVANT, IMPACT, and EVIDENCE studies, and the pooled 1-, 3- and 5-year DFS rates of stage II-III patients in the TKI group and chemotherapy group were 87% vs. 70%, 49% vs. 37% and 28% vs. 29%, respectively.

Conclusions: In patients with completely resected EGFR-mutant NSCLC, adjuvant first-generation TKIs may delay disease progression but still fail to improve long-term survival compared with conventional chemotherapy.

完全切除的表皮生长因子受体突变非小细胞肺癌患者第一代 TKIs 辅助治疗与化疗的疗效对比:一项 Meta 分析。
背景:切除的表皮生长因子受体突变非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者辅助使用第一代表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(EGFR-TKIs)仍存在争议。因此,我们进行了一项系统综述和荟萃分析,研究切除的非小细胞肺癌患者的总生存率(OS):方法:从PubMed和EMBASE数据库中筛选出相关研究,并通过随机效应模型得出汇总危险风险:结果:共发现3项前瞻性III期和1项II期随机对照试验,我们的分析共包括839例接受了表皮生长因子受体敏感突变切除术的患者,其中429例接受了第一代TKIs辅助治疗。对于所有完全切除的患者,与辅助化疗相比,第一代TKIs辅助治疗与无病生存期(DFS)的改善相关[危险比(HR):0.50,95%置信区间(CI):0.30-0.82],但与OS(HR:0.78,95%置信区间(CI):0.48-1.27)无关。此外,我们还重建了ADJUVANT和IMPACT研究的OS曲线,TKI组和化疗组II-III期患者的3年和5年总OS率分别为80% vs. 79%和66% vs. 64%。我们还根据ADJUVANT、IMPACT和EVIDENCE研究重建了DFS曲线,TKI组和化疗组II-III期患者的汇总1年、3年和5年DFS率分别为87% vs. 70%、49% vs. 37%和28% vs. 29%:结论:对于完全切除的表皮生长因子受体突变型NSCLC患者,第一代TKIs辅助治疗可延缓疾病进展,但与传统化疗相比,仍无法改善长期生存率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Investigation
Cancer Investigation 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
71
审稿时长
8.5 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Investigation is one of the most highly regarded and recognized journals in the field of basic and clinical oncology. It is designed to give physicians a comprehensive resource on the current state of progress in the cancer field as well as a broad background of reliable information necessary for effective decision making. In addition to presenting original papers of fundamental significance, it also publishes reviews, essays, specialized presentations of controversies, considerations of new technologies and their applications to specific laboratory problems, discussions of public issues, miniseries on major topics, new and experimental drugs and therapies, and an innovative letters to the editor section. One of the unique features of the journal is its departmentalized editorial sections reporting on more than 30 subject categories covering the broad spectrum of specialized areas that together comprise the field of oncology. Edited by leading physicians and research scientists, these sections make Cancer Investigation the prime resource for clinicians seeking to make sense of the sometimes-overwhelming amount of information available throughout the field. In addition to its peer-reviewed clinical research, the journal also features translational studies that bridge the gap between the laboratory and the clinic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信